Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: SITE
Permit Number - T01CM05386
Review Name: SITE
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 04/12/2002 | DAN CASTRO | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | COMMENTS: Provide a response letter with the next site plan submittal that states how all the Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. CODE SECTION/ DEVELOPMENT STANDARD 1. Affidavit and legal descriptions must be recorded and Pima County tax combination must be signed and approved by the Pima County Assessors office prior to site plan approval. Previous comment: Since this is comprised of more than one lot, a lot combination is required prior to the approval of this site plan. Please provide the following documentation to the Zoning Review Section for review: signed, notarized, and recorded affidavit (copy attached to the review comments), copy of recorded legal descriptions (Exhibit "A" in affidavit), and approved Pima County Tax Combination Form. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.2 2. Per L.U.C. 3.3.3.5, the number of required bicycle parking spaces is calculated as a percentage of the total number of motor vehicle parking spaces provided. Based on the number of vehicle parking spaces provided (37), a total of three (3) bicycle parking spaces are required. L.U.C. 3.3.7.8 allows the substitution of Class II spaces for Class I spaces. Revise the bicycle parking calculation on sheet C2 to the correct number of required bicycle parking spaces. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.9/ L.U.C. 3.3.4/ D.S. 2-09 3. a) Label and dimension future sight visibility triangles. b) Proposed 6' high masonry wall may not be located in a sight visibility triangle. Maximum height allowed for a structure in a sight visibility triangle is 30 inches. c) Keynote 25 on the site plan does not refer to an accessible parking sign as indicated in the keynote block. Revise as required. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.10 4. Dimension vehicle stacking spaces on the site plan. Previous comment: Label and dimension vehicle stacking spaces. The length of a stacking space is 18 feet. A minimum of six (6) stacking spaces including the space at the window is required for one (1) drive through lane. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.11/ D.S. 3-05.2.1.C.2.c 5. Since the monument sign is to be approved by separate permit please remove all references (graphic and note) to the monument sign. In addition, the monument sign appears to be located in the future sight visibility triangle. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.13 6. Revise the proposed use under the site information block to: Food Service "subject to" section 3.5.4.6.C and 3.5.13.5; development designator 30. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.31 7. Since the response letter for 1st review comments indicates that the billboard will be removed, verification that owner will be able to legally remove the billboard must be provided. Until verification is provided the plan must demonstrate compliance with Land Use Code Section 3.5.4.26. "Verification" would be letters provided to the City of Tucson by the property owner and billboard owner stating the billboard will be removed by a specific date. Verification must be provided prior to site plan approval. 8. Please note that the project activity number has changed to T01CM05386. 9. All requested changes must be made to the site and landscape plans. D.S. 2-07.2.1.A |
| 04/15/2002 | JOE LINVILLE | NPPO | REVIEW | Approved | Exception LUC 3.8.3.4.D per photos. |
| 04/15/2002 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | Please revise the plans as indicated below. If there are any questions regarding the following comments please contact Joseph Linville at 520 791-5640 Ext. 118. The plans will not be accepted for resubmittal unless the requirements are met. Per LUC 2.8.3.5. the MS&R right of way area (the area between the current and future right of way lines) can only be used if in compliance with the following: " An approved site plan (including landscape) is required indicating how the project will comply with LUC requirements when the MS&R right-of-way can no longer be used as part of the site. Such plan is to be an exhibit to an executed covenant for recordation stating the responsibility of the property owner, successor, or assignee as to the removal of improvements and compliance with the LUC at no cost to the City. Please submit a plan that complies with applicable LUC requirements or prepare a future site/landscape plan. Upon approval of the plan the covenant and exhibit must be recorded in order for permits to be issued. An example of the covenant is available on the Development Services website. http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/E-Services/Applications___Forms/Major_Streets_Covenant.pdf The site/landscape plans currently will not meet LUC requirements when the MS&R right of way area is no longer available as follows: 1. The loading zone screen wall conflicts with the sight visibility triangle. 2. The 5' screening shrubs encroach into the street landscape border in excess of the three feet allowed per LUC 3.7.3.2.C.2 along Grant Road. DS 2-06.3.7.B 3. The sign proposed within the Grant Road landscape border, as well as the 5' screening shrubs, will conflict with sight visibility requirements. Any screen higher than 30 inches must be located outside of the site visibilty triangle. LUC sec. 3.7.3.4. 4. Vehicles parked in the vehicular use area may not overhang the street landscape border. Revise the plans as necessary to eliminate this situation along the Grant Road and Palo Verde frontages. DS 2-06.3.3.E The screening location along Palo Verde Avenue should be revised in compliance with LUC 3.7.3.2.C. The screening shrubs appear to exceed the maximum allowed encroachment of three feet. |
| 05/01/2002 | BLANCA ESPINO | SANITATION | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 05/01/2002 | BLANCA ESPINO | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | Site Plan 1. Indicate if Grant Road and Palo Verde Avenue are Public or Private streets. 2. Keynote #25 needs to read correct description. 3. Any Cut and Fill over 50 cubic yards requires a Grading Plan review. You show Cut: 563 cy., Fill: 264 cy. |
| 05/01/2002 | PHIL SEADER | HANDICAP-SITE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 05/01/2002 | MATT FLICK | FLOODPLAIN | REVIEW | Approved |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 05/21/2002 | CINDY AGUILAR | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |