Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: SITE
Permit Number - T01OT00849
Review Name: SITE
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11/07/2001 | JIM EGAN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 11/19/2001 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: November 19, 2001 ACTIVITY NUMBER: T01OT00849 PROJECT NAME: 8A Builders Inc. PROJECT ADDRESS: 1101 E Palmdale Street PROJECT REVIEWER: Patricia Gehlen The following items must be revised on or added to the site plan. Please attach a response letter with the next submittal, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed: 1) Since this site is made up of portions of two separate lots, please provide a copy of the Zoning Review Section approved lot split and combo documents to verify City approval of lot reconfigurations. Since lot 1 is developed this is necessary to verify that lot 1 still meets all code requirements after the reconfiguration. A copy of the newly recorded legal description for this lot is also required along with a completed and recorded copy of the attached affirmation required by the City of Tucson (DS 2-02.2.1.A.2), 2) The address must be added to the site plan (DS 2-02.2.1.A.3), 3) West of building #2, the vehicle parking spaces are shown with a length of 15' yet the detail shows 15'6". The minimum is 15'6". Please revise the site plan (DS 2-02.2.1.A.8), 4) Revise the bicycle parking calculations to be based on the number of vehicle spaces provided not required. The type of bicycle parking proposed is class II not class I. Revise the calculations as required (DS 2-02.2.2.A.4), 5) Between any PAAL and wall, screen, or other obstruction, a minimum of two (2) feet must be maintained (DS 3-05.2.2.B.3). Revise the site plan as required (DS 2-02.2.1.A.11), 6) Any proposed gate which would block access to a loading zone must remain open during all business hours. Add a note to the site plan as required, 7) The sidewalk around building #2 must be concrete. The concrete sidewalk must continue north of building #2 to the northern most parking space. The pedestrian circulation system must be continuous between buildings #1 and #2 (DS 2-02.2.1.A.12, DS 2-08), 8) If applicable, all proposed free-standing signage and outdoor lighting must be detailed on the site plan (DS 2-02.2.1.A.13 and 25), 9) The final plat for this subdivision indicates an easement along the rear lot line which is not shown on this site plan. Please revise the site plan as required (DS 2-02.2.1.A.20), 10) The zoning north of this site must be added to the site plan (I-1) (DS 2-02.2.1.A.28), 11) The proposed uses must be clarified so the "subject to's" may be added to the general notes. Please specify the type of industrial and storage uses proposed and add the applicable "subject to's" to the general notes. The existing use must be added to the general notes (DS 2-02.2.1.A.31), 12) The development designator's must be revised. For all proposed uses the development designator is "34", 13) The allowed FAR must be revised to 2 under calculations. In addition, there is an mathematical error in the proposed FAR calculation (DS 2-02.2.2.A.3, LUC 3.2.11). |
| 12/03/2001 | MIKE BERGHUIS | FLOODPLAIN | REVIEW | Denied | |
| 12/03/2001 | MICHAEL ST. PAUL | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | |
| 12/03/2001 | MIKE BERGHUIS | SANITATION | REVIEW | Denied | |
| 12/03/2001 | MIKE BERGHUIS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | |
| 12/11/2001 | PHIL SEADER | HANDICAP-SITE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 12/17/2001 | MICHAEL ST. PAUL | NPPO | REVIEW | Denied |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 12/18/2001 | MVALDEZ1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |