Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL
Permit Number - T02BU02552
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/08/2003 | LAITH ALSHAMI | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | Laith Alshami, Engineering comments, 01/08/2003 1- Provide the missing information (PLAN NO. __ - ____ - ___) in the title block . 2- parcel 133-10-0140 appears on the Assessors Map (see attached copy with the green card) to extend into Speedway right of way (ROW), which is different from what is shown on the Grading Plan. Verify that the owner will provide the proper dedication to the City to allow the shown 80' Speedway ROW. Additionally, the Assessors Map shows 75' Speedway half right of way. Verify what the existing half ROW is (75' or 80'). The second submittal did not include any information which clarifies this discrepancy. 3- Provide a detail which shows that the CUT and FILL slopes shall be 2' min. setback from the property line. Additionally, clarify where x-section E/3 is located and verify if x-sections E/3 and D/3 are in conflict. 4- It appears that lots 1 through 11 do not comply with the differential grading requirements. In order for the Grading Plan to be approved with the proposed non-compliant grades, the Developer/Consultant must satisfy the requirements stated in Section 13-Fills of Chapter 36 Excavation and Grading (Local Amendments of the International Building Code). Please see the excerpt of Section 13 which deals with this issue: "Placement of fill in excess of two (2) feet [or a finished floor elevation (FFE) in excess of two (2) feet plus the slab thickness] above existing grade at any location in the outer one hundred (100) feet of the developing site (less any intervening non-developable property outside of the site) shall require: a) Written justification based on engineering/technical reasons. b) Written permission of the Director of the Development Services Center (DSC) or his/her assignee. c) Notification of the property owner(s) adjacent to the fill site (with copies to the Council Office and the Director of DSC) prior to the approval of a grading plan. Said notification shall include reference to this ordinance, the justification presented as the basis for the excess fill, the approval letter from DSC, and the name, address, & phone number of the owner/developer and the engineer of record. This notification shall occur early in the development process. d) Preparation of a mitigation plan (i.e. additional setbacks, terracing, enhanced buffering/landscaping, etc.) acceptable to a simple majority of the notified property owners. The acceptability of the mitigation plan by the notified property owner(s) must be documented and made a part of the approved grading plan and permit. If the owner/developer and the notified property owner(s) cannot reach consensus on a mitigation plan within 15 working days of receipt of the mitigation plan by the notified property owners, the Director of DSC shall review the issues and information and then render a final decision." 5- Please be advised that for future grading plan submittals, horizantal control data for all lots should be provided on the plan. |
| 01/08/2003 | LOREN MAKUS | NPDES | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Block or otherwise provide sediment control for the bleed pipe from the sediment basin. 2. Update the plan if made necessary by changes requested by Floodplain/Engineering. |
| 01/08/2003 | LAITH ALSHAMI | FLOODPLAIN | REVIEW | Denied | Laith Alshami, Floodplain comments, 01/08/2003 1- The detention basin outlet private drainage easement is larger than the one shown on the tentative plat. The Fnal Plat shall reflect this revision. 2- Provide the proposed detention basin and Common Area "A" construction details (dimensions, materials and spillway rip rap thickness, etc.). The construction contractor must have sufficient information to build the detention basin. 3- Submit a revised on-site drainage plan to include in the drainage report addendum. 4- Submit a second copy of the drainage report addendum to file with the CDRC files 5- The floodplain use permit application is being processed. |
| 01/10/2003 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | Zoning 1/10/2003 Review and approval may not be done until Engineering/Floodplain approves the grading plans |
| 01/16/2003 | PATRICIA GILBERT | NPPO | REVIEW | Denied | Native Plant Preservation Pre-Permit inspection is required prior to issuance of permit. Upon verfication of required tagging, flagging and fencing call 791-5640 Ext. 1140 to schedule. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 01/22/2003 | DELMA ROBEY | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |