Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: GRADING
Permit Number - T02BU02737
Review Name: GRADING
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10/31/2002 | LOREN MAKUS | NPDES | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Provide run-off coefficient for pr-construction conditions. 2. Include a copy of the permit requirements/language. 3. Provide for a log of dates that construction activities begin and end. 4. Provide for a log of materials stored on site. 5. Describe the required content for inspection reports. |
| 11/04/2002 | PATRICIA GILBERT | NPPO | REVIEW | Denied | A pre-permit inspection is required to check the transplants, the protective fencing for the NUOS area and the scenic buffer. To schedule please call 791-5640, ext. 1140. |
| 11/05/2002 | LAITH ALSHAMI | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | Laith Alshami, Engineering comments, 11/26/2002 1- Add the missing numbers in the Scenic Route Case Number (SCZ-XXX). 2- Show the location of cross-section 2/3. Additionally, the width dimensions are different from the approved Tentative Plat. Justify the changes. 3- The Grading Plan does not call for the hydroseeding the slope, shown in cross section 7/3, as required by the approved Tentative Plat. Justify the change. 4- Include the project administrative address on the cover sheet. |
| 11/26/2002 | MICHAEL ST. PAUL | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | Engineering, Floodplain, NPDES and NPPO approvals required before Zoning review. |
| 11/26/2002 | LAITH ALSHAMI | FLOODPLAIN | REVIEW | Denied | Laith Alshami, Floodplain comments, 11/26/2002 1- Show the location of cross section 7/4. Include the slope percentage or ratio. 2- Show the location of cross section 1/4. 3- It has been the City's experience that grouted riprap with 6" mortar base does not last for long time which may require continious costly maintenace. We recommend increasing the thickness of the base. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11/26/2002 | DELMA ROBEY | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |