Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Number: T02BU01454
Parcel: Unknown

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: GRADING

Permit Number - T02BU01454
Review Name: GRADING
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
07/02/2002 MATT FLICK ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied Most comments are drainage-related and have been placed in the "Floodplain" folder.
07/02/2002 MATT FLICK FLOODPLAIN REVIEW Denied 1. All detention/retention basins shall be graded to drain.

2. Provise a soils report or certification (in accordance with
Sec.14.2.6 of the Detention/Retention Manual) regarding
setback of structures from detention/retention basins and collapsibility.

3. Section G on Sheet 2 notes appears to be incorrectly
labeled with respect to location.

4. Eliminate 4" bleeder pipes as they defeat the retention volume requirement.

5. Indicate access point and 6:1 ramp for Basin 7.

6. Show more detail (where it daylights?) for channel which
outlets Basin 11.

7. Is Detail C/4 used for more than Basin 8? It appears to
also apply to the basin behind Lots 1-5.

8. Provide detailed grading information for the basin behind
Lots 22-32.

9. Install fence along Earp Wash study area boundary. Label fence to remain for duration of construction.

10, Indicate width of channel between Lot 27 and CA "A".
07/09/2002 LOREN MAKUS NPDES REVIEW Denied Please provide a signed project manager/owner certification.

Include Civil Engineer’s Arizona registration seal and signature on all plan sheets.

Include a description of the Intended sequence of major events.
Indicate the timing of installation and removal of erosion and sediment control measure relative to each activity.
Describe appropriate control measures for each activity.
Tell Which permittee is responsible for installation maintenance of each control measure.

Describe controls used to prevent solid materials from leaving the site (litter, construction debris, sediment).

Specify that inspection reports will contain the required information:
Name & qualification of inspector
Date
Major observations
Sediment removal if sediment trap’s design capacity is reduced by 50%.
If everything is okay, certification that facility is in compliance with SWPPP.
07/12/2002 PATRICIA GILBERT NPPO REVIEW Approved PRE-PERMIT NATIVE PLANT PRESERVATION INSPECTION APPROVED ON 7/8/02.

SALVAGE PERMIT ISSUED ON 7/8/02.
07/12/2002 MICHAEL ST. PAUL ZONING REVIEW Denied See Engineering and Floodplain comments.

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
07/18/2002 CINDY AGUILAR OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed