Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: SITE
Permit Number - T01CM04187
Review Name: SITE
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 07/30/2002 | DAN CASTRO | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | COMMENTS: Provide a response letter with the next site plan submittal that states how all the Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. CODE SECTION/ DEVELOPMENT STANDARD 1. Previous comments from the review done on October 31, 2001 have not been addressed. In addition, a response letter was not provided with this package. Please provide a response letter addressing the 1st review comments with the next submittal. 2. a) Since this is comprised of more than one lot, a lot combination is required prior to the approval of this site plan. Please provide the following documentation to the Zoning Review Section for review: signed, notarized, and recorded affidavit (copy attached to the review comments), copy of recorded legal descriptions (Exhibit "A" in affidavit), and approved Pima County Tax Combination Form. b) List the legal description on the site plan. c) This review is based on a less than 25% expansion of the vehicular use area. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.2 3. a) Square footage for (comm bldg. A) under required parking calculation does not match square footage for (comm bldg. A) under existing parking calculation. Revise calculation to show consistency. b) New site plan provides a total of 187 vehicle parking spaces while the parking calculation states that 166 existing parking spaces plus 29 new parking spaces are provided, totaling 195. Revise calculation for consistency. c) Dimension wheel stops on site plan. Wheel stops must be located two and one-half (2½) feet from the front of the parking space. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.8/ L.U.C. 3.3.7.2/ D.S. 3-05.2.3.C/ D.S. 2-02.2.2.A.4 4. a) Provide a fully dimensioned bicycle parking space detail. Refer to D.S. 2-09 for requirements. b) List the type and number of bicycle parking spaces required and provided on sheet A1.0. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.9/ D.S. 2-09/ D.S. 2-02.2.2.A.4 5. Far west PAAL width located near newly striped parking spaces does not meet the minimum 24 foot width. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.11 6. If applicable, all existing or proposed easements must be shown on the plan including width, type, and recording docket and page reference. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.20 7. Label and dimension the future curb along Stone Avenue. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.21 8. If applicable, provide a detail of proposed free standing signage and outdoor lighting on the site plan. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.13/ D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.25 9. Label adjacent zoning classification (C-3) for excluded parcel northeast of the subject property on the site plan. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.28 10. All requested changes must be made to the site and landscape plans. D.S. 2-07.2.1.A |
| 07/30/2002 | DAN CASTRO | HANDICAP-SITE | REVIEW | Denied | Refer to comments written on original site plan card by Phil Seader dated 11/13/01. |
| 08/08/2002 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | Submit last approved site/landscape plans. Review cannot be completed without these plans. Compliance with regulations in effect at the time the existing development received zoning approval is required. In addition, expansion areas are subject to the provisions of LUC 3.7. Plans will not be accepted for resubmittal without required plans. |
| 08/08/2002 | JOE LINVILLE | NPPO | REVIEW | Denied | Submit preservation plan or application for exception. LUC 3.8 Plans not acceptable for resubmittal without required information. OK to submit required. |
| 08/09/2002 | JIM TATE | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | Previous comments not addressed. Copy of the last approved site plan required. |
| 08/09/2002 | JIM TATE | SANITATION | REVIEW | Denied | See Engineering folder. |
| 08/09/2002 | JAMES TATE | FLOODPLAIN | REVIEW | Denied | See Engineering folder. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 08/12/2002 | LISA LESNY | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |