Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: T01CM04729
Parcel: 11204375B

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: SITE

Permit Number - T01CM04729
Review Name: SITE
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
10/22/2001 JIM EGAN FIRE REVIEW Approved
11/01/2001 PATRICIA GEHLEN ZONING REVIEW Denied CITY OF TUCSON DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
ZONING REVIEW SECTION

DATE: November 1, 2001
ACTIVITY NUMBER: T01CM04729
PROJECT NAME: Dr. Love Chiropractic
PROJECT ADDRESS: 2828 East Ft Lowell
PROJECT REVIEWER: Patricia Gehlen

The following items must be revised on or added to the site plan. Please attach a response letter with the next submittal, which states how all Zoning Review Section Comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed:

1) Add the height of the existing building to the site plan (DS 2-02.2.1.A.6),
2) The sight visibility triangles must be added to the site plan (DS 2-02.2.1.A.10),
3) If there is a wall or fence along the west lot line, a two (2) foot separation is required between the PAAL and wall or fence. Please clarify or revise as required (DS 2-02.2.1.A.11 & 3-05.2.2.B.3),
4) Please detail of the new location of the free-standing sign on the site plan (DS 2-02.2.1.A.13),
5) If applicable, the location, width, type, and recordation information for all easements on this property must be added to the site plan (DS 2-02.2.1.A.20),
6) If applicable, please detail any proposed free-standing outdoor lighting on the site plan (DS 2-02.2.1.A.25),
7) If consistency, please add the zoning of the drainage way west of this site (C-1) and the properties south of the drainage way south of this site (R-1 and R-2) to the site plan (DS 2-02.2.1.A.28),
8) The percent expansion must be revised to 99% in the general notes (DS 2-02.2.2.A.6),
9) Keynote 5 could not be located on the site plan.
11/09/2001 MATT FLICK FLOODPLAIN REVIEW Approved Subject to requirements of Floodplain Use Permit No. 1329 issued on September 25, 2001.

Said permit prohibits the construction of new perimeter walls.
11/09/2001 PATRICIA GILBERT LANDSCAPE REVIEW Denied The development is subject the provisions of 3.7 of the Land Use Code. On sites where the gross floor area of the existing building is ten thousand square feet or less, and the expansion is 50% or greater the provisions of 3.7 apply. Applicable expansions are square footage of land area, floor area, lot coverage, and/or vehicular use area. The existing building is 1510 square feet and the proposed addition is 1500 square feet resulting in a 99% increase. Refer to LUC 3.7.1.2.B.2.b.

Identify the vegetation within the street landscape border to indicate compliance with the provisions of 3.7., including calculations of 50% coverage, dimensions of the street landscape border and if any existing screening occurs within the border.

A 30" screen for parking and street landscape border is required along Fort Lowell, a Major Street and Route. Refer to LUC table 3.7.2.I, 3.7.2.4. and 3.7.3.

Please indicate the square footage of landscaped area, dimensions of landscaped borders and calculations of the percentage of vegetative coverage within landscape borders. Refer to 2-07.2.2.A.2.

In the general landscape notes please change note 2 on sheet number L-1 to read City of Tucson rather than Pima County.

The grading plan refers to Cottonwood trees on site, where the native plant preservation plan depicts only mesquites on site. Please clarify.

Identify location, size and name of existing vegetation to remain in place on the landscape plan. Refer DS 2-07.2.2.A.e.

Identify location of water meter, main lines and sleeving for paved areas for the irrigation system. Refer to DS 2-06.5.4 and 2-07.2.2.C.

Indicate how the development will make the maximum use of on site stormwater for supplemental irrigation purposes. Refer to 3.7.4.3. and 3.7.4.5.B.
11/09/2001 MATT FLICK SANITATION REVIEW Denied Need copy of written agreement with adjacent property owner for use of trash bin on adjacent property.
11/09/2001 MATT FLICK ENGINEERING REVIEW Approved Grading plan required.

Site grading was reviewed and comments added to plan.
11/23/2001 PATRICIA GILBERT NPPO REVIEW Denied To reiterate from the landscape review, the grading plan refers to Cottonwood trees on site, where the native plant preservation plan depicts only mesquites on site. Please clarify.

If Populus fremontii, Fremont Cottonwoods exists on site identify location and size on the native plant preservation plan. Refer DS 2-15
11/29/2001 PHIL SEADER HANDICAP-SITE REVIEW Denied

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
01/02/2002 CINDY AGUILAR OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed