Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: SITE
Permit Number - T00CM06077
Review Name: SITE
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/04/2001 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | PROJECT: Colores Del Sol Apartments Complex 6th Avenue and Delta Road Site Plan Review (1st review) TRANSMITTAL: January 3, 2001 COMMENTS: Please attach a response letter with the next submittal, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. CODE SECTION/ DEVELOPMENT STANDARD 1. This parcel has been recently been replatted. Please add the new legal description of this parcel as described per the new Map and Plat. DS 2-02.2.1.A.2 2. In addition to the existing sight visibility triangles, the future sight visibility triangles must be shown for the driveway entrance along Sixth Avenue. Based on the Major Streets and Routes Plan Map, Sixth Avenue is designated as a major street and is projected to be widened to a total right-of-way width of 100 feet with 50 feet half right-of-way. Please show on the plans the future location of the curb and six-foot wide sidewalk. The curb location per the 100-foot cross section is to be located eleven feet from the property line. The back of the six-foot wide sidewalk will be located 2-1/2 feet from the property line. Revise as required. DS 2-02.2.1.A.10, DS 2-02.2.1.A.19 and DS 2-02.2.1.A.21 3. Clarify if the east side driveway entrance is strictly for the Fire Department use. If the tenants of the apartment complex are to be allowed to use the driveway as a second entrance and exit the minimum width of the driveway must be 24 feet for two-way traffic. DS 2-02.2.1.A.11 4. A sidewalk is required adjacent to any PAAL that provides access to a project. A four-foot sidewalk must be provided adjacent to the west side driveway entrance (PAAL). The sidewalk must connect with the sidewalk in the Sixth Avenue right-of-way. If Engineering section does not require a sidewalk to be constructed along the frontage of this property the sidewalk may terminate at the property line. The required sidewalk must connect to the onsite pedestrian circulation (sidewalk) either by crosswalk or abut the onsite sidewalk. All required sidewalks must be four foot wide and constructed of concrete or similar hardness. DS 2-02.2.1.A.12 and 2-08.3.0, .4.0, .5.0 5. If applicable to this project show the locations, type and size of all proposed signage. DS 2-02.2.1.A.13 6. The zoning classifications for the parcels across Sixth Avenue are C-2 and R-2. Revise as required. DS 2-02.2.1.A.28 7. Add to the "Site Development Data" block note 6, "Subject to L.U.C. 3.5.7.1.F. DS 2-02.2.1.A.31 8. The above comments are minor and the Zoning Review Section will not require a resubmittal for approval of the site plan if all the above comments have been addressed. Please ask for me when resubmitting the site plan. If major changes are required and made to the site plan as a result of comments by other review agencies a resubmittal of the site plan will be required. |
| 01/12/2001 | JOE LINVILLE | NPPO | REVIEW | Denied | Comments attached to card. |
| 01/12/2001 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | Comments attached to card. |
| 01/25/2001 | JIM JOHNSEN | FLOODPLAIN | REVIEW | Denied | See Engineering comments |
| 01/25/2001 | JIM JOHNSEN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | 1. The legal description in the lower right corner of the site plan sheets should reference 'El Despertar II (Block 1) Book ___, Page___' with the recorded book and page information completed. (Development Standard 2-02.2.1.A.2) 2. The future sight visibility triangles, future curb line and the future 6-foot wide sidewalk should be shown on sheet AS1 of the site plan. (Dev. Std. 2-02.2.1.A.10) 3. The consultant and the developer should be made aware that roadway widening improvements for 6th Avenue are planned as part of the City of Tucson capital improvements program, although such improvements are not currently scheduled for construction. At such time as improvements are scheduled for construction, an improvement district will be formed and the city and the neighborhood owners will share the cost of funding. 4. Please indicate on the site plan whether the sidewalk along Fontana Avenue is existing or is proposed to be constructed with this development. (Dev. Std. 2-02.2.1.A.12) 5. Please show the proposed site drainage patterns, proposed finished floor elevations, and finish site grades on sheet AS1 of the site plan. (Dev. Std. 2-02.2.1.A.16) 6. All curb and/or edge of pavement should be labeled on sheet AS1 of the site plan, indicating whether each is existing or proposed. Also, all existing curb openings should be shown and any unused curb openings should be identified to be closed with this development. (Dev. Std. 2-02.2.1.A.21) 7. Existing topographic contours and the bench mark used for vertical information based on City of Tucson datum, including city field book and page number, should be provided on sheet AS1 of the site plan. (Dev. Std. 2-02.2.1.A.23) 8. The proposed perimeter wall along the north boundary should be noted with the wall opening specified in the drainage report for this development, including locations and size. (Dev. Std. 2-02.2.1.A.27) 9. While the turning circle at the east end of the development provides an adequate radius for solid waste collection vehicles, the sharp turn back to the west into the PAAL does not provide an adequate radius for maneuvering. Adequate solid waste collection vehicle maneuvering must be demonstrated on sheet AS1 of the site plan. All curb radii should be annotated, demonstrating compliance with Development Standard requirements. (Dev. Std. 2-02.2.1.A.32) 10. Please add a note to sheet AS1 of the site plan stating that landscaped areas are to be depressed 6-inches to maximize stormwater harvesting. (Land Use Code 3.7.4.5.B) 11. All proposed drainage channels should be shown on sheet AS1 of the site plan. 12. The detention/retention basin outflow structures should be shown and identified on sheet AS1 of the site plan. 13. Section 6 shown on sheet AS3 should indicate how the drainage channel proposed in the drainage report will be accommodated. |
| 01/25/2001 | JIM EGAN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 01/25/2001 | JIM JOHNSEN | SANITATION | REVIEW | Denied | See Engineering comments. |
| 01/26/2001 | PHIL SEADER | HANDICAP-SITE | REVIEW | Approved |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 04/09/2001 | TAMI ACHONG | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |