Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: T02CM00209
Parcel: 137031050

Review Status: Stopped

Review Details: SITE

Permit Number - T02CM00209
Review Name: SITE
Review Status: Stopped
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
02/15/2002 JIM EGAN FIRE REVIEW Approved
03/26/2002 PHIL SEADER HANDICAP-SITE REVIEW Denied
04/01/2002 DAN CASTRO ZONING REVIEW Denied COMMENTS: Please attach a response letter with the next submittal, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed.
CODE SECTION/ DEVELOPMENT STANDARD

1. Full review of this project may not occur until the principal land use, development designator, and if applicable "subject to" sections of the site are noted on the site plan. Refer to L.U.C. 2.5.4 for land use class information, L.U.C. 3.3.4 for motor vehicle and bicycle parking requirements, and L.U.C. 3.4.5 for loading space requirements. Additional comments may be forthcoming upon resubmittal of this plan.
D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.31/ L.U.C. 2.5.4 L.U.C. 3.3.4/
L.U.C. 3.4.5

2. Since the site has been previously combined into one Assessors tax code, please remove interior lot lines from site plan.
D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.5

3. a) Vehicle parking spaces may not be verified for compliance until the principal land use is noted. See above comment number one (1).
b) Dimension wheelstops. Wheelstops must be located two and one-half (2 ½) feet from the front of the parking space.
D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.8/ L.U.C. 3.3.4/ D.S. 3-05.2.3.C.2/
D.S. 2-02.2.2.A.4

4. a) Provide a fully dimensioned bicycle parking space detail. Refer to D.S. 2-09 for design criteria.
b) Note the bicycle class type required.
D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.9/ L.U.C. 3.3.4/ D.S. 2-09

5. Label and dimension existing and future sight visibility triangles.
D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.10

6. a) Sidewalks must connect all areas of the development (i.e. storage building and office building) and must also connect to the pedestrian circulation path located along Nogales Highway. A striped pedestrian path may only be used when crossing a PAAL.
b) A five (5) foot pedestrian refuge must be maintained between the south side of the office building and the one-way PAAL. A four (4) foot wide sidewalk is required within the five (5) foot pedestrian refuge area.
D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.12/ D.S. 2-08.4.1.D/ D.S. 3-05.2.2.B.1

7. If applicable, provide a detail of proposed free-standing signage and outdoor lighting on the site plan.
D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.13/ D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.25

8. If applicable, all existing or proposed easements must be shown on the plan including width, type, and recording docket and page reference.
D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.20

9. Label and dimension the future curb location along Nogales Highway.
D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.21

10. Indicate the location of the refuse container.
D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.32

11. Note the maximum allowed and proposed floor area ratio (F.A.R). Carport does not count toward your F.A.R.
D.S. 2-02.2.2.A.3

12. All requested changes must be made to the site and landscape plans.
05/03/2002 MIKE BERGHUIS SANITATION REVIEW Denied
05/03/2002 MIKE BERGHUIS ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied 1) Full code compliance reqd, 58% exp- see Zoning comments 2) Drainage Rept reqd - Balanced basin, Qpost less than Qexist, Detention 3)Show drainage conditions on west side of NOG HWY, show no change 4)Show SVT'S at drive 5) Show future curb loc 6) Show site detention basin, flow arrows, metered runoff disposal from basin
05/03/2002 MIKE BERGHUIS FLOODPLAIN REVIEW Denied
05/06/2002 JOE LINVILLE LANDSCAPE REVIEW Denied Plans may not be reviewed unless a landscape plan is provided. The plan must include all content specified in Development Standard 2-07.
05/06/2002 JOE LINVILLE NPPO REVIEW Approved Exception per 1998 aerial photo.(PC)

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
08/09/2002 ELAINE ROSE OUT TO CUSTOMER Stop