Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL
Permit Number - T02CM01015
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 05/30/2002 | DAVE WITT | BUILDING-RESIDENTIAL | REVIEW | Denied | PLAN CHECK COMMENTS - PROJECT #T02CM01015 5/30/02 708 E. UNIVERSITY BLVD. PLAN REVIEW FOR THE ABOVE REFERENCED STRUCTURE HAS BEEN COMPLETED. THIS LETTER REFLECTS COMMENTS TO BE ADDRESSED. IN ORDER TO FACILITATE A SHORTER BACK CHECK TIME, WE REQUEST THAT YOU PLEASE PROVIDE REVISED PLANS AND CALCULATIONS, HIGHLIGHTING ANY CHANGES, ALONG WITH A WRITTEN RESPONSE TO EACH OF THE NOTED ITEMS INDICATING ACTION TAKEN. SCOPE OF REVIEW: THE SCOPE OF THIS PLAN REVIEW COVERS ARCHITECTURAL, PLUMBING, MECHANICAL, MODEL ENERGY AND ELECTRICAL CODES. ALL CODE REFERENCES ARE TO THE 2000 IRC AND STATE PLUMBING CODE. ALL FEATURES WERE CHECKED ONLY TO THE EXTENT ALLOWED BY THE SUBMITTALS PROVIDED. ALL PORTIONS OF THIS PROJECT ARE ASSUMED TO MEET OR WILL MEET OTHER DEPARTMENTAL REQUIREMENTS, CONDITIONS AND CONCERNS BEFORE PERMIT APPROVAL. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS: 1. ALL CORRECTIONS AND REVISIONS SHALL BE MADE ON THE ORIGINAL TRACINGS AND TWO NEW SETS OF PRINTS OR (1) SEPIA & (1) BLUE LINE SHALL BE RETURNED ALONG WITH ALL REDLINE PRINTS. 2. PEN OR PENCIL CORRECTIONS ON FINAL PRINTS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTABLE. TO AVOID DELAYS ENSURE ALL CORRECTIONS HAVE BEEN MADE, ARE COMPLETE AND HAVE BEEN COORDINATED ON ALL APPLICABLE DETAILS AND NOTES. SITE PLAN 1. INDICATE THE LOCATION OF THE GAS ENTRANCE TO THE PROPOSED BUILDING. SIZE THE GAS LINE FROM THE METER TO THE TAP TO THE PROPOSED BUILDING. SIZE THE GAS LINE FROM THE TAP, TO THE PROPOSED BUILDING, TO THE EXISTING BUILDING. PROVIDE THE INPUT RATING OF THE GAS APPLIANCES IN THE EXISTING BUILDING AND THE TOTAL DEVELOPED LENGTH OF THE GAS LINE. STRUCTURAL PLANS: 1. DENOTE WHICH LINTEL IS FOR WHICH OPENING. 2. SHOW THE ENGINEER SPECIFIED CHANNELS (C6 X 13 ) AT THE GARAGE DOOR AND DETAIL THE CONNECTION. 4 . SHOW THE ENGINEER SPECIFIED LUS 28 JOIST HANGERS AT THE GLU-LAM. 5. SPECIFY THE WALL THICKNESS OF THE 4X4 METAL TUBE PER THE ENGINEER. 6. TRUSS JOIST MACMILLAN REQUIRES WEBB STIFFENERS. 7. SPECIFY THE WOOD POST CONNECTION AT THE FLOOR / CEILING. 8. THE WALL REINFORCEMENT SPECIFIED CONFLICTS WITH THE ENGINEER`S REQUIREMENTS. ALSO NOTE THE USE OF GRADE 60 #5 REBAR. PLEASE CHECK THE VERTICALS COMING OUT OF THE FOUNDATION ( SIZE @ SPACING ) . PLUMBING PLANS: 1. THE D.W.V. ISOMETRIC DOESN`T WORK. ( S-TRAPS &VENTING ) 2. GAS: PROVIDE THE LENGTH OF LINE TO EACH APPLIANCE, BTU DEMAND OF EACH APPLIANCE, SIZE OF EACH BRANCH, TOTAL DEMAND & TOTAL DEVELOPED LENGTH FROM METER TO MOST REMOTE APPLIANCE ON THE SYSTEM PER UPC 1217.2 3. WATER LINE: PROVIDE TOTAL FIXTURE DEMAND & MAXIMUM DEVELOPED LENGTH TO THE MOST REMOTE FIXTURE IN THE EXISTING BUILDING. MECHANICAL PLANS: 1. WILL THE RELIEF AIR 60 INCHES ABOVE THE FLOOR BE NOT OVER 12 INCHES FROM THE CEILING ? ELECTRICAL PLANS: 1. WHICH SUB-PANEL SCHEDULE IS FOR PANEL B ? 2. THE ELECTRIC RISER DIAGRAM DOESN`T WORK. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT YOUR ASSIGNED PLANS EXAMINER: DAVID WITT @ 791-5550 EXT. 110 |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 06/06/2002 | TAMI ACHONG | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |