Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: T02CM02133
Parcel: 13102008A

Address:
5401 E 29TH ST

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: SITE

Permit Number - T02CM02133
Review Name: SITE
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
05/03/2002 DAN CASTRO ZONING REVIEW Denied COMMENTS: Please attach a response letter with the next submittal, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed.
CODE SECTION/ DEVELOPMENT STANDARD

1. City of Tucson lot combination approval is required for this site. Attached is a copy of the covenant prepared by the City Attorney's Office which must be recorded and a copy submitted to the Zoning Review Section prior to site plan approval.
D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.2

2. If applicable, provide a detail of proposed freestanding signage and outdoor lighting on the site plan.
D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.13/ D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.25

3. Per the Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Plan, total right-of-way for 29th Street is 100 feet (50 foot half-right-of-way).
D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.19

4. All requested changes must be made to the site and landscape plans.

5. Review of this plan by the Zoning Review Section may be done over the counter. Please contact Dan Castro to set an appointment.
05/06/2002 JOE LINVILLE NPPO REVIEW Approved No PNP's per 1998 PC aerial photo.
05/06/2002 JOE LINVILLE LANDSCAPE REVIEW Denied The plans indicate service yard, storage, and loading in portions of the site, these areas must be screened with a 6' wall from the adjacent residentially zoned property. LUC Table 3.7.2-I

The outdoor storage areas must be screened with a 6' screen from adjacent commercially zoned properties to the east and west. LUC Table 3.7.2-I

Revise the parking wheel stop information as necessary to provide pedestrian access and code compliant vehicle spaces.

Revise the symbol for T-1 for consistency on the landscape schedule and the planting plan.

The landscape border must be located based on the MS&R right of way line. Provide verification that the 45' half right of way indicated is consistent with MS&R Plan. LUC 2.8.3.4.
05/21/2002 DOUG WILLIAMS FLOODPLAIN REVIEW Denied Drainage Report not in package. Consultant must provide drainage report (as noted on site review record). Report approval is required prior to Site Plan approval.

A floodplain use permit is required for any development in the floodplain - NOTE: if the the proposed metal (open) awning is going to be enclosed at some point in the future, then the FFE should be set one (1) foot above the 100-year water surface elevation (base flood) under this proposed improvement.

See other comments in Engineering folder - further drainage/floodplain comments may be forthcoming with the drainage report review.
05/21/2002 DOUG WILLIAMS SANITATION REVIEW Denied The consultant should refer to Dev. Std. 6-01.0 for solid waste comments/requirements:

1. Maximum backing distance appears to be exceeded in maneuverability depiction - complete the third movement (exit) on the corrected plan.
2. Include a note for a suitable gate, doors and hatches to ensure conformance to (D.S. 6-01.4.2 B).
3. Note minimum thickness of (5") concrete pad, and 10' min. clear, inside dimensions for dumpster enclosure (D.S. 6-01.4.2 C 1).
4. Include sidewall and middle backwall bollards with enclosure detail (D.S. 6-01.4.2 C 2).
05/23/2002 DOUG WILLIAMS ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied 1. Depict the future sight visibility triangles - future ROW is 100' per MS&R Plan, with an 11' sidewalk area, thus the future triangles should begin 39' from 29th street centerline. Correct the sight visibility triangle on the east side of the east paal/driveway - the edge of the triangle should be aligned with the edge of curbing (D.S. 2-02.2.1.10 and 3-01.5.0).
2. Dimension eastern paal/driveway (D.S. 2-02.2.1.11)
3. Depict vehicular maneuverability, fully dimensioned, for the loading zones (D.S. 2-02.2.1.14
4. Remove excess wheel-stop-curbing onsite for plan clarity, if not to be kept/installed.
5. Depict the limits of the 100-year floodplain. (D.S. 2-02.2.1.15).
6. Provide estimated cut/fill quantities. (D.S. 2-02.2.1.17)
7. Provide esisting topographic contours....(D.S. 2-02.2.1.23).
05/29/2002 PHIL SEADER HANDICAP-SITE REVIEW Denied
05/30/2002 JIM EGAN FIRE REVIEW Denied

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
06/04/2002 TAMI ACHONG OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed