Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: GRADING
Permit Number - T02BU03166
Review Name: GRADING
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/22/2003 | JIM TATE | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: January 22, 2003 ACTIVITY NUMBER: T02BU03166 PROJECT NAME: La Colonia Seis PROJECT ADDRESS: 446 N. Campbell PROJECT REVIEWER: James C. Tate, P.E. Resubmittal Required: Grading Plan Submittal Required: Flood Use Permit, Soils Report, Drainage Report, Stamped Approved Development Plan The following items must be revised or added to the Grading Plan. Please include a letter with the next submittal addressing how all the engineering and floodplain comments have been addressed. 1. A copy of the stamped approved Development Plan must be included with the Grading Plan submittal. A copy of the approved Drainage Report must be included with the Grading Plan submittal. 2. The Development Plan is currently in the review process. Any changes made to the Development Plan must be reflected on the Grading Plan. The Development Plan and Grading Plan must match. 3. A Flood Use Permit is required prior to Grading Plan approval. 4. Proposed grading in excess of 5,000 yards is designated "engineered grading" and a Soils Engineering Report is required. Provide. IBC Chapter 36 Section 9.3 5. The existing contour lines on the plan are discontinuous. It is not possible to discern existing elevations. Either make the lines continuous or label each section of line with an elevation. IBC Chapter 36 Section 9.4.2 6. Proposed fills in excess of two feet above existing grade at any location in the outer one hundred feet of the developing site adjacent to residentially zoned property require the procedure outlined in IBC Chapter 36 Section 13.1. The process must be complete prior to Grading Plan approval. Because the existing contour lines on the plan are discontinuous it can not be determined whether or not this ordinance applies (see comment 5 above). 7. Show a length dimension for the basins. The width is shown on the sections. This will facilitate Final Grading inspection. 8. Show the locations of Sections H, L, and M on the plan Sheet 2. 9. Include a note that all roof downspouts will be routed under any adjacent sidewalk. Sidewalks must be flood free for up to the 10-yr. event. DS 3-01.4.4.F 10. The Drainage Report specifies an 18 inch pipe connecting the two basins. Show and label this pipe on the plan and give invert elevation. James C. Tate, P.E. Civil Engineer |
| 01/22/2003 | JAMES TATE | FLOODPLAIN | REVIEW | Denied | See Engineering Folder comments. |
| 01/23/2003 | LOREN MAKUS | NPDES | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | At the time of this review, no Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan was required. When ADEQ issues the construction general permit, this project must be in compliance with that permit. |
| 01/30/2003 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | Zoning 2/3/03 Grading plans may not be reviewed and approved until a copy of the stamped approved development plan is included in the submittal package and Flood/Engineering has approved the plans. |
| 01/31/2003 | JOE LINVILLE | NPPO | REVIEW | Denied | An approved development plan including landscape plans is required prior to review. The grading plans should be revised as necesssary to match the development plan documents. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 02/04/2003 | ELAINE ROSE | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |