Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: SITE
Permit Number - T01CM04187
Review Name: SITE
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10/18/2001 | JIM EGAN | FIRE | REVIEW | Denied | |
| 10/18/2001 | ESTEVAN TINEO | FLOODPLAIN | REVIEW | Denied | Need Transportation Floodplain Review, see previous comments and attached letter. |
| 10/18/2001 | ESTEVAN TINEO | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | Previous comments have not been addressed. Please see attached previous comments. Sanatation has been rejected. Previous approval was based on one dumpster location, not three. The other two locations are not accessible. Revise. |
| 10/31/2001 | DAN CASTRO | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | COMMENTS: Provide a response letter with the next site plan submittal that states how all the Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. CODE SECTION/ DEVELOPMENT STANDARD 1. a) Since this is comprised of more than one lot, a lot combination is required prior to the approval of this site plan. Please provide the following documentation to the Zoning Review Section for review: signed, notarized, and recorded affidavit (copy attached to the review comments), copy of recorded legal descriptions (Exhibit "A" in affidavit), and approved Pima County Tax Combination Form. b) List the legal description on the site plan. c) This review is based on a less than 25% expansion of the vehicular use area. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.2 2. a) Square footage for (comm bldg. A) under required parking calculation does not match square footage for (comm bldg. A) under existing parking calculation. Revise calculation to show consistency. b) New site plan provides a total of 187 vehicle parking spaces while the parking calculation states that 166 existing parking spaces plus 29 new parking spaces are provided, totaling 195. Revise calculation for consistency. c) Dimension wheel stops on site plan. Wheel stops must be located two and one-half (2½) feet from the front of the parking space. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.8; L.U.C. 3.3.7.2; D.S. 3-05.2.3.C D.S. 2-02.2.2.A.4 3. a) Provide a fully dimensioned bicycle parking space detail. Refer to D.S. 2-09 for requirements. b) List the type and number of bicycle parking spaces required and provided on sheet A1.0. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.9; D.S. 2-09; D.S. 2-02.2.2.A.4 4. Far west PAAL width located near newly striped parking spaces does not meet the minimum 24 foot width. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.11 5. If applicable, all existing or proposed easements must be shown on the plan including width, type, and recording docket and page reference. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.20 6. Label and dimension the future curb along Stone Avenue. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.21 7. If applicable, provide a detail of proposed free standing signage and outdoor lighting on the site plan. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.13; D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.25 8. Label adjacent zoning classification (C-3) for excluded parcel northeast of the subject property on the site plan. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.28 9. All requested changes must be made to the site and landscape plans. D.S. 2-07.2.1.A |
| 11/08/2001 | JOE LINVILLE | NPPO | REVIEW | Denied | Submit preservation plan or application for exception. |
| 11/08/2001 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | Submit last approved site/landscape plans. Review cannot be completed without these plans. Compliance with regulations in effect at the time the existing development received zoning approval is required. In addition, expansion areas are subject to the provisions of LUC 3.7. |
| 11/13/2001 | PHIL SEADER | HANDICAP-SITE | REVIEW | Denied |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11/16/2001 | LISA LESNY | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |