Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: SITE
Permit Number - T01CM04881
Review Name: SITE
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11/07/2001 | JIM EGAN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 11/23/2001 | DAN CASTRO | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | COMMENTS: Please attach a response letter with the next submittal, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. CODE SECTION/DEVELOPMENT STANDARD 1. Indicate which sheet is the site plan. If site plan is also sheet C1.1 "Paving Grading and Utilities Plan", please label as so. This review is based on information provided on sheets C1.1, C2.1, C2.2, and TS1. 2. List the legal description. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.2 3. List the project address. D.S. 2-02.2.1A.3 4. Label the height of each building on sheet C2.1. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.6 5. The number of vehicle parking spaces provided under parking calculation note on sheet TS1 does not match the parking table on sheet C1.1 Revise to show correct number. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.6/ D.S. 2-02.2.2.A.4 6. Provide a fully dimensioned Class II bicycle parking space detail which includes a minimum of five (5) feet of maneuverability in the front or rear of the parking space. Since the bicycle parking is to be located behind the admin. building, directional signage must be provided for bicycle parking. Refer to D.S. 2-09 for design criteria. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.9/ D.S. 2-09 7. a) Dimension the width of the pedestrian circulation system. b) On-site pedestrian circulation system must connect to 22nd Street right-of-way. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.12/ D.S. 2-08 8. If applicable, provide a detail of existing and/or proposed free standing signage and outdoor lighting on the site plan. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.13/ D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.25 9. If applicable, all existing or proposed easements must be shown on the plan including width, type, and recording docket and page reference. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.20 10. a) Label and dimension future curb along Avenida Los Reyes and 22nd Street. Per the MS&R plan, face of future curb for 150 foot right-of-way is located 12 feet in back of future right-of-way line. b) Revise 22nd Street perimeter yard note for street building setback under project data block on sheet TS1 to state correct required and provided building setback. c) Revise proposed building setback note under project data and site plan from Avenida Los Reyes to be based from face of future curb not existing property line. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.21/ L.U.C. 3.2.6.5.B.1 11. Revise zoning classification north of 22nd Street to R-1. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.28 12. Note the existing use of the property. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.31 13. Building square footage under project data block (9,455 SF.) does not match the building square footage on sheet C2.1 (9,727 SF.). Revise all applicable calculations as required. D.S. 2-02.2.2.A.3 14. This project is within the Environmental Resource Zone (ERZ). A separate review is required for the ERZ and must be approved prior to site plan approval. All required elements of the ERZ as shown on the approved ERZ plan must be added to the site plan, along with date of approval and any conditions placed on that approval. L.U.C. 2.8.6/ D.S. 2-13 15. All requested revisions must be made to the site plan, Landscape and NPPO plans. D.S. 2-07.2.1.A |
| 12/04/2001 | LAITH ALSHAMI | FLOODPLAIN | REVIEW | Denied | |
| 12/04/2001 | LAITH ALSHAMI | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | 1- Provide Basis of Elevation in the General Notes on the cover sheet. 2- Submit a drainage report that addresses threshold retention, 100-year floodplain, drainage patterns, scuppers, setbacks etc. 3- Dimension all proposed rip rap pads and proposed channels. 4- Address the need for drainage easements. 5- Provide the radii for the proposed headers at the entrances. 6- Complete the P12 number. 7- Provide the estimated cut and fill quantities. 8- Provide the school address on the cover sheet. |
| 12/04/2001 | LAITH ALSHAMI | SANITATION | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 12/10/2001 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | A 5' masonry wall is required along the east property line between the site and the residential property to the east. LUC Table 3.7.2-I The screening for the eastern boundary must be located on the property line . DS 2-06.3.7.C Revise all plans, placing the wall in the required location. Revise the Landscape, Native Plant Preservation Plans, and the Environmental Resource Report to show no encroachment within the 100 year floodplain as shown on Sheets C1.1, and C.2. DS 2-07.2.2 Development on this parcel is subject to Environmental Resource Zone regulations. If no encroachment into the 100- year floodplain is proposed the ERZ does not apply except that temporary fencing will be placed between the project site and the floodplain area. Revise all plans to indicate the required fence in the correct location. LUC 2.8.6.4 Clearly show and label the NPPO set aside area (NUOS) consistently on all plans. LUC 3.8.6.4.D 30 % of the site must be set aside in perpetuity as NUOS LUC 3.8.6.4.B To accomplish this the NUOS area may be designated as deed resticted portion of a privately owned lot or as a seperate parcel. To protect the natural area covenants which run with the land will be provided in favor of the City of Tucson. The covenants must provide for the perpetual preservation of the NUOS area. LUC 2.8.1.7 Submit copy of the covenants for approval and acceptance. After approval the documents must be recorded and the recording information must be added to the site plan prior to approval or issuance of permits. |
| 12/10/2001 | JOE LINVILLE | NPPO | REVIEW | Denied | See comments under landscape section. |
| 12/11/2001 | PHIL SEADER | HANDICAP-SITE | REVIEW | Approved |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 12/11/2001 | DELMA ROBEY | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |