Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: REVISION - GRADING
Permit Number - T02BU00170
Review Name: REVISION - GRADING
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 02/19/2006 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | 02/19/06 Development Services Department Zoning Review Section David Rivera Principal Planner Comments: 1. The grading plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until it has been approved by the Engineering, and Landscape Review Sections. 2. Zoning will re-review the grading plan on the next submittal to ensure compliance with the CDRC approved and stamped tentativ |
| 02/26/2006 | ELIZABETH EBERBACH | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | TO: Pete Salonga, PE SUBJECT: Montage Vista II Revised road Floodplain and Grading Plan review LOCATION: 2905 W Speedway Bl REVIEWER: Elizabeth Eberbach ACTIVITY NUMBERS: T02BU00170, T06OT00211 SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Development Services Department has received and reviewed the Grading Plan submittal for Lots 70-73 access improvements and the private street grades, including SWPP report paperwork. Individual grading permits are required for each lot. The grading plan and floodplain use permit are not recommended for approval at this time. Address the following remaining comments: 1) Tucson Code Sec.26-5.2 and 26-11: Provide two copies of the drainage report with the resubmittal, as well as a copy of the approved subdivision drainage report. Provide the following discussion regarding lot access in the drainage report: Tucson Code Section 26-5.2(4): Per the Floodway Fringe Development section of the Floodplain and Erosion Hazard Management code, riparian habitats of watercourses and adjacent bank areas shall not unnecessarily be altered. Existing riparian 100-year floodplain limits exist on the site and only necessary disturbance will be approved. Discuss in the revised drainage report the necessary disturbance proposed and how it is the minimal disturbance necessary for the access to the lots over this natural wash area. Also, discuss why clear span bridges are not proposed. Also discuss why further disturbance is necessary for the additional rip rap areas. 2) On sheet C1, address the following comments: a) Provide a local benchmark with datum. b) Provide a cross section at cul-de-sac and to wash area depicting and clarifying the sidewalk, curb, and shy space if wedge curb is used. c) Revise General Note 2 to reference the grading standards DS Sec.11-01. d) Label dimensions of the for the proposed shared driveway (Lots 72 & 73) common access easement agreement, and provide recording information on the plan. e) It will be necessary to show topographic lines to clarify location of floodplain limits and thalweg. 3) Submit the following documents: a) Tucson Code Sec.26-42: Submit a copy of the SWPP plan sheet. The Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) shall be updated and meet the minimum requirements of the AzPDES Construction General Permit (CGP). b) A copy of the approved sewer plans. 4) The following conditions will be added to the grading permit once approved: a) Call for Pre-construction meeting. For a DSD Engineering Inspection, call IVR (740-6970), or schedule with a Customer Service Representative at the Development Services Department, or contact DSD Engineering at 791-5550 extension 2101, or schedule inspections online at: http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/Online_Services/Online_Permits/online_permits.html b) A Geotechnical Engineering inspection will be required prior to final grading inspection if any cut slopes steeper than 2:1(H:V) are constructed, per September 17, 2004 Rock Slope Evaluation Geotechnical Letter by LMT. Special Inspection would be required by Geotechnical Engineer for 1:1(H:V) slopes, or any slopes steeper than 2:1(H:V). Copies of the Geotechnical Evaluation would need to be submitted to DSD Engineering Division Inspector or office prior to scheduling Final Grading Inspection. c) As-built grading plans are required for the private street construction at final grading review for the subdivision. For resubmittal, provide three copies of the revised grading plan, the Floodplain Use Permit application, two copies of the drainage report, two copies of the soils report, a copy of the SWPPP, a copy of the approved grading and paving plans for Montage Vista II Subdivision, and any other supporting documents. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-5550, extension 2204. Elizabeth Eberbach, PE Civil Engineer Engineering Division Development Services |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 03/03/2006 | BETH GRANT | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 03/03/2006 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |