Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: SITE
Permit Number - T02CM00238
Review Name: SITE
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/16/2002 | JIM EGAN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | 1. SHOW LOCATION OF ALL EXISTING FIRE HYDRANTS. 2. SHOW LOCATION OF EXISTING UNDERGROUND FIRE SPRINKLER SERVICES TO EXISTING SAFEWAY AND "WALGREENS"( ADDITIONS CANNOT BE CONSTRUCTED OVER FIRE SERVICE WATER LINES) |
| 01/16/2002 | PHIL SEADER | HANDICAP-SITE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 02/01/2002 | BLANCA ESPINO | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Indicate property description as per D00-070. 2. Indicate project address. 3. Indicate lot dimensions and bearings of property. 4. Indicate all existing and proposed buildings and structures size in square feet, roof slopes, location of downspouts. 5. Indicate and label existing and future sight visibility triangles. 6. Indicate vehicular and pedestrian circulation clearly identified with arrows. 7. Indicate location, type, size and height of existing and proposed signage if applicable. 8. Fully dimensioned loading space(s) and maneuvering area(s). 9. Indicate drainage pattern flow, proposed finish floor elevation(s) and finish grades. 10. Indicate if streets are "Public" or "Private". 11. Dimensioned existing and future right-of-way, including any applicable Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Plan right-of-way. Please add the note "Scenic Corridor Note" as per D00-070. 12. All easements of record must be graphically shown on the plan together with recording docket and page reference. 13. Dimension from street monument lines to existing and proposed curbs, sidewalks, driveways and utility lines. 14. Indicate location and orientation of existing major physical features, such as railroad tracks and drainageways. 15. Indicate refuse containers location, size and access thereto fully dimensioned. |
| 02/01/2002 | BLANCA ESPINO | SANITATION | REVIEW | Denied | |
| 02/01/2002 | BLANCA ESPINO | FLOODPLAIN | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 02/11/2002 | DAN CASTRO | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | COMMENTS: Please attach a response letter with the next submittal, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. CODE SECTION/ DEVELOPMENT STANDARD 1. Since this is a less than 25% expansion of building area, the last approved site plan for this site must be submitted along with the new drawings. Additional comments may be forthcoming upon resubmittal of the revised site plan and last approved site plan. 2. Note the legal description of the site. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.2 3. Note the project address. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.3 4. a) Note the building height of the addition. Setbacks may not be verified for compliance until this information is provided. b) The building square footage noted under the site data block does not match the area noted on the site plan drawing. Revise to show consistency. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.6 5. Dimension the building setback from adjacent residential zoning. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.7 6. Vehicle parking calcualtion may not be verified for compliance untill correct building area is shown. See above comment number four (4b). D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.8/ D.S. 2-02.2.2.A.4 7. Provide existing and proposed bicycle parking calculation which states the number and type of bicycle parking spaces required and provided. Refer to L.U.C. 3.3.5.6.A.2 for shopping center bicycle parking ratio. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.9/ D.S. 2-02.2.2.A.4/ L.U.C. 3.3.4 8. Dimension PAAL width along the north side of the proposed expansion. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.11 9. If applicable, provide a detail of existing and/or proposed free standing signage and outdoor lighting on the site plan. D.S. 2-02.2.1A.13/ D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.25 10. If applicable, all existing or proposed easements must be shown on the plan including width, type, and recording docket and page reference. D.S. 2-02.2.A.1.20 11. Note the maximum allowed floor area ratio (F.A.R.) and proposed F.A.R. D.S. 2-02.2.2.A.3 12. a) This addition is located within the Scenic Corridor Zone. Please demonstrate compliance with the previously approved Scenic Corridor Zone requirements for the site. If compliance cannot be met, a new SCZ application will be required under separate review for this addition. Refer to L.U.C. 2.8.2. for requirements. b) The SCZ case number must be noted in the lower right corner of each sheet of the site and landscape plans. All required elements of the SCZ (i.e. 30 foot buffer, view corridors, approved colors, etc..) as shown on the approved SCZ plan must be added to the site plan, along with date of approval and any conditions placed on that approval. L.U.C. 2.8.2 13. All requested changes must be made to the site and landscape plans. D.S. 2-07.2.1.A |
| 02/11/2002 | JOE LINVILLE | NPPO | REVIEW | Approved | Previously approved exception. S99-012 |
| 02/11/2002 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | Please submit the previous landscape plan for comparison purposes. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 02/13/2002 | LISA LESNY | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |