Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: SITE
Permit Number - T02CM00885
Review Name: SITE
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 04/19/2002 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | TO: Sonora Expediting P.O. Box 89574 Tucson, AZ 85752 (520) 977-5990 FROM: David Rivera FOR: Patricia Gehlen Senior Planner Principal Planner PROJECT: T02CM00885 2917 E. Ganley Wholesale Use Group Site Plan Review (1st review) TRANSMITTAL: April 19, 2002 COMMENTS: Please attach a response letter with the next submittal, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. Off street Parking is based on the principle use of the property. Please revise the parking calculations to reflect that the parking has been calculated on the principle use of Wholesaling. See page 228 in the Land Use Code for the specifics. (Although sufficient parking has been provided based the calculation as shown on the plan the calculation should the actual ratio.) 2. Bicycle parking is based on eight (8%) percent of the number of provided vehicle parking spaces. Per LUC section 3.3.3.5, if the calculated number of bicycle parking spaces is less than two (2), the number of bicycle parking spaces required is two (2). Revise the bicycle parking calculation to state that two (2) bicycle spaces are required and two (2) will be provided. Both spaces may be class two facilities. Show and dimension the bicycle parking facility on the plan. The facility must meet the requirements of D.S. 2-09. If the facility is not visible from the street signage directing the cyclist to the facility must be provided. DS 2-02.2.1.A.9 3. If applicable, indicate on the plan the location, type and size of any existing or proposed freestanding signage, including billboards. DS 2-02.2.1.A.13 4. Demonstrate the maneuverability into and out of the loading spaces. Indicate on the plan the size and number of loading spaces required and provided. (Dimension the loading spaces.) DS 2-02.2.1.A.14 5. If Applicable, indicate the location and type of freestanding lighting. DS 2-02.2.1.A.25 6. See landscape review comments regarding possible landscape borders, screening, and NPPO requirements. DS 2-02.2.1.A.27 7. See Engineering comments regarding the location of the refuse container. DS 2-02.2.1.A.32 8. Add the following to the plan on sheet one. A. Gross Lot Area. B. FAR ratio allowed and proposed C. Number of Required and Provided vehicle and bicycle parking spaces including handicapped spaces D. Number and size of required and provided loading spaces E. Gross floor area DS 2-02.2.2.A.1-.6 If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call David Rivera, (520) 791-5608. DGR C:\planning\DSC\T02CM00885.doc |
| 04/22/2002 | JIM EGAN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 04/23/2002 | JOE LINVILLE | NPPO | REVIEW | Passed | Previously developed w/no PNP's. |
| 04/23/2002 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | All areas of the site, if not developed, landscaped or reseeded must be treated with an appropriate inorganic materal. Revisions to the plan are required where natural dirt is indicated on sheets C-1, C-2, and L-1. LUC Sec 3.7.2.7. This requirement also applies to the detention basin. See aditional comments related to required basin landscaping. The right of way area between the street property line and the street curb or edge of street paving must also be treated with an appropriate inorganic dust control material, such as decomposed granite. LUC Sec 3.7.2.4.A.3 Revise the plans to provide the required treatment. The site plan currently indicates natural desert shrubs wher none exist. Revise the notation as necessary. Retention basins are required to be landscaped per DS 10-01.0. aka the Stormwater Detention/Retention manual. Minimum standards include: 20 trees per acre, two shrubs per each tree, groundcover plantings and seeding and inert materials. LUC Sec 3.7.4.3. Revise the plans to comply with the development standard. |
| 04/26/2002 | PHIL SEADER | HANDICAP-SITE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 04/29/2002 | BLANCA ESPINO | SANITATION | REVIEW | Denied | |
| 04/29/2002 | BLANCA ESPINO | FLOODPLAIN | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 05/15/2002 | BLANCA ESPINO | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | Site Plan 1. Indicate the bearings along with the lot dimensions. D.S. 2-02.2.1.5 2. Revise the length for the Near sight visibility triangle to be 185'. D.S. 2-02.2.1.10 3. According to the estimated cut and fill quantities, a Grading Permit will be required. D.S. 2-02.2.1.14 4. Indicate if streets are Public or Private. D.S. 2-02.2.1.18 5. Refuse container location is not acceptable. Indicate new location, size and access thereto fully dimensioned. Demonstrate vehicle maneuverability. Refer to D.S. 6-01.10.0 Figure 1 & 2, D.S. 2-02.2.1.32 |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 04/29/2002 | LISA LESNY | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |