Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Plan Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: LOT SPLIT REVIEW
Plan Number - S18-080
Review Name: LOT SPLIT REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 09/06/2018 | QJONES1 | START | PLANS BEING WALKED THRU | Completed | |
| 09/06/2018 | AHINES2 | H/C SITE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 09/06/2018 | ALEXANDRA HINES | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | FROM: Alexandra Hines, Lead Planner PROJECT: S18-080 (revise DP18-0050 to reflect) TRANSMITTAL: September 6, 2018 COMMENTS: Reciprocal Access Agreement provide and to be recorded with lot split. The following comments are relative to an application for a Design Development Option (DDO) (UDC 3.11.1). This site is located in the R-2 zone (UDC 4.7.9). Multi-family residential is a permitted use in this zone (Table 4.8-2). See Use Specific Standards 4.9.7.B.6, .9 & .10. The minimum setback is the greater of six (6) feet, or three-fourths (3/4) the height of the structure's wall facing each interior property line (Table 6.3-2.A). The minimum setback to the front street perimeter property line is the greater of twenty (20) feet, or one and one-half (1 ½) the height of the proposed wall (UDC 6.4.5.C.1.a). The proposed setback is: Thirteen (13) feet from east property line (proposed in S18-080), required is fourteen (14) feet for Lot 1 (east lot). Thirteen (13) feet from west property line (proposed in S18-080), required is fourteen (14) feet for Lot 2 (west lot). |
| 09/06/2018 | ALEXANDRA HINES | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | ZONING REVIEW TRANSMITTAL FROM: Elisa Hamblin, AICP Lead Planner PROJECT: S18-080 (revise DP18-0050 to reflect) 1129 E 7th St The Graymont TRANSMITTAL: September 20, 2018 COMMENTS: the following comments are relative to an application for a Design Development Option (DDO) (UDC 3.11.1). This site is located in the R-2 zone (UDC 4.7.9). Multi-family residential is a permitted use in this zone (Table 4.8-2). See Use-Specific Standards 4.9.7.B.6., .9 and .10. The minimum setback is the greater of six (6) feet, or two-thirds (2/3) the height of the structure's wall facing each interior property line (Table 6.3-2.A). The minimum setback to the front street perimeter property line is the greater of twenty (20) feet, or one and one-half (1 ½) the height of the proposed wall ((UDC 6.4.5.C.1.a). The proposed setback is: " Thirteen feet two inches (13'2") from east property line (proposed in S18-080), required is thirteen feet six inches (13'6") for lot 1 (east lot). " Thirteen feet two inches (13'2") from west property line (proposed in S18-080), required is thirteen feet six inches (13'6") for lot 2 (west lot). |
| 09/06/2018 | ALEXANDRA HINES | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | FROM: Alexandra Hines, Lead Planner PROJECT: S18-080 (revise DP18-0050 to reflect) 1129 E 7th St The Graymont TRANSMITTAL: October 5, 2018 COMMENTS: Reciprocal Access Agreement provide and to be recorded with lot split. The following comments are relative to an application for a Design Development Option (DDO) (UDC 3.11.1). This site is located in the R-2 zone (UDC 4.7.9). Multi-family residential is a permitted use in this zone (Table 4.8-2). See Use Specific Standards 4.9.7.B.6, .9 & .10. The minimum setback is the greater of six (6) feet, or three-fourths (3/4) the height of the structure's wall facing each interior property line (Table 6.3-2.A). The proposed setback is: " Thirteen (13) feet from east property line (proposed in S18-080), required is thirteen feet six inches (13.5) for Lot 1 (east lot) based on eighteen feet height. " Thirteen (13) feet from west property line (proposed in S18-080), required is thirteen feet six inches (13.5) for Lot 2 (west lot) based on eighteen feet height. |
| 09/07/2018 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 09/07/2018 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 09/07/2018 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Provide a separate water meter for each lot. 2. Clarify how the individual units will be classified: condominiums or townhouses? If the units are townhouses, the water distribution and the building drains will have to be modified to independently serve each townhouse. |
| 11/26/2018 | KROBLES1 | ZONING-RECORDATION | REVIEW | Needs Review |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11/26/2018 | KROBLES1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |