Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: SITE
Permit Number - T01CM05242
Review Name: SITE
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/03/2002 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1. A minimum 5' masonry wall is required on the west property line to screen the adjacent residentially zoned property from the commercial development. LUC table 3.7.2-I 2. All site improvements must be shown on the landscape plan, including parking areas (to determine tree planting requirements) and drainage structures. DS 2-07.2.2, DS 2-02.2.1.C 3. Clarify on the plans what is included in Phase 1, if the retention basin is to be constructed upon initial development of the site then the phase lines must be adjusted to include the improvement. DS 2-02.2.2.B 4. Retention basins must be landscaped per LUC 3.7.4.3. Landscaping must meet the standards contained DS 10.01.0 Revise the landscape plan to include the required landscaping. 5. Show the limits of grading on the landscape plan. All disturbed areas of the site not otherwise improved must be landscaped, reseeded, or treated with an appropriate inorganic dust control material. Provide information on treatments proposed for areas within the grading limits. Label the areas outside of the grading limits as undisturbed. LUC 3.7.2.7., DS 2-07.2.2.B 6. Revise the landscape maintenance note to refer to Sec. 3.7.6 as the code has changed. 7. A minimum of three trees are required for the vehicular areas based on the number of parking spaces proposed. Revise the landscape plan to include the required number of trees with the required minimum planting area and appropriate protection from vehicular damage. LUC 3.7.2.3 8. An appropriate dust control material, such as decomposed granite, is required in the area between the property line and the street curb. Add notation to the landscape plan. LUC 3.7.2.4.A.3 9. A minimum 10' wide interior landscape border is required along the west property line. LUC Table 3.7.2-I 10. The planting plan proposed appears to be in conflict with utility installations along the south property line. Clearly show all easements on the landscape plan and revise plan as necessary to eliminate conflicts. DS 2-07.2.2.E 11. Utility services must be screened with a 6' screen from Park Avenue. Revise the plan to include the required screening. LUC Table 3.7.2-I 12. Mechanical equipment must be screened completely from view from Park Avenue. Revise the plans to provide the required screening. LUC Table 3.7.2-I The mechanical equipment appears to be located in the same areas as the pedestrian circulation system. Revise plans to provide the required pedestrian facilities. Also see Zoning Section comments. 13. The landscape plan may require significant revision in order to comply with the Native Plant Preservation regulations LUC 3.8. Revise the plans as necessary. DS 2-15.3.4.B |
| 01/04/2002 | JOE LINVILLE | NPPO | REVIEW | Denied | Submit Native Plant Presrevation Plan. LUC 3.8, DS 2-15 |
| 01/11/2001 | MATT FLICK | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | Engineering/Floodplain/Solid Waste: 1. Drainage report must be approved prior to site plan approval. A portion of the site lies within a City of Tucson flood hazard area. An encroachment analysis must be provided if any development (which occurs above the existing ground surface) is within the floodplain. A chain-link fence is considered to be a solid obstruction. 2. Show the 100-year floodplain and erosion hazard setback. 3. The channel and detention basin do not match the actual grading limits. 4. Dimension adjacent drainageway (Nebraska Wash) and call out dedication information. 5. Show dedication information for Park Avenue. |
| 01/11/2002 | MATT FLICK | FLOODPLAIN | REVIEW | Denied | See comments in Engineering folder. A drainage report and floodplain use permit are necessary. |
| 01/11/2002 | MATT FLICK | SANITATION | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 01/28/2002 | PHIL SEADER | HANDICAP-SITE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 12/17/2001 | JIM EGAN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 12/26/2001 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CITY OF TUCSON DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT ZONING REVIEW SECTION DATE: December 26, 2001 ACTIVITY NUMBER: T01CM05242 PROJECT NAME: Leon's Automotive Exhaust Center PROJECT ADDRESS: 5418 South Park Avenue PROJECT REVIEWER: Patricia Gehlen The following items must be revised on or added to the site plan. Please attach a response letter with the next submittal, which states how all Zoning Review Section Comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed: 1) The sight visibility triangles do not appear to have been drawn correctly on either the landscape plan or sheet R1a. Refer to Development Standard 3-01.5.0 for specifics (DS 2-02.2.1.A.10), 2) The on-site pedestrian circulation system must be modified to raised concrete except where adjacent to overhead doors (DS 2-02.2.1.A.12, DS 2-08), 3) The proposed floor area ratio shown in the general notes must be revised to include the second floor (DS 2-02.2.2.A.3, LUC 3.2.11), 4) Resubmittal of these plans is not required. Please schedule an appointment with the reviewer for an over-the-counter review and approval. 791-5608. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 01/15/2002 | CINDY AGUILAR | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |