Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: T02BU02649
Parcel: 140410700

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: RESUBMITTAL

Permit Number - T02BU02649
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
11/08/2002 BLANCA ESPINO ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied Grading Plan
1. Call out perimeter walls (existing). Remove the section of the wall that goes across the driveway on the west side of the site (SHT C2 of 5).
2. Finish floor elevations and pad elevations do not match the approved Development Plan.
3. Provide existing contours around site to at least 25' from property line.
4. Sidewalk scuppers
5. Indicate a detail of all inlet/outlet, surface and subsurface drainage devices such as weir designs, pipes, spillways, etc. on the development plan and drainage report.
6. Indicate a dimension number on the cross sections where the word "VARIES" is indicated. When identifying a cross section detail, please flag or identify the structure on the development (site) plan. Details 1-3 need to be flagged out on plan.
7. Indicate if security barriers for ponding depths which exceed 2 feet and if slopes are greater than 2:1 and if pedestrian access is adjacent to basin.
8. Sheet C1 of 5, two FFE's are indicated for proposed building 6. Revise and correct FFE.
9. Keynote 7 indicates Type 2 Sidewalk scupper, please indicate height of opening.
10. Sheet C2 of 5, callout and identify the line between the south wall and top of berm.
11. Sheet C2 of 5, please indicate correct FFE and T/CON for Proposed BLDG 6.
12. Correct Keynote 17 to callout correct detail. Is it detail 8 or 10 of SHT C4? Indicate detail.
13. Keynote 25 refers to detail 14 of SHT C4, there is no detail 14 on SHT C4. Indicate detail.
14. Keynote 26 refers to detail 15 of SHT C5. Details overlay one another. Make corrections and identify each spillway with appropriate headings.
15. Keynotes 38 & 40 refer to detail 17 of SHT C5, there is no detail 17 on SHT C5. Indicate detail(s).
16. Sheet C3 of 5 calls out details A, B and C of C5, there is no detail C of C5. Detail B looks like it can be detail C. Detail A's elevations and FFE do not match the elevations and FFE on the grading (site) plan, please make corrections in all areas.
17. Sheet C5 detail 19, please callout filter fabric.
18. Sheet C5 detail B calls out FFE and T/CONC, please make corrections as per the approved Development Plan.
19. Sheet C5 detail B indicates two (2) storm drains, please callout and give dimensions.
11/08/2002 BLANCA ESPINO FLOODPLAIN REVIEW Denied SEE ENGINEERING FOLDER.
11/12/2002 MICHAEL ST. PAUL ZONING REVIEW Denied Engineering and Floodplain approvals required before Zoning review.

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
11/12/2002 DELMA ROBEY OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed