Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Number: T00CM03233
Parcel: 11301098C

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: RESUBMITTAL

Permit Number - T00CM03233
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
01/02/2001 JOE LINVILLE LANDSCAPE REVIEW Approved
01/22/2001 DOUG WILLIAMS ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied
01/25/2001 DOUG WILLIAMS SANITATION REVIEW Approved
01/25/2001 DOUG WILLIAMS FLOODPLAIN REVIEW Denied
01/25/2001 PHIL SEADER HANDICAP-SITE REVIEW Approved
12/20/2000 DAVID RIVERA ZONING REVIEW Denied 1. A Lot Development Option will be required for the proposed property line to carport setbacks as shown on the plan. If the adjacent owner's who will be affected by the reduction of the building setbacks as proposed on the plan have no objection, a statement with the owner's signature and address may be added to the plan. The Lot Development Option will not be required. A sample copy of the type of statement that should be added to the plan is attached. If the adjacent owners do not agree to the carport locations as proposed on the plan a Lot Development Option will be required. A request for a reduction of the building setback for the proposed carports must be applied for. The required building setback for the proposed carports is one and one-half the height of the structure the greatest of the two. At a minimum assuming the carport does not exceed nine feet in height the setback must be thirteen (13) feet six (6) inches. Provide the height of the carport structures in order to address the required building setback and request for a setback reduction.

The previous plan showed the proposed carports at zero (0) feet setback. The resubmittal drawing indicates that the carports are to be placed three feet from the property line. A lot development option will be required. Per DS 3-05.2.2.B.2 a minimum distance of one (1) foot must be maintained between an open structure such as a carport and a PAAL. The distance is measured to closest part of the structure i.e. a roof overhang. The carport overhang should be placed so that a one (1) foot separation from the end or back end of the parking space and the PAAL is provided. (Previous Comment: The building setbacks from the North and East property lines must be provided for the covered parking structures. All detached structures must comply with the same setback as the principal structure. If the setback for the covered parking structures is to remain at zero (0) feet setback the signature of the adjacent owners to the North and the East property lines must provide a statement along with their signature and address on the plans. See attached sample of a statement to be provided on the plans. Refer to the Commercial Structural Reviewer comments regarding firewall wall issues for the carports adjacent to the property lines. A cross section drawing will be required prior to approval of permits for the carports. The carport drawing was not provided with the site plan submittal and is assumed that a separate permit will be applied for. If the carports are to be constructed as part of the building

DS 2-02.2.1.7
2. Sheet AS1 was not included in the site plan submittal package therefore the class 1 and class 2 facilities cannot be verified for compliance with the requirements of 2-09. A fully dimensioned detail drawing (plan view drawing) of both the class 1 and class 2 facilities must be provided. See DS 2-09 for requirements such as separation between bicycles, aisle width etc. (Previous Comment: Show the off-street bicycle parking, including materials for lighting, paving, and security; fully dimensioned layout; location; specific type of rack and the number of bicycles it supports; and the location and type of directional signage.
DS 2-02.2.1.9

3. Please ensure that any changes that are made to the site plan are made to the landscape plans.

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
03/21/2001 MVALDEZ OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed