Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: SITE
Permit Number - T00CM04582
Review Name: SITE
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 03/16/2001 | JIM JOHNSEN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 03/16/2001 | JIM JOHNSEN | SANITATION | REVIEW | Denied | SUBJECT: Caridad Commissary 845 N. Main Avenue T00CM04582 The site plan for the subject development, received on March 8, 2001, has been reviewed by the Engineering Section and is not acceptable for approval. The following comments are offered: 1. The limits of the 100-year floodplain and water surface elevations for the regulatory flow in Second Street, as identified in the drainage statement for this project should be shown on the site plan. Contrary to the statement in the response letter to previous review comments submitted by the consultant, this comment is still applicable. (Dev. Std. 2-02.2.1.A.15) 2. The site plan cannot be approved until the issue of acceptable maneuvering access for solid waste collection in accordance with Development Standard 6-01 is resolved. (Dev. Std. 2-02.2.1.A.32) 3. The consultant and developer should be aware that a grading plan is required for review and approval prior to issuance of a grading permit for this development. (Uniform Building Code Chapter 33, 1994 edition) The above comments should be addressed on the site plan. Jim Johnsen Engineering Section |
| 03/16/2001 | JIM JOHNSEN | FLOODPLAIN | REVIEW | Denied | SUBJECT: Caridad Commissary 845 N. Main Avenue T00CM04582 The site plan for the subject development, received on March 8, 2001, has been reviewed by the Engineering Section and is not acceptable for approval. The following comments are offered: 1. The limits of the 100-year floodplain and water surface elevations for the regulatory flow in Second Street, as identified in the drainage statement for this project should be shown on the site plan. Contrary to the statement in the response letter to previous review comments submitted by the consultant, this comment is still applicable. (Dev. Std. 2-02.2.1.A.15) 2. The site plan cannot be approved until the issue of acceptable maneuvering access for solid waste collection in accordance with Development Standard 6-01 is resolved. (Dev. Std. 2-02.2.1.A.32) 3. The consultant and developer should be aware that a grading plan is required for review and approval prior to issuance of a grading permit for this development. (Uniform Building Code Chapter 33, 1994 edition) The above comments should be addressed on the site plan. Jim Johnsen Engineering Section |
| 03/21/2001 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | |
| 03/26/2001 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | Native Plant Preservation Plan or approved application for exception required. |
| 03/26/2001 | PHIL SEADER | HANDICAP-SITE | REVIEW | Denied | |
| 03/26/2001 | JOE LINVILLE | NPPO | REVIEW | Denied | Submit Native Plant Preservation Plan or application for exception. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 04/18/2001 | MVALDEZ | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |