Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: T01CM02173
Parcel: 136010090

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: SITE

Permit Number - T01CM02173
Review Name: SITE
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
05/16/2001 JIM EGAN FIRE REVIEW Approved
06/07/2001 TOM WEIDEMAN FLOODPLAIN REVIEW Denied
06/07/2001 TOM WEIDEMAN ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied DATE: June 6, 2001


TO: J.C. Chinnock Associates
5420 W. Lazy C Drive
Tucson, AZ 85745

SUBJECT: T01CM02173
Tucson Meadows Park Expansion

RECEIVED: May 22, 2001

COMMENTS: The Site Plan and Drainage Statement have been reviewed and are not
approved - see comments below.

Site Plan Comments

1. Bk. 37, Pg. 29 called out on the cover sheet appears to be incorrect.
2. Show and call out the 50' linear park setback line.
3. The paving plans show drainage structures located within the 50' linear park setback area. Relocate the structures out of the setback area per City Managers directive stating no development in the linear park area.
4. Call out the refuse collection area. State what kind of collection canisters will be used. Provide any detail drawings necessary.
5. All hand placed rip-rap should show thickness twice that of the D50 shown. Make the appropriate corrections.
6. Provide appropriate sight visibility triangles at the street intersections per standard 3-01.5.0.
7. Sidewalk will be required along the street frontage per development standard 3-01.3.3.
8. Scuppers will be required in the sidewalk areas in lieu of depressed curb openings for drainage.
9. Provide elevations from the existing development located adjacent to this development.
10. Demonstrate how the offsite to onsite flows will be conveyed across the southerly portion of the development through the lots. Provide flow quantities.
11. Provide a typical lot drainage pattern detail.
12. Provide construction details and cross-sections of all drainage structures and drainageways. Include water surface elevations, slopes and appropriate elevations in relation to the development. Include the grouted rip-rap and filter fabric in the rip-rap areas per the drainage report. Provide the ADOT details also.
13. The plans should be resubmitted per the engineered grading requirements of the Interrnational Building Code since cut / fill quantities exceed 5000 cu. yds.
14. Provide the Pima County documents showing the dedication of the 50' linear park.
15. Call out the concentration points with flow quantities throughout the development.
16. Show Q100, DA at points of concentration.



17. Please be advised that the paving and grading plans were reviewed for site plan support purposes only and have not been approved as part of this plan submittal.


Drainage Statement Comments

1. Provide data that demonstrates the existing drainage structures located at the northerly end of the development are sized sufficiently to carry the flows from the proposed development.
2. Retention is required for this development regardless of the expansion size of the development. Retention is not covered under Criterion 1 as the drainage statement calls out. The City will waive the retention requirement for this particular development since all flows will dump into the Pantano Wash. Revise the drainage statement to correctly state why this development will not require retention.
3. Provide calculations for the scuppers required in the sidewalk areas.
4. Call out detention/retention basin and drainage channel inspection and maintenance policies as
specified in Section 1.5 and 14.3 of the City of Tucson Standards Manual for Drainage Design
and Floodplain Management.
5. A floodplain use permit is required since a portion of this development lies within a federally mapped floodplain.


Items Required: Revised Site Plan and Revised Drainage Statement
Re-submittal Required: Yes

If you have any questions on the above comments feel free to call Tom at 791-4942.

Reviewer: Matt Flick, P.E. Manager
Tom Weideman Engineering Section
Senior Engineering Associate
Development Review
06/07/2001 TOM WEIDEMAN SANITATION REVIEW Denied
06/07/2001 PHIL SEADER HANDICAP-SITE REVIEW Approved
06/19/2001 DAVID RIVERA ZONING REVIEW Denied
06/26/2001 JOE LINVILLE LANDSCAPE REVIEW Denied 1. A five-foot masonry screen wall is required between the specific use parking and the adjacent SR zoned property. LUC Table 3.7.2-I End

2. Specify a 6' screen for the south property line. LUC Table 3.7.2-I. End

3. One tree is required for each 33 feet of interior landscape border. LUC 3.7.2.4. Include required trees in the revised plan. End.

4. The Native Plant Preservation plan provides for transplanting 3 Chilopsis Linearis shrubs, this information must be included on the landscape plan. Clarify what is intended by "planted" in the Plant Key, does this mean existing or new plantings? End.

5. Indicate the spacing for the oleander shrubs. DS 2-07 End.

6. The vehicle use area adjacent to the Pantano Wash must be paved per LUC 3.3.7.3.
Barriers must be provided per DS 3-05.2.3.C. Revise plans to comply. End
06/27/2001 JOE LINVILLE NPPO REVIEW Denied 1. The entire site including property boundaries must be shown on the Preservation Plan aerial photograph. DS 2-15-3-1-A.3. End.

2. Add notes regarding tagging requirements based on DS 2-15.5.B. End.

3. Add note regarding replacement requirements. DS 2-15.4.D. End.

4. Add note regarding initial inspection (NPPO Pre-Permit). DS 2-15.5.B. Add note that instructs the contractor to call 791-5550 Ext. 118 to schedule. End.

5. The Salvage and Mitigation Report should address the items contained in DS 2-15.4.0. Including a note regarding the requirement for a licensed contractor. End.

6. The aerial photo and the inventory list require correction to provide consistent information such as numbering, designations, etc. End.

7. The minimum preservation requirements have not been demonstrated for Prosopis velutina. LUC 3.8.6.2.A.3. Revise plan to provide a minimum of 30% PIP or TOS. End.

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
06/28/2001 DELMA ROBEY OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed