Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: SITE
Permit Number - T02CM02130
Review Name: SITE
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 05/07/2002 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | TO: Joseph Maher FROM: David Rivera 4849 E. Scarlett St. Senior Planner Tucson, AZ 85711 (520) 318-4757 FOR: Patricia Gehlen Principal Planner PROJECT: T02CM02130 Retail Shops 3809 N. Oracle Road Site Plan Review (1st review) TRANSMITTAL: May 7, 2002 COMMENTS: Please attach a response letter with the next submittal, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. This project has been reviewed for full code compliance (Greater than 50% building expansion.) as it pertains to LUC development requirements and criteria. The existing structure, which is to be demolished, was permitted as a Ramada/awning as indicated on the previous site dated 1984. Upon further discussion with Patricia Gehlen (Zoning Review Section Supervisor) she informed me that extensive research of the records related to this site did not provide any permits for the enclosure of the Ramada/awning. Unless permits for the enclosure of the Ramada/awning can be provided, this structure was enclosed without the proper approvals and inspections. The following Zoning comments must be addressed. 2. Based on the building dimensions for the existing structure and the proposed additions, the square footage must be revised on the plan and calculations block. The existing structure should be 986-sq. ft., the front addition should be 419-sq. ft. and the rear addition should be 136-sq. ft. Please review plan and revise as required. The gross floor area is measured from the outside walls of the structures. The total gross floor area should be listed as 1541 sq. ft. DS 2-02.2.1.A.6 3. Off street parking is based on the gross floor area (1451 sq. Ft.). Revise the parking calculation to indicate that the number of vehicle parking spaces required is eight (8) and the number provided is eight (8). This site has been reviewed for full code compliance based the greater than 25% expansion. Previous parking calculations should be disregarded and the applicable parking ratio (one vehicle parking space per 200 square feet of gross floor area) for the retail use should be listed. Revise the calculation as required. Clarify if the rear yard is to be used for storage, vehicular use, or other use. If the area is used by vehicles whether loading or unloading, the area must be paved. If the area is to be used for storage the area must be paved unless a forklift or similar vehicle is used to move items in and out of the storage area. Per a determination made by Jim Maurer 4/26/1999, as long as the storage area is used for storage of the products or materials used for the retail use and the area is accessed by forklift or similar moving machine, a minimum of two (2) inches of compacted gravel may be used for the surfacing of the storage area. The area will be restricted to forklifts or similar vehicles only. The storage area square footage must be included in the calculations and must be parked at the same parking ratio as the primary (retail) use. Parking or storage of vehicles in this area will require that the area be paved. DS 2-02.2.1.A.8 4. Per D.S. 2-08.4.1 Sidewalks. Sidewalks within a project must be physically separated from any vehicular travel lane by means of curbing, grade separation, barriers, railings, or other means, except at crosswalks, and must meet the following location requirements. A. At least one (1) sidewalk will be provided to a project from each street on which the project has frontage, unless there is no vehicular access from a street because of a physical barrier, such as a drainageway or an unbroken security barrier (e.g., a wall or fence). The sidewalk should be located to minimize any conflict with vehicular access to the project. B. Sidewalks must connect all areas of the development and must also connect to the pedestrian circulation path located in any adjacent street. C. D.S.2-08. 5.1 Sidewalk Specifications. Width. All sidewalks will be a minimum four (4) feet wide and will be installed to avoid any obstruction, which decreases the minimum width to less than four (4) feet. Composition. Sidewalks will be constructed of: 1. Portland cement concrete, four (4) inches thick, with a smooth or broomfinish; or 2. Brick pavers set in a bed of cement; or 3. Any surface equivalent in smoothness, hardness, and durability. Asphalt or asphalt concrete may be used only for jogging paths, nature trails which are part of an accessible route, and pedestrian refuge areas which are not required to be connected to the pedestrian circulation path, as listed in Sec. 2-08.3.1. Please provide a four feet wide sidewalk from both street right of way areas and connect to the on site sidewalk. The sidewalks must be handicap accessible. DS 2-02.2.1.A.12 and DS 2-08.4.1 5. Please label the size, and type of existing sign. See Engineering comments regarding objects greater than 30" to 72" in height within sight visibility triangles. DS 2-02.2.1.A.13 and DS 2-02.2.1.A.10 6. Based on the building square footage of 1541 one 12'x35' loading space will be required. Indicate the location of the required loading and demonstrate maneuverability into and out of the loading space. DS 2-02.2.1.A.14 7. If applicable, existing or proposed freestanding lighting location and type must be graphically shown on the plan. DS 2-02.2.1.A.25 8. See Landscape review comments regarding landscaped borders, screening and NPPO requirements. DS 2-02.2.1.A.27 9. Revise all affected LUC code calculations. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call David Rivera, (520) 791-5608. DGR C:\planning\dsc\T02CM02130.doc |
| 05/13/2002 | JOE LINVILLE | NPPO | REVIEW | Approved | BASED ON PC AERIAL PHOTOS EXCEPTION IS GRANTED. |
| 05/13/2002 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | BASED ON ZONING SECTION COMMENTS THE PROVISONS OF LUC 3.7 APPLY TO THE ENTIRE SITE. A LANDSCAPE PLAN WILL BE REQUIRED. DS 2-07. REVISE THE PLANS TO PROVIDE REQUIRED LANDSCAPING AND SCREENING. LUC 3.7.1.2 |
| 05/30/2002 | BLANCA ESPINO | FLOODPLAIN | REVIEW | Denied | See Engineering folder. |
| 05/30/2002 | BLANCA ESPINO | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | Site Plan 1. Indicate all existing and proposed buildings and structures, including finish floor elevation, roof slope and downspouts. D.S. 2-02.2.1.6 2. Indicate existing and future sight visibility triangles. D.S. 2-02.2.1.10 3. Indicate location, type, size and height of existing and proposed signage. D.S. 2-02.2.1.13 4. Indicate drainage patterns, proposed finish floor elevation(s) and finish grades. D.S. 2-02.2.1.16 5. Indicate estimated cut and fill quantities if applicable or not. D.S. 2-02.2.1.17 6. Indicate if streets are Public or Private. D.S. 2-02.2.1.18 7. Dimensioned right-of-way, including any applicable Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Plan right-of-way. Future right-of-way for Oracle Road is 150' having a 12' sidewalk area with a 6' sidewalk. D.S. 2-02.2.1.19 8. Refuse container location, size and access require to be upto code. D.S. 2-02.2.1.32 Drainage Report 1. A drainage report is required. This site is in a critical basin therefore detention is necessary to show a 15% reduction in existing flows for the 2-, 10- and 100-year peak discharges from the site. |
| 05/30/2002 | BLANCA ESPINO | SANITATION | REVIEW | Denied | See Engineering folder. |
| 05/31/2002 | JIM EGAN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 05/31/2002 | PHIL SEADER | HANDICAP-SITE | REVIEW | Approved |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 06/03/2002 | MONICA VALDEZ | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |