Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: SITE
Permit Number - T00CM01910
Review Name: SITE
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 08/28/2000 | JOE LINVILLE | NPPO | REVIEW | Denied | |
| 09/08/2000 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | SEE ATTACHED COMMENTS. |
| 11/09/2000 | DOUG WILLIAMS | FLOODPLAIN | REVIEW | Denied | Drainage Statement Comments: 1. Correct the Time of Concentration for the more frequent flood events concerning Drainage Area E1. Utilize Equation 4.5 of the Standards Manual for Drainage Design and Floodplain Management (SMDDFM) and set the Time of Concentration for the 100-year event to 5 minutes. 2. Correct the Rise Time to reflect the corresponding Time of Concentration per Table 4.8 of the SMDDFM for the 5-year reservoir routing calculations. 3. Demonstrate that stormwater runoff from Drainage Area E1 is conveyed into the detention/retention basin. 4. Detention/retention basin percolation test results are required with the drainage statement. 5. Provide detention/retention basin dimensions, side slopes, bottom elevations, and cross-sections. Detention/retention basin inlets and outlets require erosion protection. 6. Provide the formula that was used to rate the detention/retention basin weir. |
| 11/09/2000 | DOUG WILLIAMS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | |
| 11/09/2000 | PHIL SEADER | HANDICAP-SITE | REVIEW | Denied | |
| 11/09/2000 | DOUG WILLIAMS | SANITATION | REVIEW | Denied | |
| 11/09/2000 | DOUG WILLIAMS | FLOODPLAIN | REVIEW | Denied | Eng/Fld Site Plan Review: 1. Show lot drainage with finish grades and drainage divides per the drainage statement. 2. Maximize stormwater harvesting by depressing the landscaping 6-inches. 3. Erosion protection is required at detention/retention basin inlets and outlets. 4. Show all onsite discharge points and offsite to onsite flow acceptance points with flow quantities. 5. Show and dimension all rip rap areas. Rip rap must be 2D50 thick. 6. Provide detention/retention basin dimensions, volume, side slopes, bottom elevation, 100-year water surface elevation, cross-sections, weir details, and inflow/outflow quantities. 7. Show future sight visibility triangles and right-of-way per the City of Tucson Major Streets and Routes Plan. 8. Provide estimated cut and fill quantities. 9. Show the contour interval with the north arrow. Furthermore, provide bases of elevation to include City of Tucson Field Book and Page Number. 10. Solid waste disposal (refuse) must meet Development Standard 6-01.0 specifications. 11. Dimension the PAAL return radiuses and provide concrete headers along the radius. 12. Show all utility easements including overhand power lines and power poles. Dimension utility lines from the street monument line. TBH |
| 11/15/2000 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 12/21/2000 | DELMA ROBEY | REJECT SHELF | Completed |
| 12/21/2000 | DELMA ROBEY | APPROVAL SHELF | Completed |
| 11/20/2000 | DELMA ROBEY | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |