Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

The login landing page when selecting 'View' is still occurring and is still pending further investigation. 

Plan Review Detail

Plan Number: S18-073
Parcel: Unknown

Address:
45 N MELWOOD AV

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: MINOR SUBDIVISION REVIEW

Plan Number - S18-073
Review Name: MINOR SUBDIVISION REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
08/29/2018 QJONES1 START PLANS SUBMITTED Completed
08/29/2018 ANDREW CONNOR LANDSCAPE REVIEW Approved
08/29/2018 KELLY LEE PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER Approved From: Sewer <Sewer@pima.gov>
Date: Wed, Aug 15, 2018, 1:57 PM
Subject: RE: joint sewer submittal for Melwood Place in COT
To: Mac Hudson <mac.hudson@gmail.com>
Cc: Sewer <Sewer@pima.gov>, Gerry Koziol <Gerry.Koziol@pima.gov>






Mac Hudson,



The Pima County site group does not review 4” HCS connections to the existing 6” public sewer.



THe 4” HCS connection to the 6” public sewer for the two (not yet addressed properties) will be reviewed later (after City of Tucson Building permit approval) for Sewer Connection Fees.



The City of Tucson, along with possibly other things, will need a recorded “Joint Sewer Use and Maintenance Agreement” for the two lots sharing the private/common sewer.



Hope this helps,



Gerry



From: Mac Hudson [mailto:mac.hudson@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2018 3:58 PM
To: Sewer <Sewer@pima.gov>
Subject: joint sewer submittal for Melwood Place in COT


*******
This message and sender come from outside Pima County. If you did not expect this message, proceed with caution. Verify the sender's identity before performing any action, such as clicking on a link or opening an attachment.
*******





Hello,





I spoke with Jerry (Gerald) at the front desk about a joint sewer connection for Melwood Place in the City of Tucson. He said that Pima County didn't care as long as the City approves it.





I am checking back with that to find out whether you would like to review the plans or not. Please see attached. Also the link to the plans is https://www.tucsonaz.gov/pro/pdsd/activity_search/?csrfmiddlewaretoken=T49EZTt1OrNo5Ve4ENJq34eERsYmpRVH&activity_number=s18-073&__ncforminfo=P6WrQ6j6LC9nXdRKWrUXbtJNkzA_HTA0WV-ipXUnjArWIKiaNxLi4kHuQ7uK8NHp5yT8ThvyeyMybNm00EeGsDGF1-SeOxoh





I would appreciate an email reply letting me know. Thank you.







--


best,

Mac Hudson
08/29/2018 KLEE1 TUCSON WATER NEW AREA DEVELOPMENT REVIEW Passed Proposal is less than 6 lots. Tucson Water review is not required.
08/29/2018 JIM EGAN COT NON-DSD FIRE Reqs Change Lot 1 does not have approved fire dept access and is not indicated as being sprinklered.
08/29/2018 KELLY LEE UTILITIES SOUTHWEST GAS Passed Agency notified for information only.
08/29/2018 ED ABRIGO PIMA COUNTY ASSESSOR Reqs Change FROM: Suzanne Gilpin
GIS Cartographer
Pima County Assessor's Office
(520)724-4387


DATE: August 15, 2018


RE: Assessor's Review and Comments Regarding Final Plat-
S18-073/MELWOOD PLACE-1ST SUBMITTAL


* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Plat meets Assessor's Office requirements.
__X___ Plat does not meet Assessor's Office requirements.

COMMENTS:

" Title block in the lower right hand corner must have all sections, township and range. Currently plat mentions Section 11,T14S,R13E, however the plat is also lying within a portion of Section 14,T14S,R13E.

" There must be a section tie, with a bearing and dimension from the section corner or quarter corner to the point of tie on the subdivision. (NOTE: There is no footage from the Southwest corner of Lot 2 to the Section line for a tie to the subdivision.)

" All Adjacent subdivisions should be named, with map and plat in the appropriate areas around the subdivision.

" Check ownership to make sure it matches what we have. The first name listed as owner does not match our records. The signature line should read: Murray Macfarland Hudson, and NOT Hudson Macfarland.

NOTE: THE ASSESSOR'S CURRENT INVOLVEMENT IN PROCESSING ITS MANUAL MAPS TO DIGITAL FORMAT IS EXPEDITED GREATLY BY EXCHANGE OF DIGITAL DATA. IN THE COURSE OF RECORDING THIS SUBDIVISION YOUR ASSISTANCE IN PROVIDING THIS OFFICE WITH AN AUTOCAD COPY WOULD BE GREATLY APPRECIATED. THANK YOU FOR ANY DIGITAL DATA PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED.
08/29/2018 ZELIN CANCHOLA COT NON-DSD TRAFFIC Approved
08/29/2018 TOM MARTINEZ OTHER AGENCIES AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION Approved Regional Traffic Engineering has no comments on this submittal and supports its acceptance. The proposed development will have no impact to any nearby ADOT facilities because of minimal traffic being generated from the proposed subdivision. Thank you
08/29/2018 KELLY LEE OTHER AGENCIES PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS Passed Agency notified for information only.
08/29/2018 KELLY LEE OTHER AGENCIES U. S. POST OFFICE Passed Agency notified for information only.
08/31/2018 EHAMBLI1 ZONING REVIEW Reqs Change CDRC TRANSMITTAL

TO: Development Services Department
Plans Coordination Office

FROM: Elisa Hamblin, AICP
Lead Planner
PDSD Zoning Review Section

PROJECT: Melwood Place, 45, 53, 55 N Melwood
Minor Subdivision (1st Review)
S18-078

TRANSMITTAL DATE: August 31, 2018

DUE DATE: September 7, 2018

COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed.

This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-07. Also compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM).

1. 2-07.5.1.A.3 - Revise the location map on the minor subdivision sheet to include subdivisions, arterials and collector streets, major watercourses, and railroads within the one-mile area.

2. 2-07.5.1.D - Place the words "SEQ#________" in both the upper and lower right corners outside the margin line. The blanks will be completed by the Pima County Recorder's Office at the time of recordation.

3. 2-07.5.3.A - Correct the typo ("this plat") in the Certification of Survey standard paragraph.

4. 2-07.5.3.D - Correct the missing signature line in the Approval standard paragraph. There should be a location for the Clerk, City of Tucson and Date to be signed.

5. 2-07.5.3.D - Correct the typos ("Pima" and "that the") in the Approvals standard paragraph.

6. 2-07.5.3.E - Correct the last signature line in the Assurances standard paragraph to read "City of Tucson PDSD Engineering Administrator".

7. 2-07.5.4.A - Each street, alley and easement needs to be labeled as public or private and include appropriate dedication notation.

8. 2-07.5.4.E. Show the required setback for the accessory structure located in southwest corner of lot 4. The south setback on lot 4 and the north setback on lot 5 do not meet standards in the R-2 zone. The required setback is 6' or 2/3 the height of the structure, whichever is greater. The proposed setback for both lots is 3'-0". A Design Development Option (DDO) approval must be in place prior to completion of the Minor Subdivision. A copy of this transmittal can be submitted with the DDO application materials. Please contact me if you have questions regarding the DDO process.

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Elisa.Hamblin@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4966.

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised Minor Subdivision.
08/31/2018 EHAMBLI1 HC SITE REVIEW Passed
09/04/2018 KAY MARKS PIMA COUNTY ADDRESSING Reqs Change Good Morning,

S18-073 / 45, 53 and 55 N Melwood /1st Submittal is being Returned for Corrections by Pima County Addressing. The comments are as follows:

Please note the Directional Prefix for all street names on all sheets per Pima County Zoning Code 18.83.040.D.2.a

Provide Boundary Survey corner ties per Pima County Submittal Checklist for Final Plat.Provide distance to tie property corner to section corner



Reference recorded subdivision plats of adjoining platted land by record name, date, and book and page numbers per Pima County Zoning Code 18.69.050.B.2.h

Menlo Park, Menlo Park Annex & South Menlo Park Book 03 of Maps & Plats Page 131



Thank you,



Robin Freiman

Addressing Official

Pima County Development Services Department

201 N Stone AV – 1st Floor
Tucson, AZ 85701

(520) 724-7570
09/06/2018 LIZA CASTILLO UTILITIES TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER Reqs Change Tucson Electric Power Co., (TEP) has reviewed the final plat submitted on August 14, 2018, and is unable to approve at this time. Please address the following items:

1. There are labels for Exhibit “A” and Exhibit “B”, however these exhibits are not shown elsewhere on the final plat.

2. Label the Public Utility Easement area over Lots 1 and 2.

3. Include the word “Public” in all utility easements that are being granted by the plat.

4. In the second paragraph under Certification of Title (which is typically titled “Dedication”), there is a typographical error with the word “shown”



If there are any questions, please contact me at 520-917-8744.



Thank you,



Mary Burke

Right of Way Agent III

Tucson Electric Power Co.

Land Resources – RC 131

3950 E. Irvington Road

Tucson, AZ 85714-2114

Office - 520-917-8744

Cell - 520-401-9895

mburke@tep.com
09/07/2018 LOREN MAKUS ENGINEERING REVIEW Reqs Change 1. Revise the signature line for the PDSD Engineering Administrator to City of Tucson City Engineer. PDSD doesn't have a PDSD Engineering Administrator and the City Engineer is signing plats.
2. Provide an acknowledgement statement for all owners or expand the one to cover all. One acknowledgement statement will work if all owners sign the plat at the same time.
3. Clearly tie the project to the section line shown on the plat.
09/07/2018 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Reqs Change 1. Provide independent building sewers for the two new residences. Reference: Section 701.3, IPC 2012.
2. Show that the trench location for the proposed building sewers and water service complies with Section 307.5, IPC 2012 with respect to the bearing plane of the three existing buildings.
3. For the purposes of having a water meter, a parcel is required to have a minimum width of 15-feet of frontage on a water main. An easement is not considered to be frontage. Reference: Tucson Water Remote Meter Policy, Number IV-B.08, dated 07/14/2009.
09/11/2018 KELLY LEE ZONING-DECISION LETTER REVIEW Reqs Change This review has been completed and resubmittal is required. Please resubmit the following items:
1) Two rolled sets of the plans
2) All approved documents submitted previously
3) A disk containing all items submitted
4) All items requested by review staff
5) All items needed to approve these plans

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
10/12/2018 SVALENZ1 OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed