Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: CELL TOWER/ANTENNAS
Permit Number - T00CM04537
Review Name: CELL TOWER/ANTENNAS
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 09/12/2000 | JOHN HOGAN | OPERATIONS | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 09/12/2000 | GLENN MOYER | PLANNING-CITY HALL | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 09/12/2000 | CRAIG GROSS | ZONING | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 09/12/2000 | JIM EGAN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 09/26/2000 | DOUG LAAKSO | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. PROVIDE DRAWING WITH MINIMUM 10 POINT FONT SIZE. 2. PROVIDE DETAILS AND MATERIAL SPECIFICATIONS FOR ANTENNA MOUNT REF. DWG C-1, C-3, INCLUDE CONNECTIONS AND WEATHERPROOFING AT ROOF. 3. PROVIDE LOAD ANALYSIS OF ROOF VS EQUIPMENT INSTALLED REF. DWG C-1. |
| 09/29/2000 | RANDY SCHULER | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | CITY OF TUCSON DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ELECTRICAL REVIEW COMMENTS DATE: September 29, 2000 ACTIVITY NUMBER: T00CM04537 PROJECT NAME: Cellular Antenna PROJECT ADDRESS: 510 W. Limberlost PROJECT REVIEWER: Randy Schuler, P.E. E-1 1) Please clarify if the listing of the 100 amp panel will allow the installation of a 100 amp subfeed breaker. My experience has been that the largest size subfeed breaker allowed by the manufacturer is significantly smaller than the main. See 99NEC 110-3(b) requiring conformance with the listing and labeling of electrical equipment. 2) The conduit depths depicted on the plan are incorrect. 3) Plan sheets C-1 and C-2 indicate a 2.5" PVC conduit as the feeder to the power cabinet, page E-1 indicates a 1.25" RGS. In addition if PVC is utilized it must be schedule 80. I would also recommend that the PVC be painted with a latex paint to preclude the UV degradation of the conduit. 4) The services must be grouped together or provide justification for the 2nd service through 99NEC 230-2. Please note if the NEC will allow for the 2nd service provide placards and a common grounding electrode system. See 99NEC 230-2(e) and 250-58. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/25/2000 | TAMI ACHONG | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 10/23/2000 | TAMI ACHONG | APPROVAL SHELF | Completed |
| 10/23/2000 | TAMI ACHONG | REJECT SHELF | Completed |