Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: T01CM05412
Parcel: 117060690

Address:
435 E 9TH ST

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: SITE

Permit Number - T01CM05412
Review Name: SITE
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
11/14/2001 JIM EGAN FIRE REVIEW Approved
11/27/2001 DAN CASTRO ZONING REVIEW Denied COMMENTS: Please attach a response letter with the next submittal, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed.
CODE SECTION/ DEVELOPMENT STANDARD

1. Submit a copy of the site plan submitted to the Board of Adjustment (BofA). Additional comments may be forthcoming upon review of the site plan submitted to the BofA.

2. a) Provide copy of lease agreement for one (1) off-site parking space.
b) Per L.U.C. 3.3.7.2.C.1, motor vehicle parking spaces sized for compact vehicles are allowed only within the Downtown Redevelopment District.
D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.8/ L.U.C. 3.3.7.2C.1

3. Label and dimension sight visibility triangles on site plan.
D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.10

4. a) Per L.U.C. Table 3.3.7-I, minimum PAAL width to back out from a 90 degree parking space is 24 feet. Spaces 14 and 15 only have 16 feet.
b) Minimum PAAL width allowed per BofA variance is 19 feet on 9th Street frontage, site plan indicates 15 feet.
c) Minimum PAAL width allowed per BofA variance is 18 feet on 3rd Avenue frontage, site plan indicates 13 feet.
D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.11/ L.U.C. Table 3.3.7-I

5. If applicable, provide a detail of existing and/or proposed free standing signage and outdoor lighting on the site plan.
D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.13/ D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.25

6. If applicable, all existing or proposed easements must be shown on the plan including width, type, and recording docket and page reference.
D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.20

7. Label adjacent zoning classification (C-3) to the north and west of subject property on the site plan.
D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.28

8. All requested revisions must be made to the site plan, Landscape and NPPO plans.
D.S. 2-07.2.1.A
12/11/2001 DOUG WILLIAMS FLOODPLAIN REVIEW Denied NEED FLOODPLAIN USE PERMIT (NO "OK TO SUBMIT" FROM FLOODPLAIN?). FURTHER COMMENTS MAY BE FORTHCOMING, DEPENDING UPON FLOODPLAIN USE PERMIT CONDITIONS.
12/11/2001 DOUG WILLIAMS ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied ROW IMPROVEMENTS APPARENTLY HAVE NOT BEEN COMPLETED UNDER PHASE 1 REQUIREMENTS - DEPICT IMPROVEMENTS TO SIDEWALK AREA, CURB ACCESS RAMPS, ROW DIMENSIONING, ETC. AS REQUIRED UNDER PREVIOUS SITE REVIEW.
12/11/2001 DOUG WILLIAMS SANITATION REVIEW Denied DEPICT/CALL OUT SOLID WASTE PROVISION (STORAGE AND PICK-UP LOCATION).
12/17/2001 JOE LINVILLE LANDSCAPE REVIEW Denied The landscape plan must be revised to comply with the requirements of LUC 3.7.2.2. All plants must from the Drought Tolerant Plant List, except for oasis areas. Oasis areas may not exceed 5% of the street landscape border. Revise plans as required and provide calculations for any oasis areas.

Per LUC 3.7.4.4, The water feature may not exceed 1% of the net site area, the water feature must be located within an oasis area,the sum of the square feet of water surface area and the square feet of turf does not exceed the oasis allowance, water must be recycled in moving water features, and the feature must be designed to prevent seepage or leaking. Provide note and details as appropriate.

City Engineer approval is required for any right of way plantings, provide verification of approval.

Clearly identify landscaping installed as part of Phase I and proposed Phase II improvements. The plan refers to Phase I detail, provide detail number if applicable, plan and page number.
12/17/2001 MSTPAUL HANDICAP-SITE REVIEW Denied
12/17/2001 JOE LINVILLE NPPO REVIEW Passed Previously approved exception.

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
12/18/2001 MONICA VALDEZ OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed