Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: T00CM04537
Parcel: 10409028D

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: RESUBMITTAL

Permit Number - T00CM04537
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
10/23/2000 DOUG WILLIAMS FLOODPLAIN REVIEW Approved
10/24/2000 CBUFORD BUILDING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied SEE PRIOR COMMENTS DATED 9/ 26/00
11/01/2000 RANDY SCHULER ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied CITY OF TUCSON DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
ELECTRICAL REVIEW COMMENTS

DATE November 1, 2000
ACTIVITY NUMBER: T00CM04537
PROJECT NAME: Cellular Antenna
PROJECT ADDRESS: 510 W. Limberlost
PROJECT REVIEWER: Randy Schuler, P.E.
Second Review
E-1
1) Please clarify if the listing of the 100 amp panel will allow the installation of a 100 amp subfeed breaker. My experience has been that the largest size subfeed breaker allowed by the manufacturer is significantly smaller than the main. See 99NEC 110-3(b) requiring conformance with the listing and labeling of electrical equipment. New Comment: Not Addressed
2) The conduit depths depicted on the plan are incorrect. New Comment: Clarify the underground conduit detail. The electric utility provides a CIC, the remainder of the conduits serving the equipment are run exposed up the side of the building (not underground), the oneline still indicates a 1.25" RGS conduit serving the Power cabinet (which does not match the remainder of the plan), and the number of conduits depicted underground appears incorrect.
3) Plan sheets C-1 and C-2 indicate a 2.5" PVC conduit as the feeder to the power cabinet, page E-1 indicates a 1.25" RGS. In addition if PVC is utilized it must be schedule 80. I would also recommend that the PVC be painted with a latex paint to preclude the UV degradation of the conduit. New Comment: See new comment #2 above.
4) The services must be grouped together or provide justification for the 2nd service through 99NEC 230-2. Please note if the NEC will allow for the 2nd service provide placards and a common grounding electrode system. See 99NEC 230-2(e) and 250-58. New Comment: Not addressed.

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
12/06/2000 TAMI ACHONG OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed
12/06/2000 TAMI ACHONG REJECT SHELF Completed
12/06/2000 TAMI ACHONG APPROVAL SHELF Completed