Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: T02BU02552
Parcel: Unknown

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: GRADING

Permit Number - T02BU02552
Review Name: GRADING
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
10/02/2002 LAITH ALSHAMI ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied Laith Alshami, Engineering comments, 10/10/2002

1- Provide the subject project administrative/site address.
2- Complete the number G-2002-XXX or remove it.
3- Complete the plan number in the title block.
4- Show the property dimensions and bearings.
5- Call out any perimeter walls.
6- parcel 133-10-0140 appears on the Assessors Map (see attached copy with the green card) to extend into Speedway right of way (ROW), which is different from what is shown on the Grading Plan. Verify that the owner provide the proper dedication to the City to allow the shown 80' Speedway ROW. Additionally, the Assessors Map shows 75' Speedway half right of way. Verify what the existing half ROW is (75' or 80').
7- What does the note (Public Right of Way Easement Dedicated by a Separate Instrument) shown on sheet 2/3 at the end of Street "A" cul de sac, mean?
8- Provide a detail which shows that the cut and fill slopes shall be 2' min. setback from the property line.
10/02/2002 LOREN MAKUS NPDES REVIEW Denied Provide signed operator certifications.
Include home construction in the sequence of major events.
Provide a site map with:
Drainage patterns
Approximate slopes after major grading
Areas of soil disturbance
Areas which will not be disturbed
Locations of control measures
Locations of places where stabilization practices are expect to occur
Location of off-site storage of material, waste, borrow, or equipment storage
Identification of watercourses
Stormwater discharge locations
10/10/2002 LAITH ALSHAMI FLOODPLAIN REVIEW Denied Laith Alshami, Floodplain comments, 10/10/2002


1- It appears that the private drainage easement for the detention basin outlet is larger than the one shown on the tentative plat. Verify that the easement size and configuration shown on the Grading Plan is the dedicated one.
2- Show the 50' study area fro Robb Wash.
3- Provide detention basin and Common Area "A" construction details (dimensions, cross sections, materials, spillways dimensions, etc.).
4- The top elevation of the detention basin is shown to be 72.5'. The Grading Plan shows the elevation to be 72.0'. Justify the discrepancy.
5- Weir details appear to be different from the drainage report.
6- Grouted rip rap details show 6" thickness. The City's experience that 6" thickness is not enough. Provide at least 8" thickness.
7- Cross section details shown on sheet 3/3 do not have enough construction details (dimensions and slopes are missing).
8- It is not clear where cross section C/3 is located on the plan.
9- Submit the required floodplain use permit application with the revised Grading Plan.
10/11/2002 JOE LINVILLE NPPO REVIEW Denied Approved tentative plat required prior to approval.
Native Plant Preservation Pre-Permit inspection is also required prior to issuance of permit. Upon verfication of required tagging, flagging and fencing call 791-5640 Ext. 1140 to schedule.
10/14/2002 PATRICIA GEHLEN ZONING REVIEW Denied Zoning
10/14/02 - Zoning will review once all other sections have approved the grading plans.

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
10/14/2002 MONICA VALDEZ OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed