City of Tucson

Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Number: T02CM02218

Parcel: 111071290

Address:

3316 E BERMUDA ST #1101

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: COMMERCIAL NEW

Permit Number - T02CM02218

Review Name: COMMERCIAL NEW

Review Status: Completed

Review Date	Reviewer's Name	Type of Review	Description	Status	Comments
08/26/2002	HOLLY PEARCE	WATER	REVIEW	Approved
08/27/2002	HOLLY PEARCE	MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL	REVIEW	Denied	Mechanical 1. Seal MEC calculations. 2. Show on the plan how the mechanical design complies with Chapter 4 IMC 2000. 3. Provide access in the two bedroom units Per Sec306.2 IMC2000 and Sec511.0UPC1994 Az. Code. 4. Concrete pads shall comply with Sec304.8 IMC 2000. 5. Show the condensate lines, size on the plans. 6. Provide the dryer duct size on the plan.
08/27/2002	HOLLY PEARCE	PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL	REVIEW	Denied	Plumbing 1. Provide the up and down stream MH Rim elev. , Iverts and slope of sewer line on C1.1. 2. T & P discharge shall comply with Sec608.5 UPC 1994 Az. Code not IMC 2001. 3. Provide the manufactures name and listings for all plumbing fixtures on the plan. 4. Show VT's on P1.3.
08/30/2002	RANDY SCHULER	ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL	REVIEW	Denied	GENERAL COMMENT 1) Due to the nature and complexity of this project and in accordance with the proficiency requirements found in the State Board of Technical Registration Rules, an Electrical Engineer registered in Arizona will be required to prepare and seal this design. See SBTR Article 3. "Regulatory Provisions", R4-30-301. "Rules of Professional Conduct", Section B. 2 a. and b. and R4-30-301 Section B. 3.. 2) All comments below are typical for both the 2 and 3 bedroom units unless otherwise noted 3) The utility requires a multi-meter pack which only necessitates 1 service lateral. Provide a complete design. Include all relevant details such as, component short circuit current rating, fault current analysis, load calculations, conduit and conductor sizes and types, and the proposed routing to each apartment sub panel. In addition, this design as submitted requires the sub panel, dryer, AC, and electric furnace to be routed from the main service location to each of the respective apartment sub panels. This methodology will require multiple conduits run underground (to avoid fire wall penetrations) to each apartment. Finally the design requires the occupant to travel to 2 locations in order to disconnect all power from the unit. 4) The load calculations indicate the furnace load is 11.2kW (14kW - HP load) or 48.7 amps. 99NEC 424-3(b) requires the load be calculated at 125% for branch circuit sizing. The 30 amp circuit provided appears to be inadequate. 5) Except for the range, dryer, dishwasher, refrigerator and disposal, all utilization equipment is required to be hardwired. In addition a disconnect is required. The disconnects must be located such that the working clearances (required by 99NEC 110-26) are clearly shown on the plan. See 99NEC 422-16,31, and 35. 6) 99NEC 220-30(a) will not allow the optional calculation to be utilized for the feeder serving the sub panels. The optional calculation requires all of the load be connected to a single feeder or service entrance conductor. 7) The sub panel in the 2 bedroom unit is located in the firewall. A firewall membrane penetration cannot exceed 16 in2 . See 2000 IBC 711.3.2. 8) ARC Fault Circuit Interrupter(s) are required for all bedroom receptacles. See 99NEC 210-12 PAGE 2 of 2 9) Provide the conductor type, quantity, and size for the range circuit. Note: #8 copper 3 conductor with ground minimum is required. 10) It appears an additional receptacle is required adjacent to the fixed slider in bedroom 2 of the 2 bedroom plan. 99NEC 210-52(a)(1)(2). 11) 99NEC 210-11(c)(1), and 210-52(b) require a 20 amp circuit for the dining room receptacles. See circuit A-13 12) In the 3 bedroom circuit 19 serves bedroom #3 receptacles not bathroom #3 receptacles.
09/09/2002	PETER MCLAUGHLIN	ZONING	REVIEW	Denied	See site plan comments.
09/10/2002	JIM EGAN	FIRE	REVIEW	Denied	1. SEE SITE COMMENTS. 2. DWELLING UNIT SEPARATION REQUIRED PER 2000 IBC SEC. 708. 3, PENTRATIONS THROUGH DWELLING UNIT SEPARATIONS PER 2000 IBC SEC. 711.
09/25/2002	RAUL PALMA	BUILDING-COMMERCIAL	REVIEW	Denied	City of Tucson, Development Services BUILDING AND STRUCTURAL COMMENTS 1) Comply to Fire Department comments. 2) Specify the GA file no. per the "Fire Resistence Design Manual" or the 2000 IBC table 719.1(2) and item no.
09/26/2002	GERRY KOZIOL	WWM	REVIEW	Approved
10/02/2002	BLANCA ESPINO	FLOODPLAIN	REVIEW	Denied	FUP REQUIRED.

Final Status

Task End Date	Reviewer's Name	Type of Review	Description
10/03/2002	ELAINE ROSE	OUT TO CUSTOMER	Completed