Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: SITE
Permit Number - T02CM01003
Review Name: SITE
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 05/28/2002 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | COMMENTS: Please attach a response letter with the next submittal, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. CODE SECTION/DEVELOPMENT STANDARD 1. Copy of the lot combination covenant prepared by the City Attorney's Office must be recorded and submitted to the Zoning Review Section prior to site plan approval. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.2 2. The case number for the ERZ review must be noted in the lower right corner of each sheet of the site, landscape and NPPO plans. All required elements of the ERZ as shown on the approved ERZ plan must be added to the site plan, along with date of approval and any conditions placed on that approval. L.U.C. 2.8.6 3. All requested changes must be made to the site and landscape plans. D.S. 2-07.2.1.A |
| 05/30/2002 | JOE LINVILLE | NPPO | REVIEW | Denied | All elements of the Native Plant Preservation Plan must be prepared by a plant professional per LUC 3.8.4.4. Please include on the plan the name of person responsible for the plant data. Revise the transplantability and viability ratings in conformance with DS 2-15.3.2. The abbreviations and values used are not consistent with the City of Tucson standard. The plans contain references to Pima County codes and requirements, please revise the plans to respond to City codes and requirements. LUC 3.8, DS 2-15 |
| 05/30/2002 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | The floodplain and floodway lines as depicted on the site plan and native plant preservation plan must be accepted by the Engineering Section prior to approval. The locations of temporary fencing proposed on Sheets C1, C2 and N1 should be revised for consistency as required. LUC 2.8.6 |
| 06/17/2002 | ANY | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | To: Wayne E. Swan, P.E. Intertech 6089 E. Grant Rd. SUBJECT: Tag Elementary School, Site plan T02CM01003 (Second Review) T14S, R15E, Section 2 RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Site Plan The Site Plan (SP) cannot be approved as submitted. Please address the following review comments prior to the next submittal. Site Plan: 1. The Old Pueblo Archaeology Center's test excavation and preservation plan has been accepted. You must notify adjacent property owners of this decision; final decision is subject so comments from the affected neighbors. A copy of you notification should also be sent to the Development Services Director (Ernie Duarte) and the Ward 2 council office. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-5550 or pmachad2@ci.tucson.az.us Paul Machado Senior Engineering Associate |
| 06/17/2002 | ANY | FLOODPLAIN | REVIEW | Denied | See engineering folder. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 06/19/2002 | MONICA VALDEZ | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |