Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESIDENTIAL BLDG/ZONING
Permit Number - T01CM01704
Review Name: RESIDENTIAL BLDG/ZONING
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 04/11/2001 | DAN CASTRO | ZONING | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 04/11/2001 | DCASTRO | NPPO | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 04/18/2001 | TERRY STEVENS | BUILDING-RESIDENTIAL | REVIEW | Denied | PLAN CHECK COMMENTS - PROJECT #T01CM01704 PLAN REVIEW FOR THE ABOVE REFERENCED STRUCTURE HAS BEEN COMPLETED. THIS LETTER REFLECTS COMMENTS TO BE ADDRESSED. IN ORDER TO FACILITATE A SHORTER BACK CHECK TIME, WE REQUEST THAT YOU PLEASE PROVIDE REVISED PLANS AND CALCULATIONS, HIGHLIGHTING ANY CHANGES, ALONG WITH A WRITTEN RESPONSE TO EACH OF THE NOTED ITEMS INDICATING ACTION TAKEN. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS: 1. ALL CORRECTIONS AND REVISIONS SHALL BE MADE ON THE ORIGINAL TRACINGS. RETURN ALL REDLINED PRINTS. THE FINAL PACKAGE SHALL CONSIST OF TWO DRAWINGS AND RELATED DOCUMENTS, ONE OF WHICH THE CITY SHALL RETAIN AND THE OTHER SET WHICH WILL BE STAMPED AND RETURNED TO YOU. 2. TO AVOID DELAYS, ENSURE ALL CORRECTIONS HAVE BEEN MADE, ARE COMPLETE AND HAVE BEEN COORDINATED ON ALL APPLICABLE DETAILS AND NOTES. SITE PLAN: 1. INDICATE THE LOCATION OF GAS, WATER, ELECTRIC AND SEWER OR SEPTIC LINE ON THE PROPERTY, AND WHERE THEY ENTER THE BUILDING. PROVIDE THE LOCATION OF YOUR WATER METER AND SEPTIC SYSTEM IF IT EXISTS. 2. IT APPEARS THAT A 6' PATIO WALL IS BEING CONSTRUCTED, IF SO INDICATED LOCATION, LENGTH OF NEW WALL, AND HEIGHT, ETC. FOUNDATION PLANS: 1. NOTE ON THE DRAWINGS THE ALLOWABLE SOIL BEARING PRESSURE USED IN THE DESIGN OF THE FOOTINGS, OR STATE THAT THE ASSUMED VALUE OF 1500 PSF IS BEING USED, PER TABLE R401.4.1, A SOILS REPORT IS NOT REQUIRED. IT IS UP TO THE DESIGNER/HOMEBUILDER TO BE AWARE OF THE SOIL AND CONDITIONS OF THE SITE. IF SOIL TESTING HAS BEEN DONE, A COPY OF THE SOILS REPORT SHALL BE SUBMITTED WITH THE CONSTRUCTION PLANS, AND THE FOUNDATION DESIGN SHALL REFLECT THE SOILS REPORTS RECOMMENDATIONS. 2. LOCATE AND DETAIL ALL FOOTINGS FOR THE FOLLOWING: ---EXISTING FOOTINGS AT RV CARPORT MUST BE LARGE ENOUGH TO CARRY ADDITIONAL LOAD---- SPECIFY SIZE, DEPTH AND REINFORCING-ADDITIONAL LOAD OF APPROX. 6500 LBS EACH --- NEW POST FOOTINGS AT PATIO ADDITION APPEAR TO BE INADEQUATE-CHANGE OR SUBMIT CALCS. STRUCTURAL PLANS: 1. FRAMING PLANS INDICATE WOOD POSTS BEING USED. ELEVATIONS INDICATE MASONRY COLUMNS. CLARIFY WHAT IS BEING USED. 2. PAGE 6 0F 17 HAS A CALLOUT FOR DETAIL 20 OF 17------THIS DETAIL IS FOR A TRUSS TO MASONRY WALL NOT A TRUSS TO BEAM-------CLARIFY 3. DETAIL FOR PATIO WALL DOES NOT INDICATE MAX. HEIGHT. FOOTING FOR A 6' WALL IS LARGER THAN INDICATED ON PLANS. WE HAVE A HANDOUT FOR 6' WALL INDICATING THE PROPER SIZE OF FOOTINGS AS WELL AS REINFORCING, ETC. 4. SPECIFY AND DETAIL ALL OVERFRAMING. IF SOLID SHEATHING IS USED ON THE LOWER TRUSSES, PROVIDE MINIMUM OPENINGS OF 22" BY 30" FOR ACCESS AND VENTILATION INTO OVERFRAMED AREAS (>30 S.F.). IF SOLID SHEATHING IS NOT USED ON LOWER TRUSSES, PROVIDE DETAILS FOR BRACING OF TOP CHORD OF LOWER TRUSSES. SECTIONS - DETAILS - MISC. NOTES: 1. ON STANDARD DETAIL SHEETS, CROSS-OUT ALL DETAILS THAT DO NOT APPLY OR WERE NOT USED. EXAMPLE: WHERE IS DETAIL 10 OF 15 BEING USED AS WELL AS 20 OF 17? IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT YOUR ASSIGNED PLANS EXAMINER: TERRY STEVENS @ 791-5550 EXT. 112 |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 04/23/2001 | MVALDEZ | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |