Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: SITE
Permit Number - T01CM05889
Review Name: SITE
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 03/19/2002 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | Revise the plans to provide the the following LUC requirements:1) 5' screen along the southern property line. Table 3.7.2-I 2) 5' masonry wall required along the east property line. (specific use: parking/vehicular use area) LUC Table 3.7.2-I 3) Identify all existing/proposed plantings required to meet the standards for the Wilmot Road landscape border per LUC 3.7.2.4, include buffer dimensions. 4) Interior landscape borders are required for the north and east property boundaries. The exception does not apply. Remove the notes on sheet 2 of the landscape plan and revise as necessary. See sheet 2 of the site plan. 5) Screen walls may only be located within street landscape borders if all of the conditions of LUC 3.7.3.2.C are met. Revise the plans to meet the conditions. |
| 03/19/2002 | JOE LINVILLE | NPPO | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | The NPPO summary values for cercidium microphyllum and zizyphus obtusifolia should be checked and revised for accuracy. |
| 03/27/2002 | JIM EGAN | FIRE | REVIEW | Denied | |
| 03/29/2002 | DOUG WILLIAMS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | Provide signed/notarized permission from each affected property owner for the proposed offsite berm. Complete and submit a grading permit application with the next submittal for grading permit review/approval. Please note that a right of way excavation permit will be required for all proposed work in the public right of way - contact Permits and Codes, Department of Transportation. |
| 04/02/2002 | DOUG WILLIAMS | FLOODPLAIN | REVIEW | Denied | The drainage report is not acceptable for approval. The following comments are offered: For future submittals, provide a table of contents and page numbering in accordance with section 2.3.1.1 G of the City of Tucson Standards Manual for Drainage Design and Floodplain Management (SMDDFM). Delineate the limits of the 100-year floodplain adjacent to the new development, on the drainage concept. The onsite Q100 of 98.8 cfs appears to be receiving additional flow from the interior of this site and the contributing downstream drainage areas. Thus it appears there is regulatory flow on the north end of this project and, as such should be mapped and accurately depicted with corresponding water surface elevations as required. Depict and label all existing and proposed perimeter walls, adjacent to/within to this regulatory flow. Identify the obstruction in section E-E and E-1, between stations 20 and 25. Address conveyance of the 10-year storm under the sidewalk area at the basin outlet location and demonstrate no adverse impact will occur to the adjacent right of way/pedestrian area. A floodplain use permit will be required for this development - please complete the enclosed floodplain use permit application and include with the next submittal (a $50.00 permit application fee is required). In accordance in with section 26-5.2 (9), Tucson Code (Floodplain and Erosion Hazard area regulations), the lowest finished floor for new structures must be set a minimum of one foot abve the base flood elevation, where adjacent or within the 100-year floodplain limits. See redlines on plans (sheets 1 and 3). |
| 04/10/2002 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CITY OF TUCSON DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT ZONING REVIEW SECTION DATE: April 10, 2002 ACTIVITY NUMBER: T01CM05889 PROJECT NAME: St. Michael and All Angels PROJECT ADDRESS: 602 North Wilmot Road PROJECT REVIEWER: Patricia Gehlen The following items must be revised on or added to the site plan. Please attach a response letter with the next submittal, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed: 1) Copies of the originally submitted site plan must be included with the resubmittal of these plans for comparison purposes, 2) Legal descriptions for all lots and abandoned alleys must be added to the site plan. Please provide copies of the recorded alley abandonment paperwork with the resubmittal of these plans and added the recordation information to the site plan. Since this site is made up of several lots, the attached lot combination paperwork must be processed and recorded as required. The affirmation must be filed out, notarized, all legal descriptions attached, and the entire package recorded. Provide a copy of the recorded package with the resubmittal of these plans and add the recordation information to the site plan (DS 2-02.2.1.A.2). Although the response letter indicated information was included in the resubmittal package, it could not be located, 3) A lot area expansion calculation must be added to the site plan calculations (DS 2-02.2.2.A.1, 3, and 6), 4) The last approved site plan indicates that the existing GFA should be 38,518. The existing buildings shown on the site plan on sheet 2 of 7 do not added to a total of 38,518. The square footage of "building A" must be the same on the site plan and in the calculations shown sheet 1 of 7. Revise one or the other for consistency purposes (DS 2-02.2.1.A.6), 5) Revise general note 27 to reference building "B" instead of building "A". Provide two (2) sets of the approved LDO plans and a copy of the decision letter with the resubmittal of these plans (DS 2-02.2.1.A.7), 6) All PAAL's which are less than 24 feet wide must be designated one-way. Provide the width of existing parking spaces (DS 2-02.2.1.A.8), 7) The bicycle parking must be shown on the site plan fully dimensioned as detailed in DS 2-09 (DS 2-02.2.1.A.9). In addition, bicycle parking must be physically separated from vehicle use areas. Also, the site plan does not indicate sufficient area for 42 bicycle parking spaces as indicated by keynote 28, 8) Due to the percent expansion, a continuous on-site pedestrian circulation system must be provided on site. It must connect all rights-of-way which abut this site with all structures, outdoor areas, and vehicle use areas. This includes but is not limited to the new parking area and Brian Kent Street. Clearly demonstrate compliance on the site plan (DS 2-02.2.1.A.12), 9) Clearly identify the location and width of all easements located on this site. The new multi-purpose building is also being proposed over a Tucson Electric easement which is not permitted. The building must be relocated or the easement abandoned prior to approval of the plan. The recordation information for the abandonment must be added to the site plan if applicable and a recorded copy of the abandonment documents must be provided with the resubmittal of these plans (DS 2-02.2.1.A.20), 10) There is still an arithmetic error under the building SF calculations (38,518 + 10,428=48,946). All calculations (FAR, lot coverage, percent expansion etc…) must also be revised (DS 2-02.2.2.A.2 & 3), 11) The minimum site area for a K-8 school with 324 student is 10 acres. Prior to site plan approval, a Type V Administrative Procedure must be applied for and approved (LUC 2.3.4.3.D.1). The case number, date of approval, and conditions imposed must be added to the site plan general notes and compliance with all conditions demonstrated prior to site plan approval (LUC 3.5.3.7.B). |
| 04/10/2002 | PHIL SEADER | HANDICAP-SITE | REVIEW | Denied |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 04/10/2002 | MONICA VALDEZ | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |