Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: T02CM00916
Parcel: 138100570

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: SITE

Permit Number - T02CM00916
Review Name: SITE
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
02/25/2002 JOE LINVILLE LANDSCAPE REVIEW Denied The refuse storage area, if located within 100 feet of an adjacent street must be screened from the street with a 6' masonry wall. Revise as necessary. Table 3.7.2-I

Retention basins must be landscaped per DS 10-01.0. The basin must also comply with LUC Sec. 3.7.2.7 which requires
dust control.

Revise the MS&R right of way location as necessary on the landscape plan. The landscape border must be located based on the MS&R ROW line. LUC 3.7.2.4.

Required elements of the irrigation plan include source of water, location of water meter and backflow-preventer.
DS 2-07

Screening is required per LUC Table 3.7.2-I for the parking areas located within 100 feet of Nogales Highway. Screens may only be located within street landscape borders if all of the provisions of LUC 3.7.3.2.C are met. Screens may not obscure the view of the landscape border form the street. LUC 3.7.3.2.B Clearly depict and label all screening. DS 2-07.2.2.

Additional trees are required for the northern interior landscape border. 1/33 feet is required (9 total). Trees are also required within the vehicular use area. Revise the landscape plan to provide the required trees. Trees located in the parkign area may be counted towards meeting the border requirement. LUC 3.7.2.4.
02/25/2002 JOE LINVILLE NPPO REVIEW Denied Submit NPPO Plan or application for exception. LUC 3.8
03/11/2002 JIM EGAN FIRE REVIEW Denied
03/11/2002 DAN CASTRO ZONING REVIEW Denied COMMENTS: Please attach a response letter with the next submittal, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed.
CODE SECTION/ DEVELOPMENT STANDARD

1. a) Per L.U.C. 3.3.4. "Multi-family Residential" parking requirements, the total number of vehicle parking spaces required are 25.
b) Note the number of vehicle parking spaces provided.
D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.8/ L.U.C. 3.3.4/ D.S. 2-02.2.2.A.4

2. a) Per L.U.C. 3.3.4 "Multi-family Residential" bicycle parking requirements, a total of two (2) Class II bicycle parking spaces are required. Please note the number and type of bicycle parking spaces required and provided.
b) Provide a fully dimensioned bicycle parking space detail on the plan. Refer to D.S. 2-09 for design criteria.
D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.9/ L.U.C. 3.3.4/ D.S. 2-02.2.2.A.4/
D.S. 2-09

3. Remove striped pedestrian paths located in front of unit 12 and units 3 and 4 since there is no sidewalk leading to the pedestrian paths.
D.S.2-02.2.1.A.12

4. If applicable, provide a detail of proposed free-standing signage on the site plan.
D.S. 2-02.2.1A.13

5. Please clarify the right-of-way dimension for Nogales Highway. Per the Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Plan, future right-of-way for Nogales Highway is 120 feet (60' half right-of-way). The plan indicates a 120 foot half right-of-way. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.19

6. If applicable, all existing or proposed easements must be shown on the plan including width, type, and recording docket and page reference.
D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.20

7. Label and dimension future curb location along Nogales Highway. Future curb is located nine (9) feet from future right-of-way line.
D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.21

8. All requested changes must be made to the site and landscape plans.
D.S. 2-07.2.1.A
03/18/2002 MIKE BERGHUIS FLOODPLAIN REVIEW Approved
03/18/2002 MIKE BERGHUIS ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied Reference Dev Std 2-02-2.1 for following comments:
1. Future R.O.W. & SVT's appear tobe in error. Future half ROW for NOG HWY is 60 feet. If existing half ROW is is 87 feet as shown, the future P/L and SVT should be removed . The correct future curb line should be sshown at 51 feet from C/L and a Future SVT also shown based on the curb line. SEE ZONING COMMENTS ALSO.
2. The new driveway should be shown with a 6 inch concrete header from P/L to Nogales Hwy pavement. Clarrify where Keynote # 21 is located.
3. Lot bearings are reqd. Lot dimensions are difficult to read.
4. Access ramps from parking to internal sidewalks are generally reqd--see H.C. comments.
5. Sheet 2 (pav/grading) spot grade elevations do not correlate with contour elevations. Please make a Large boxed in note on SHT #2 Noting the spot grade elevations set to 100.00 on the M.H. whose elevation is 2521.28.
6. Drainage Report states that no off-site flows impace the site. Please show how minor flows from Nogales Hwy are to be handled and how the South to North flows adjacent to the highway are maintained.
7. Earthwork Quantities should also be noted on the Paving/Grading Plan SHT #2.
03/18/2002 MIKE BERGHUIS SANITATION REVIEW Approved
03/25/2002 PHIL SEADER HANDICAP-SITE REVIEW Denied

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
07/18/2003 DELMA ROBEY OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed