Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Plan Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: MINOR SUBDIVISION REVIEW
Plan Number - S17-007
Review Name: MINOR SUBDIVISION REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 02/13/2017 | AHINES2 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 02/13/2017 | AHINES2 | UTILITIES | SOUTHWEST GAS | Passed | Agency notified for informational purposes only. |
| 02/13/2017 | AHINES2 | OTHER AGENCIES | U. S. POST OFFICE | Passed | Agency notified for informational purposes only. |
| 02/13/2017 | AHINES2 | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Passed | Agency notified for informational purposes only. |
| 02/16/2017 | ED ABRIGO | PIMA COUNTY | ASSESSOR | Reqs Change | Office of the Pima County Assessor 115 N. Church Ave. Tucson, Arizona 85701 BILL STAPLES ASSESSOR TO: CDRC Office Subdivision Review City of Tucson (FAX# 791-5559) FROM: Ada Griffin GIS Cartographer Pima County Assessor's Office DATE: February 16, 2017 RE: Assessor's Review and Comments Regarding: DP17-007 FINAL BLOCK PLAT FOR SAGUARO TRAILS _ * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Plat meets Assessor's Office requirements. ___X___ Plat does not meet Assessor's Office requirements. COMMENTS: " THERE MUST BE A SECTION TIE, WITH A BEARING AND DIMENSION FROM THE SECTION CORNER OR QUARTER CORNER TO THE POINT OF TIE ON THE SUBDIVISION. " THE PERIMETER LINE MUST BE SOLID AND HEAVIEST LINE WEIGHT ON THE PLAT. THE LOT LINES AND COMMON AREA LINES MUST BE SOLID AND THE NEXT HEAVIEST. LINES FOR EROSION SETBACKS, FLOODPLAIN LINES ETC. SHOULD BE THE LIGHTEST LINE WEIGHT AND BE DASHED OR DOT-DASHED. " THERE MUST BE BEARINGS AND DIMENSIONS FOR THE PERIMETER AND ALL LOT LINES AND ALL COMMON AREAS. (MISSING THE WEST & SOUTH LINES OF PERIMETER, SOUTH LINE OF BLOCK 8) " OWNERSHIP DOES NOT MATCH OUR RECORDS ON 3 OF THE 4 PARCELS. Parcel # 141-01-007G SHOWS CITY OF TUCSON, AS THE OWNER Parcel # 141-01-007K SHOWS CITY OF TUCSON, AS THE OWNER Parcel # 141-01-006D SHOWS CITY OF TUCSON, AS THE OWNER NOTE: THE ASSESSOR'S CURRENT INVOLVEMENT IN PROCESSING ITS MANUAL MAPS TO DIGITAL FORMAT IS EXPEDITED GREATLY BY EXCHANGE OF DIGITAL DATA. IN THE COURSE OF RECORDING THIS SUBDIVISION YOUR ASSISTANCE IN PROVIDING THIS OFFICE WITH AN AUTOCAD COPY WOULD BE GREATLY APPRECIATED. THANK YOU FOR ANY DIGITAL DATA PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED. |
| 02/21/2017 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: David Rivera for Steve Shields - Principal Planner PDSD Zoning Review Section PROJECT: Saguaro Trails - Block Final Plat (1st Review) S17-007 TRANSMITTAL DATE: February 21, 2017 DUE DATE: March 13, 2017 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-07. Also compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). 2-07.5.0 CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 5.1 General 2-07.5.1.A.3 - Subdivisions, arterial and collector streets, major watercourses, and railroads within the one-mile area; and, 1. COMMENT: Draw and label Mesquite Ranch Wash and Harrison Hills Wash. 2-07.5.1.H The S(Year)-___ subdivision case number assigned to the approved tentative plat must be placed in the lower right corner of the plat next to the title block. If the property is subject to a rezoning case, the C9-__-__ rezoning case number is to be noted also. 2. COMMENT: List the Subdivision case number S17-007 and the rezoning case number C9-16-09 in the lower right corner of final Plat sheets. 2-07.5.2.C Provide the following notes: "Total miles of new public streets are ____. "Total miles of new private streets are ____." 3. COMMENT: Per keynote 13 on sheets right of way is proposed and is to be dedicated by this plat. It is acknowledged that an actual street may not be developed but it is considered right of way for a future street whether private or public. List the miles of the proposed Drexel right of way as a note and note it as public. 2-07.5.2.D If the property is subject to conditions of rezoning, add the following note: "This plat is subject to the conditions of rezoning case number C9-__-__, unless superseded by a subsequent rezoning ordinance." 4. COMMENT: Add a general note stating that this plat is subject to compliance with rezoning case C9-16-09 and Regulations in the PAD document. (as of this review a PAD number could not be verified, Contact John Beall for the assigned PAD number) 2-07.5.2.I If the subdivision was the result of a rezoning case and did not require submittal and review of a tentative plat, add the following note: "Any relocation, modification, etc., of existing utilities and/or public improvements necessitated by the proposed development will be at no expense to the public." 5. COMMENT: Add the statement as noted by the standard above. 2-07.5.4.A. Indicate the name and width of each street, alley, easement (type), and drainage way within the subdivision boundary being created by this plat. Label each as public or private, along with the appropriate dedication notation; 6. COMMENT: Label Drexel Road on the applicable Plat sheets. 2-07.5.4.D. Provide location, dimensions, areas in square footage, and purposes of lots proposed for dedication (such as open spaces, recreation areas, and natural areas) or for reservation for a public use (such as public parks, water facilities, and school sites); 7. COMMENT: For clarification purposes, are there any plans to dedicate or reserve and of the riparian areas? 2-07.5.6 - Protective Covenants Protective covenants or Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) establishing responsibility for construction, maintenance, and ownership of any proposed common area, open space, private street, or similar joint use, when needed, will: 2-07.5.6.A. - Provide for maintenance of and liability for any proposed commonly-owned areas; and 8. COMMENT: Will there be CC&R's recorded as part of this Block Plat, if so include a copy with the next submittal. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised final plat and if applicable a copy of the CC&R's. |
| 02/21/2017 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING HC | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 02/28/2017 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | Tucson Electric Power Co., (TEP) has reviewed and approves the Block Plat for Saguaro Trails submitted on February 13, 2017. If you have any questions, please contact me at 520-917-8744. Thank you, Mary Burke Right of Way Agent III Tucson Electric Power Co. Mail Stop HQE613 PO Box 711, Tucson, AZ 85702 Office - 520-917-8744 Cell - 520-401-9895 mburke@tep.com |
| 02/28/2017 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Reqs Change | DP17-007 Block Plat for Saguaro Trails / 1st Submittal is being Returned for Corrections by Pima County Addressing. Please see the sticky note comments in the attached 1_Saguaro Trails Block Plat_Addressing.pdf. A comment summary has also been included for your use. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thank you, Robin Freiman Addressing Official Pima County Development Services Department 201 N Stone AV – 1st Floor Tucson, AZ 85701 (520) 724-7570 |
| 03/01/2017 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-RESIDENTIAL | REVIEW | Completed | |
| 03/08/2017 | ZELIN CANCHOLA | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | |
| 03/10/2017 | KLEE1 | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Needs Review | Requires submittal to Pima County Wastewater |
| 03/10/2017 | JIM EGAN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | |
| 03/10/2017 | JANE DUARTE | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved | Tucson Parks and Recreation has no concerns or comments regarding this block plat. |
| 03/13/2017 | JOE LINVILLE | NPPO | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 03/13/2017 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 03/15/2017 | PAUL BAUGHMAN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | DATE: March 16, 2017 DUE DATE: March 13, 2017 SUBJECT: Final Block Plat TO: Ryan Stucki, PE LOCATION: Saguaro Trails REVIEWERS: Paul Baughman, PE, CFM ACTIVITY: S17-007 SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Planning and Development Services Department has received and reviewed the proposed Development Plan Package. In general, the drainage design details for the proposed Drexel Road extension needs to be greatly enhanced and the detention/retention for the residential lot area needs to be deferred until additional information (ie. RACs) is available during the individual tentative plats for each of the block. The following items need to be addressed: 1) Per UDC 7.14.4, Section 2.3.1.2C please provide a summary of the PAD drainage requirements as part of the Drainage report. See page 68 and other sections of the PAD. Please show how these requirements have been satisfied. 2) Per Section III.A.4 Subdivision Block Platting & Public Right-of-way Dedications section of the PAD (Page 68) The Block Plat will also dedicate the westerly extension of the Drexel Road Right of way. This same section indicates a roundabout is anticipated at this terminus, from which access will be provided to the SHARP facility and to planning area E. Please provide right-of-way dedication for Drexel Road such that it includes the roundabout. Update sheet 5 of the plat accordingly. 3) Per Section III.A.4 Subdivision Block Platting & Public Right-of-way Dedications section of the PAD (Page 68) a detailed master drainage study will be submitted and will include calculations supporting the size and configuration of new culverts beneath Drexel Road, their inlet and outlet protection, sidewalk scuppers, ect. Please provide these calculations and reference them to an exhibit for purposes of clarity. Please also include summary tables within the narrative of the drainage report. See UDC 7.14.4, Section 2.3.1.3B(2 and 3). The exhibit should show roadway plan and profile information for the roadway and the drainage structures with identifiers at locations to be shown on this exhibit that allow the engineering reviewer to reference each proposed drainage crossing location to a summary table and calculations in an appendix which will be reviewed during the 2nd submittal. 4) Per Section III.A.4 Subdivision Block Platting & Public Right-of-way Dedications section of the PAD (Page 68) the master drainage report will not include an analysis of retention/detention provisions for the future residential lotting. Please remove detention calculations from the drainage master drainage report for areas that are to be part of the future residential lot areas. Please update page 1 (section 1B) of the drainage report to indicate that it is not the purpose of this report to establish retention/detention requirements for the residential blocks. Alternatively, this information may be included as for reference only. It should be clearly stated that technical review for code compliance will occur at the tentative plat stage for each block when the densities are known such that it may be determined whether 2 or 5 year threshold retention requirements will be met. It will not be clear which retention requirement will apply until the residential tentative plats shows whether the density is between 3 and 6 RAC or greater than 6 RAC. The density ranges provided on page 74 of the PAD could fall into either regulatory category. Section III.D.3 (page 100) of the PAD indicates that the site is subject to normal Pima County/City of Tucson Detention/Retention requirements. 5) Per Section III.A.4 Subdivision Block Platting & Public Right-of-way Dedications section of the PAD (Page 68) the detailed master drainage report must provide detailed hydrologic calculations for the existing conditions and post-developed conditions resulting from the construction of the PAD and its attendant infrastructure. Please provide detention and retention calculations including required 5 year threshold retention volumes for mitigation of the roadway impacts. Please update section 1B on page 1 of the drainage report to indicate that it is the intention of this report to establish threshold retention requirements for the mitigation of the future roadway construction of Drexel Road. 6) Per Section III.A.4 Subdivision Block Platting & Public Right-of-way Dedications section of the PAD (Page 68) a Native Plant Preservation Plan (NPPP) and a comprehensive Environmental Resource Report (ERR) will be submitted for review and approval concurrent with the block plat. 7) Per Page 77 of the PAD (Section III.B.2.M) All run-off from pavement and from non-residential buildings and landscape will be directed into water-harvesting areas or into retention/detention basins that incorporate water harvesting. Please include this in the drainage requirements section of the drainage report per UDC 7.14.4, Section 2.3.1.2C. 8) Section III (page 3) of the drainage report discusses detention basin sizing. Per Section III.A.4 Subdivision Block Platting & Public Right-of-way Dedications section of the PAD (Page 68) this is not part of the block plat master drainage report and should be removed. This is to be addressed as part of the detention/retention drainage report analysis for each block based on specific residential densities. 9) Section III (page 3) of the drainage report indicates that general Drexel Culvert Crossings are discussed. This discussion needs to be expanded to include the calculations supporting the size and configuration of the culverts beneath Drexel Road, their inlet and outlet protection, sidewalk scuppers, ect and will set the basic design parameters for the entire Drexel Road extension. Per Tucson Code Section 26-8c provide a profile and elevation of Drexel road where report narative is proposing to allow one foot of flooding over the road during a 100 year storm. Demonstrate that a conventional motor vehicle can traverse this flood crossing during the 100 year storm. Per UDC 7.14.4, Section 2.3.1.5D please provide easily understandable hydraulic calculation sheets for the proposed culverts under Drexel Road. 10) Section IV (page 3) of the drainage report indicates that additional details of erosion protection will be addressed in future submittals. A Riprap gradation table is shown in Table 4. Per Section III.A.4 Subdivision Block Platting & Public Right-of-way Dedications section of the PAD (Page 68) inlet and outlet protection calculations for culverts under Drexel Road and sidewalk scuppers discharging stormwater off of Drexel Road will need to be provided in the next submittal of this drainage report prior to approval of this block plat. 11) Since some of the 100-year flow is proposed to be backed up on the upstream side of Drexel Road (ie. Only the 50 year storm is proposed to pass under the road) please provide drainage easements in accordance with UDC 7.14.4, Section 2.3.1.5G as part of the plat for areas of inundation during the 100-year storm. 12) Per Section III.A.4 Subdivision Block Platting & Public Right-of-way Dedications section of the PAD (Page 68) detailed hydrologic calculations for retention/detention basins that provide mitigation for Drexel Road are required to comply with UDC 7.14.4, section 2.3.1.6a4. Please show compliance with this section as part of this report. 13) Per Tucson Code Section 26-8E please provide calculations for the erosion hazard setbacks per UDC 7.14.4, Section 7.6.1. Sheet 10 of the plan seems to be showing a uniform 20' EHs from the FP limits. The 724 cfs flow called out for Concentration point 7 on figure 5 of the drainage report would seem to indicate that this setback is not reflective of the equations from section 7.6.1 of the Drainage Standards Manual. Please update accordingly. 14) Per UDC 7.14.4, section 8.4 the maximum rise in the 100 year floodplain elevation shall not exceed one-tenth of a foot. Please update the last paragraph in section III of the drainage report on page 4 to reflect this requirement instead of the current reference to minimal backwater effects. It is noted that minimal to no discharge over tops the road based on the Culvert Analysis reports for the 8' x 4' box (0.24 cfs) culverts, 3-6' x 4' box (0.0 cfs) and the 3 - 48" pipe (3.52 cfs) culverts as shown in appendix B. 15) Per AM 2-06.4.7B1 please add the appropriate hold harmless note to the block plat general notes. If you have any comments, questions or wish to discuss new information, please call or email me at 520-837-5007 or paul.baughman@tucsonaz.gov. |
| 03/16/2017 | KLEE1 | TUCSON WATER NEW AREA DEVELOPMENT | REVIEW | Approved | March 15, 2017 Tucson Expediting & Development 2030 E. Speedway Blvd #110 Tucson, AZ 85719 Attn: Lisa Bowers SUBJECT: Water Availability for project: 5700 S. Houghton Rd., APN: 14101006C, 14101006D, 14101007G, 14101007K, Case #: WA2151, T-15, R-15, SEC-02, Lots: 9999, Location Code: TUC, Total Area: 319.029ac, Zoning: PAD-30 WATER SUPPLY Tucson Water will provide water service to this project based on the subject zoning of the above parcels. Tucson Water has an assured water supply (AWS) designation from the State of Arizona Department of Water Resources (ADWR). An AWS designation means Tucson Water has met the criteria established by ADWR for demonstration of a 100-year water supply - it does not mean that water service is currently available to the subject project. WATER SERVICE The approval of water meter applications is subject to the current availability of water service at the time an application is received. The developer shall be required to submit a water master plan identifying, but not limited to: 1) Water Use; 2) Fire Flow Requirements; 3) Offsite/Onsite Water Facilities; 4) Loops and Proposed Connection Points to Existing Water System; and 5) Easements/Common Areas. Any specific area plan fees, protected main/facility fees and/or other needed facilities' cost, are to be paid by the developer. If the existing water system is not capable of meeting the requirements of the proposed development, the developer shall be financially responsible for modifying or enhancing the existing water system to meet those needs. This letter shall be null and void two years from the date of issuance. Issuance of this letter is not to be construed as agency approval of a water plan or as containing construction review comments relative to conflicts with existing water lines and the proposed development. If you have any questions, please call New Development at 791-4718. Sincerely, Richard A. Sarti, P.E. Engineering Manager Tucson Water Department RS:ka CC:File |
| 03/17/2017 | KLEE1 | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | This review has been completed and resubmittal is required. Please resubmit the following items: 1) Two rolled sets of the plans 2) All approved documents submitted previously 3) A disk containing all items submitted 4) All items requested by review staff 5) All items needed to approve these plans |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 03/17/2017 | LBOJORQ1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |