Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: T02CM02218
Parcel: 111071290

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: SITE

Permit Number - T02CM02218
Review Name: SITE
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
09/09/2002 PETER MCLAUGHLIN ZONING REVIEW Denied SITE PLAN TRANSMITTAL

TO: Enrique Durazo
7475 E. Broadway Blvd.
Tucson, AZ 85710

FROM: Peter McLaughlin Senior Planner

FOR: Patricia Gehlen
Principal Planner

PROJECT:
T02CM02218
RWG Apartments
3316 E. Bermuda Street

TRANSMITTAL: September 9, 2002

COMMENTS: Please attach a response letter with the next submittal, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed.

1. Please revise the property legal description to be correct. The correct legal description is Fruitvale Addition, Lot 7 Exc W 85.01' of the N 100', Block 6, Book 4, Page 58. The Assessor record indicates the site is made up of a portion of a lot. Please provide a copy of the approved lot split documentation, or a 20-year history of the property to the zoning review section.
DS 2-02.2.1.A.2


2. The existing SVT's along Bermuda Street at the ingress-egress point must be added to the plan.
DS 2-02.2.1.A.10

3. The dimensioned existing right-of-way width for Bermuda Avenue must be labeled on the site plan. Also, show the dimensions from center line to existing curb an sidewalk.
DS 2-02.2.1.A.19 & .21

4. Dimension the width of sidewalks per DS 2-08.
DS 2-02.2.1.A.12

5. Dimension the width of the proposed ingress-egress access drive and the width of the proposed PAAL.
DS 2-02.2.1.A.11

6. Per LUC 2.3.5.2.A.2, the proposed residential use is subject to LUC 3.5.7.1.F. Please add a note which details these restrictions.
LUC 2.3.5

7. The four vehicle parking spaces located adjacent to the sidewalk along the north property line are not long enough. The standard length of a parking space is eighteen feet. Dimension the parking spaces (length and width) on the drawing or provide a parking typical. Also, dimension the wheelstops from the front of parking spaces. Wheelstops must be located two-and-one-half (2½) feet from the front of the parking spaces.
DS 2-02.2.1.A.8
LUC 3.3.7.2.A
DS 3-05.2.3.C.2

8. Revise perimeter yard setbacks on the title sheet under Code Summary to indicate that the required perimeter yard building setback is the greater of 10 feet or the height of the structure wall measured from the property line. Revise the height to indicate that 25 feet is the maximum allowed height, and that 12 feet is the proposed height of exterior walls. Also provide the maximum proposed height of the building.
LUC 3.2.6.4

9. Provide a density calculation on the plan which states the maximum allowed number of units per acre and the proposed number of units per acre. Base the density calculation on the correct square footage (see comment 10 below).

10. The Assessor's Records and the lot dimensions given indicate that the correct square footage of the site is 27,459. Please revise lot size and coverage calculation. If the site area is 27,459 square feet, it will not support 10 units. Please revise plan.

11. Dimension the distance of the building from the south property line.
DS 2-02.2.1.A.7

12. Will the proposed fence be along the property line as stated in keynote 2, or will it be inside the property line as shown on the drawing? Please clarify and revise. A minimum of two feet is required between a PAAL and a fence or other obstruction.
DS 2-02.2.2.B.3

13. Dimension the back-up spur at the west end of the parking lot. The back-up spur must be a minimum of three feet in depth. In addition, three (3) feet is required between the end of the backup spur and the west property line/fence to allow for vehicle overhang. Please revise.
3-05.2.2.D

14. Because the adjacent zoning inset map on sheet C1.1 is oriented differently (with north to bottom of page), provide a north arrow or orient it in the same way as the other maps.
DS 2-02.2.2.A.3

15. Revise the parking calc to provide a breakdown of the vehicle parking spaces both required and provided. DS 2-02.2.2.A.4
LUC 3.3.7.2.C.1

16. If easements exist on the site, please show their location, type, width and provide recordation information.
DS 2-02.2.1.A.20

17. If free-standing outdoor lighting is proposed for this site, please detail on the site plan.
DS 2-02.2.1.A.25

18. The location, type, size and height of any proposed free-standing signage must be shown.
DS 2-02.2.1.A.13

19. State the existing use of the property. From aerial photos it is apparent that several buildings exist on the site. If they have not already been removed, show their location with a dashed line on the site plan and label them "to be removed".
DS 2-02.2.1.A.31

20. Correct the title on the cover sheet to be consistent with the title on other sheets. It should read "RWG Apartments" as this does not appear to be a townhouse development.

21. Bicycle parking must be shown fully dimensioned per DS 2-09.
DS 2-02.2.1.9

22. The Assessor's records show the address of the property to be 3316 E. Benson Highway. Please verify address and revise site plan if necessary.
DS 2-02.2.1.A.3

23. Provide a handicap parking detail dimensioning the width/length of handicap spaces, the width of the handicap access aisle, and the dimensions and slopes of the handicap ramps. There must also be a handicap ramp located at the front of the handicap parking access aisle. Label the location of handicap-only parking signs. ANS/IBC


24. No landscape plan has been included with this submittal. The site plan must be accompanied by a landscape plan with all information specified in DS 2-07 to demonstrate compliance with screening and landscaping requirements.
DS 2-02.2.1.C

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Peter McLaughlin, (520) 791-5608.
09/09/2002 PETER MCLAUGHLIN HANDICAP-SITE REVIEW Denied SITE PLAN TRANSMITTAL

TO: Enrique Durazo
7475 E. Broadway Blvd. #201
Tucson, AZ 85710

FROM: Peter McLaughlin
Senior Planner

FOR: Patricia Gehlen
Principal Planner

PROJECT:
T02CM02218
RWG Apartments
3316 E. Bermuda Street

TRANSMITTAL: September 9, 2002

COMMENTS: Please attach a response letter with the next submittal, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed.

1. Please revise the property legal description to be correct. The correct legal description is Fruitvale Addition, Lot 7 Exc W 85.01' of the N 100', Block 6, Book 4, Page 58. The Assessor record indicates the site is made up of a portion of a lot. Please provide a copy of the approved lot split documentation, or a 20-year history of the property to the zoning review section.
DS 2-02.2.1.A.2

2. The existing SVT's along Bermuda Street at the ingress-egress point must be added to the plan.
DS 2-02.2.1.A.10

3. The dimensioned existing right-of-way width for Bermuda Avenue must be labeled on the site plan. Also, show the dimensions from center line to existing curb an sidewalk.
DS 2-02.2.1.A.19 & .21

4. Dimension the width of sidewalks per DS 2-08.
DS 2-02.2.1.A.12

5. Dimension the width of the proposed ingress-egress access drive and the width of the proposed PAAL.
DS 2-02.2.1.A.11

6. Per LUC 2.3.5.2.A.2, the proposed residential use is subject to LUC 3.5.7.1.F. Please add a note which details these restrictions.
LUC 2.3.5

7. The four vehicle parking spaces located adjacent to the sidewalk along the north property line are not long enough. The standard length of a parking space is eighteen feet. Dimension the parking spaces (length and width) on the drawing or provide a parking typical. Also, dimension the wheelstops from the front of parking spaces. Wheelstops must be located two-and-one-half (2½) feet from the front of the parking spaces.
DS 2-02.2.1.A.8
LUC 3.3.7.2.A
DS 3-05.2.3.C.2

8. Revise perimeter yard setbacks on the title sheet under Code Summary to indicate that the required perimeter yard building setback is the greater of 10 feet or the height of the structure wall measured from the property line. Revise the height to indicate that 25 feet is the maximum allowed height, and that 12 feet is the proposed height of exterior walls. Also provide the maximum proposed height of the building.
LUC 3.2.6.4

9. Provide a density calculation on the plan which states the maximum allowed number of units per acre and the proposed number of units per acre. Base the density calculation on the correct square footage (see comment 10 below).

10. The Assessor's Records and the lot dimensions given indicate that the correct square footage of the site is 27,459. Please revise lot size and coverage calculation. If the site area is 27,459 square feet, it will not support 10 units. Please revise plan.

11. Dimension the distance of the building from the south property line.
DS 2-02.2.1.A.7

12. Will the proposed fence be along the property line as stated in keynote 2, or will it be inside the property line as shown on the drawing? Please clarify and revise. A minimum of two feet is required between a PAAL and a fence or other obstruction.
DS 2-02.2.2.B.3

13. Dimension the back-up spur at the west end of the parking lot. The back-up spur must be a minimum of three feet in depth. In addition, three (3) feet is required between the end of the backup spur and the west property line/fence to allow for vehicle overhang. Please revise.
3-05.2.2.D

14. Because the adjacent zoning inset map on sheet C1.1 is oriented differently (with north to bottom of page), provide a north arrow or orient it in the same way as the other maps.
DS 2-02.2.2.A.3

15. Revise the parking calc to provide a breakdown of the vehicle parking spaces both required and provided. DS 2-02.2.2.A.4
LUC 3.3.7.2.C.1

16. If easements exist on the site, please show their location, type, width and provide recordation information.
DS 2-02.2.1.A.20

17. If free-standing outdoor lighting is proposed for this site, please detail on the site plan.
DS 2-02.2.1.A.25

18. The location, type, size and height of any proposed free-standing signage must be shown.
DS 2-02.2.1.A.13

19. State the existing use of the property. From aerial photos it is apparent that several buildings exist on the site. If they have not already been removed, show their location with a dashed line on the site plan and label them "to be removed".
DS 2-02.2.1.A.31

20. Correct the title on the cover sheet to be consistent with the title on other sheets. It should read "RWG Apartments" as this does not appear to be a townhouse development.

21. Bicycle parking must be shown fully dimensioned per DS 2-09.
DS 2-02.2.1.9

22. The Assessor's records show the address of the property to be 3316 E. Benson Highway. Please verify address and revise site plan if necessary.
DS 2-02.2.1.A.3

23. Provide a handicap parking detail dimensioning the width/length of handicap spaces, the width of the handicap access aisle, and the dimensions and slopes of the handicap ramps. There must also be a handicap ramp located at the front of the handicap parking access aisle. Show the location of handicap-only parking signs.
ANS/IBC

24. No landscape plan has been included with this submittal. The site plan must be accompanied by a landscape plan with all information specified in DS 2-07 to demonstrate compliance with screening and landscaping requirements.
DS 2-02.2.1.C

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Peter McLaughlin, (520) 791-5608.
09/10/2002 JIM EGAN FIRE REVIEW Denied AN APPROVED TURNAROUND IS REQUIRED FOR DEAD-END FIRE APPARATUS ACCESS ROADWAYS.
09/17/2002 JOE LINVILLE NPPO REVIEW Denied Native plant preservation plan required. Plans will not be accepted for review without the required plan. LUC 3.8, DS 2-15.0
09/17/2002 JOE LINVILLE LANDSCAPE REVIEW Denied Landscape plan required. Submit plan per DS 2-07.0 in compliance with the requirements of LUC 3.7 and DS 2-06.0.
Plans will not be accepted for additional review without OK to submit from the Landscape Section.
10/01/2002 BLANCA ESPINO ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied Site Plan
1. Please correct and revise the project address to read 3316 E. Bermuda Street on the cover sheet. Add the project address on the site plan. D.S. 2-02.2.1.3

2. Indicate a location map in the upper right hand corner at a scale of 3"=1 mile. D.S. 2-02.2.1.4

3. Indicate all existing and proposed buildings and structures, including roof slope and downspouts. D.S. 2-02.2.1.6

4. Indicate existing and future sight visibility triangles.
D.S. 2-02.2.1.10

5. Limits of the 100-year floodplain and water surface elevation. D.S. 2-02.2.1.15

6. Drainage patterns, proposed finish floor elevation(s) and finish grades. D.S. 2-02.2.1.16

7. Indicate estimated cut and fill quantities if applicable or not. D.S. 2-02.2.1.17

8. Indicate if streets are public or private. D.S. 2-02.2.1.18

9. Dimensioned right-of-way, including any applicable Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Plan right-of-way.D.S.2-02.2.1.19

10. All easements of record must be graphically shown on the plan together with recording docket and page reference, indicate if applicable. D.S. 2-02.2.1.20

11. Please dimension from street monument lines to existing and proposed curbs, sidewalks, driveways and utility lines. D.S. 2-02.2.1.21

12. Indicate existing topographic contours at intervals not exceeding two (2) feet and/or spot elevations as pertinent and Bench Mark based on City of Tucson Datum, including City Field Book and page number. D.S. 2-02.2.1.23

13. The refuse container requires gates for screening and post next to the interior walls. Indicate size and access thereto fully dimensioned. Demonstrate solid waste vehicle maneuverability. D.S. 2-02.2.1.32, D.S. 6-01.2.2, D.S. 6-01.4.1, D.S. 6-01.4.2 and D.S. 6-01.10.0 Figures 1 & 2.


Hydrology Report
1. This site is in a COT floodplain. Please submit a Hydrology Report indicating offsite and onsite drainage, floodplain analysis and results. A Floodplain Use Permit is required. Floodplain Use Permit applications can be picked up at the Engineering counter on the first floor of COT/DSD.
S.M.D.D.F.M.2.3.1.3
10/02/2002 BLANCA ESPINO FLOODPLAIN REVIEW Denied SEE ENGINEERING FOLDER.
10/02/2002 BLANCA ESPINO SANITATION REVIEW Denied SEE ENGINEERING FOLDER.

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
10/03/2002 ELAINE ROSE OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed