Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESIDENTIAL BLDG/ZONING/FLOOD
Permit Number - T00CM04383
Review Name: RESIDENTIAL BLDG/ZONING/FLOOD
Review Status: Completed
Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
09/05/2000 | PETER MCLAUGHLIN | ZONING | REVIEW | Approved | |
09/05/2000 | DOUG WILLIAMS | FLOODPLAIN | REVIEW | Approved | |
09/14/2000 | TERRY STEVENS | BUILDING-RESIDENTIAL | REVIEW | Denied | PLAN CHECK COMMENTS - PROJECT #T00CM04383 9/13/00 PLEASE ADDRESS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS. RESUBMIT TWO SETS OF CORRECTED PLANS. SUBMIT A COPY OF THIS LETTER , NOTING THE DETAIL AND OR SHEET WHERE THE CORRECTION MAY BE FOUND. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS 1. ALL CORRECTIONS AND REVISIONS SHALL BE MADE ON THE ORIGINAL TRACINGS AND TWO NEW SETS OF PRINTS SHALL BE RETURNED ALONG WITH ALL REDLINE PRINTS. 2. PEN OR PENCIL CORRECTIONS ON FINAL PRINTS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTABLE. TO AVOID DELAYS ENSURE ALL CORRECTIONS HAVE BEEN MADE, ARE COMPLETE AND HAVE BEEN COORDINATED ON ALL APPLICABLE DETAILS AND NOTES. FOUNDATION PLAN 1. NOTE ON THE DRAWINGS THE ALLOWABLE SOIL BEARING PRESSURE USED IN THE DESIGN OF THE FOOTINGS, OR STATE THAT THE ASSUMED VALUE OF 1,000 PSF IS BEING USED. 2. A SOIL REPORT IS NOT REQUIRED. IT IS UP TO THE DESIGNER/HOMEBUILDER TO BE AWARE OF THE SOIL CONDITIONS OF THE SUBDIVISION. IF SOIL TESTING HAS BEEN DONE, A COPY OF THE SOILS REPORT SHALL BE SUBMITTED WITH THE CONSTRUCTION PLANS AND THE FOUNDATION DESIGN SHALL REFLECT SOIL REPORT RECOMMENDATIONS. 3. DIMENSION THE STEM WALL THICKNESS FOR OPTIONAL FOOTING DETAIL. STRUCTURAL 1. SUPPORT FOR ROOF AT NOOK MISSING WHEN CMU WALL IS REMOVED ------INDICATE BEAM, SIZE AND CONNECTIONS 2. CEILING HEIGHTS ON CROSS SECTION DOES NOT EQUAL A 3/8" PER FOOT SLOPE FOR ROOF PLUMBING PLAN 1. NOTE AND SPECIFY ALL PIPING MATERIALS. 2. GAS: PROVIDE THE LENGTH OF LINE TO EACH APPLIANCE, BTU DEMAND OF EACH APPLIANCE, SIZE OF EACH BRANCH, TOTAL DEMAND AND SIZE OF THE METER. 3. NOTE ON PLAN COMPLIANCE WITH WATER CONSERVATION; WATER CLOSETS 1.6 GALLONS PER FLUSH, SINKS AND SHOWER HEADS 3 GALLONS PER MINUTE. UPC CH.15 W/LOCAL MODIFICATIONS. 4. PROVIDE PRESSURE AND TEMPERATURE RELIEF VALVE AT WATERHEATER (UPC SEC. 608.3) 5. NOTE ON PLANS THAT SHOWER AND TUB / SHOWER COMBINATIONS THAT HAVE INDIVIDUAL CONTROL VALVES SHALL BE OF THE PRESSURE BALANCE OR THERMOSTATIC MIXING VALVE TYPE. PER. U.P.C. 410.7 MECHANICAL 1. IS FURNACE BEING RELOCATED OR IS NEW FURNACE IN ADDITION TO EXISTING FURNACE--------IF DWELLING WILL HAVE TWO FURNACES THEY CANNOT BE TIED TOGETHER USING THE SAME DUCT WORK--------IF ONLY ONE FURNACE IS BEING USED WHERE IS IT BEING RELOCATED FROM 2. SHOW EXHAUST FAN LOCATIONS FOR BATHROOMS, WATER CLOSET COMPARTMENTS, AND LAUNDRY ROOMS IN LIEU OF OPERABLE WINDOWS. UBC SEC 1203 REQUIRED FOR EXISTING BATHROOM ELECTRICAL 1. NOTE THE LOCATION, TYPE AND AMPACITY OF THE PANEL, NOTE THE GROUNDING AND BONDING METHOD. 2. A RECEPTACLE OUTLET SHALL BE PROVIDED ADJACENT TO THE BASIN IN EACH BATHROOM. (N.E.C. ART.210-52). BATHROOM OUTLETS SHALL BE ON A SEPARATE 20 AMP CIRCUIT WITH NO OTHER OUTLETS (NEC ART. 210-52(d)). G.F.C.I. PROTECTION REQUIRED. 3. SUBMIT PANEL SCHEDULE SHOWING CIRCUIT AMPACITY, WIRE SIZES, PANEL SIZE AND CIRCUIT NUMBERS.--------CROSS REFERENCE PANEL SCHEDULE TO ELECTRICAL PLAN 4. SUBMIT ELECTRICAL RISER DIAGRAM. 5. PROVIDE FEEDER SIZES, LOCATION, SIZE, AND LOCATION OF SUB PANEL MISCELLANEOUS 1. PROVIDE MODEL ENERGY CALCULATIONS.---REQUIRED WHEN ADDITION IS IN EXCESS OF 20% OF EXISTING STRUCTURE 2. CALL OUT ON THE PLANS THE R-VALUES OF INSULATION, AS WELL AS THE U-VALUES OF THE WINDOWS IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE M.E.C. CALC'S PROVIDED. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT YOUR ASSIGNED PLANS EXAMINER: TERRY STEVENS: @ 791-5550 EXT. 112 |
09/18/2000 | JOE LINVILLE | NPPO | REVIEW | Passed | |
09/19/2000 | RAY MORGAN | WWM | REVIEW | Approved |
Final Status
Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
---|---|---|---|
10/25/2000 | CLAUDIA BUFORD | APPROVAL SHELF | Passed |
10/25/2000 | CLAUDIA BUFORD | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Passed |
09/29/2000 | DELMA ROBEY | REJECT SHELF | Passed |