Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESIDENTIAL BLDG/ZONING
Permit Number - T01CM02300
Review Name: RESIDENTIAL BLDG/ZONING
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/03/2002 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 01/03/2002 | DAVID RIVERA | NPPO | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 02/04/2002 | TERRY STEVENS | BUILDING-RESIDENTIAL | REVIEW | Denied | PLAN CHECK COMMENTS - PROJECT #T01CM02300 02/04/02 PLAN REVIEW FOR THE ABOVE REFERENCED STRUCTURE HAS BEEN COMPLETED. THIS LETTER REFLECTS COMMENTS TO BE ADDRESSED. IN ORDER TO FACILITATE A SHORTER BACK CHECK TIME, WE REQUEST THAT YOU PLEASE PROVIDE REVISED PLANS AND CALCULATIONS, HIGHLIGHTING ANY CHANGES, ALONG WITH A WRITTEN RESPONSE TO EACH OF THE NOTED ITEMS INDICATING ACTION TAKEN. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS: 1. ALL CORRECTIONS AND REVISIONS SHALL BE MADE ON THE ORIGINAL TRACINGS AND TWO NEW SETS OF PRINTS OR (1) SEPIA & (1) BLUE LINE SHALL BE RETURNED ALONG WITH ALL REDLINE PRINTS. 2. PEN OR PENCIL CORRECTIONS ON FINAL PRINTS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTABLE. TO AVOID DELAYS ENSURE ALL CORRECTIONS HAVE BEEN MADE, ARE COMPLETE AND HAVE BEEN COORDINATED ON ALL APPLICABLE DETAILS AND NOTES. SITE PLAN: 1. PROVIDE TWO COPIES OF A SITE PLAN INDICATING THE LOCATION OF ALL STRUCTURES ON YOUR PROPERTY. 2. PROVIDE DIMENSIONS FROM ALL STRUCTURES TO PROPERTY LINES, AND SHOW DISTANCES BETWEEN ALL STRUCTURES.------------SITE PLAN INDICATES 4'-10" FROM PROPERTY LINE TO PORCH, BUILDING PLANS INDICATE 4'-0" -------CLARIFY FOUNDATION PLANS: 1. NOTE ON THE DRAWINGS THE ALLOWABLE SOIL BEARING PRESSURE USED IN THE DESIGN OF THE FOOTINGS, OR STATE THAT THE ASSUMED VALUE OF 1500 PSF IS BEING USED, PER TABLE R401.4.1, A SOILS REPORT IS NOT REQUIRED. IT IS UP TO THE DESIGNER/HOMEBUILDER TO BE AWARE OF THE SOIL AND CONDITIONS OF THE SITE. IF SOIL TESTING HAS BEEN DONE, A COPY OF THE SOILS REPORT SHALL BE SUBMITTED WITH THE CONSTRUCTION PLANS, AND THE FOUNDATION DESIGN SHALL REFLECT THE SOILS REPORTS RECOMMENDATIONS. 2. PROVIDE FOUNDATION PLAN. 3. LOCATE AND DETAIL ALL FOOTINGS FOR THE FOLLOWING: - POSTS - COLUMNS 4. SEVERAL OF THE POST FOOTINGS AS CALLED OUT APPEAR TO BE INADEQUATE. STRUCTURAL PLANS: 1. SPECIFY DESIGN CRITERIA ON PLANS. VALUES FOR FLOOR DEAD LOAD AND LIVE LOAD, ROOF DEAD LOAD AND LIVE LOAD. 2. PROVIDE COMPLETE ROOF AND FLOOR FRAMING PLANS. SHOW SIZE, SPACING AND SPAN OF ALL FRAMING MEMBERS, TRUSSES, JOISTS, RAFTERS, BEAMS, GLULAMS, LINTELS, HEADERS, LEDGERS AND BLOCKING. 6X12 BEAM AT CARPORT IS INADEQUATE FOR LOADS IMPOSED 4X8 BEAM AT PORCH SPANNING 12' APPEARS TO BE INADEQUATE 3. COMPLETELY DETAIL ALL CONNECTIONS AND CROSS-REFERENCE TO THE FOUNDATION AND FRAMING PLANS: - RAFTERS TO BEAM - BEAM TO POST - POST TO SLAB - LEDGERS TO MASONRY, LEDGERS TO FRAME, FRAME TO LEDGERS - JOIST TO LEDGER - HANGER TYPES 4. NOTE AND DETAIL TIE STRAPS FRAMING ANCHORS AND JOIST HANGERS BY TYPE, SIZE AND REQUIRED ATTACHMENT TO FRAMING MEMBERS. 5. SIMPSON AB POST BASES ARE INADEQUATE FOR UPLIFT VALUES. 6. WHAT SIZE IS BEAM AT PORCH RIDGE?----------SINGLE 2X8 IS INADEQUATE. 7. PROVIDE COMPLETE CROSS SECTION OF REQUIRED 2HR FIREWALL AT CARPORT--------INCLUDING NO OPENINGS, PARAPET, HOW FIRE RATING IS ACHIEVED, CONNECTION DETAILS, ETC. 8. SLOPE IS INDICATED ON PORCH AND CARPORT BUT BOTTOM OF JOIST CALLED OUT DO NOT MEET MIN. SLOPE OF ΒΌ" PER FOOT ELEVATIONS: 1. NOTE AND SPECIFY ALL ROOF SLOPES APPROPRIATE TO MATERIAL (SEE R905). 2. ELEVATION DOES NOT SHOW CONNECTION TO EXISTING STRUCTURE AT FIREWALL FOR CARPORT SECTIONS - DETAILS - MISC. NOTES: 1. PROVIDE A BUILDING CROSS-SECTION. MORE THAN ONE MAY BE REQUIRED TO CLEARLY ILLUSTRATE HOW THE STRUCTURE IS BUILT. 2. PROVIDE DETAIL FOR BEAM TO CMU CONNECTION IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT YOUR ASSIGNED PLANS EXAMINER: TERRY STEVENS @ 791-5550 EXT. 112 |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 02/25/2002 | MONICA VALDEZ | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |