Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Plan Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - FINAL PLAT REVIEW
Plan Number - S16-085
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - FINAL PLAT REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 06/02/2017 | KROBLES1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 06/13/2017 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: David Rivera for Steve Shields - Principal Planner PDSD Zoning Review Section PROJECT: Irvington & I-19 Commercial Center Final Plat (2nd Review) S16-085 TRANSMITTAL DATE: June 13, 2017 DUE DATE: June 30, 2017 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-07. Also compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). SECTION 2-07.0.0: FINAL PLAT, BLOCK PLAT, MINOR SUBDIVISION, AND CONDOMINIUM PLAT APPLICATIONS 2-07.5.0 CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 1. Follow up to Previous Comment 1: The subdivision names or map and plat numbers were not labeled within the location map as requested by the previous comment. Previous Comment 1: 2-07.5.1.A.3 Label all subdivisions within the location map. 2. Follow up to Previous Comment 2: Label the common easements as noted by the redlines on sheets 2, 3, 6 and 7. Previous Comment 2: 2-07.5.1.E.1 Define what the common areas are within the title block such as, private streets, retention detention, etc. 3. Follow up to Previous Comment 5: This comment will remain until the change has been made to the title sheet of the CC&R's as requested per the previous comment. (It is acknowledged that the changes will be made by Final Plat acceptance.) Previous Comment 5: 2-07.5.6 The CC&R title block should match the title block on the final plat. 4. COMMENT: The final Plat is conditionally approved pending approval of the revised tentative plat. If you have any questions about this transmittal, Contact David Rivera on Tuesday or Wednesday at (520) 837-4957 or by email David.Rivera@tucsonaz.gov or contact Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised final plat. |
| 06/19/2017 | ALEXANDRA HINES | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Reqs Change | June 16, 2017 To: Jeffrey Hunt Cypress Civil Development c/o Lisa Bowers Tucson Expediting & Development Thru: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager City of Tucson Development Services Department From: _______________________________________________ Debbie Ketchem, Civil Engineer Assistant - Sr. Development Liaison Unit Subject: Review Letter - sewer elements only Final Plat - 2nd Submittal, P16WS00094 (S16-085) Irvington & I-19 Commercial Center, Lots 1 - 47 and Common Areas "A", "B" and "C" ____________________________________________________________________________ Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department (PCRWRD) received this Final Plat on June 12, 2017. The following revisions are requested: 1. All sheets: On the first review letter (comment #1) RWRD requested the Title Block to be corrected. It was partially corrected. This project is located at Calle Santa Cruz north of Irvington Road and is a replat of Parque De Santa Cruz Block 1, recorded Book 29 - Page 48 and unsubdivided parcels. Correct appropriately. 2. The Development Plan Application states the project includes one (1) assessor parcel however, it appears there are three (3) assessor parcels that are part of this project. Clearly identify the boundaries of this project. The engineer response letter stated this had been complied with; however, the boundaries of the project appear to remain the same. 3. All sheets: On the first review letter (comment #3) RWRD requested to define the use for Common Areas "A", "B" and "C" in the Dedication and Title Block. Areas have been defined; however, they are now identified as "Common Easements". Correct appropriately, as "Common Area" with their defined use in the Dedication, Title Block and all other areas labeled as "CE". 4. Sheet 1: Provide documentation regarding Trust 201714R, 201715R, 201716R, 201717R and 201718R. P16WS00094 (S16-085) Final Plat - 2nd review June 16, 2017 5. Sheets 6 & 7: It shows the "West Edge of public sewer easement per this plat" (new 33' public sewer). The full width of the easement should be labeled and shown. The concern is this easement is outside of the boundary of this project; therefore, it can't be recorded as "part of the plat". It will need to be done by separate instrument. If it is within the boundary of the project, revise the boundaries to be shown accurately. The engineer response letter stated this is no longer applicable because it is a private sewer (comment #10), however it clearly states on the second submittal "new 33' public sewer easement per this plat" (sheet 7). Correct appropriately. Either the boundaries of the project are wrong or the sewer easement shall be recorded by separate instrument. 6. Sheets 6 & 7: RWRD "recommends" the existing 25' easement be abandoned as appropriate if it is no longer needed. With the two "public sewer easements" within the same footprint there could be confusion of which easement is correct. Or you could add a new separate easement adjacent to the existing public sewer easement to gain your total width of 33'. Again, this is a recommendation for clarity purposes only. I am proposing this comment again since there still is confusion about this easement because of comment #5 that still needs to be resolved. 7. Sheet 1: To eliminate confusion, revise paragraph two in the Dedication so it identifies the utility easements and "public sewer easements" as being conveyed to the public. In addition, create a separate paragraph in the Dedication to identify the responsibility for the private sewer. 8. Sheets 2, 3 & 4: An easement has been recorded since the first review, sequence # 2017181213 and on some pages it is identified as "existing" and on other pages as "new". We recommend to identify all locations as "existing". The next submittal will be the 3rd submittal for this Final Plat. The RWRD review fee for the 3rd submittal will be $273.00 (Per PC Code, Title 13.20.030.A.2). Do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions at (520) 724-6481. Cc: Lorenzo Hernandez, P.E., C.E. Manager., RWRD Francisco Galindo, P.E., RWRD |
| 06/19/2017 | ALEXANDRA HINES | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Reqs Change | July 13, 2017 To: Jeffrey Hunt Matt Stuart Cypress Civil Development c/o Lisa Bowers Tucson Expediting & Development Thru: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager City of Tucson Development Services Department From: _______________________________________________ Debbie Ketchem, Civil Engineer Assistant - Sr. Development Liaison Unit Subject: Review Letter - sewer elements only Final Plat - 3rd Submittal, P16WS00094 (S16-085) Irvington & I-19 Commercial Center, Lots 1 - 47 and Blocks "A" - "E"" ___________________________________________________________________________ Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department (PCRWRD) received this Final Plat on July 11, 2017. As discussed with Matt Stuart, Francisco Galindo and Debbie Ketchem the following items shall be addressed and/or submitted before the Final Plat can be approved. 1. Sheet 1: Documentation shall be provided regarding the ownership for Trusts 201714R, 201715R, 201716R, 201717R and 201718R (recorded). 2. Sheets 6 & 7: The new public sewer easement west of this project shall be recorded by separate easement. Provide the sequence number for this easement. 3. Sheets 6 & 7: The sewer easement, Dkt. 7810, Pg. 1180 to be abandoned by separate easement. Provide the sequence number for the abandonment of easement. 4. Sheet 1: Revise the Dedication so it identifies the utility easements and "public sewer easements" as being conveyed to the public. In addition, the Dedication shall clearly identify the responsibility for the lot owners including private sewers and the HCS (BCS) connections. The next submittal will be the 4th submittal for this Final Plat. The RWRD review fee for the 4th submittal will be $0.00 (Per PC Code, Title 13.20.030.A.2). Do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions at (520) 724-6481. Cc: Lorenzo Hernandez, P.E., C.E. Manager., RWRD Francisco Galindo, P.E., RWRD |
| 06/28/2017 | KELLY LEE | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Reqs Change | Tucson Electric Power Co., (TEP) has reviewed the final plat submitted on June 5, 2017 and is unable to approve the plat. As noted in TEP’s response to the first submittal, TEP will require a 16.00’ wide easement for the existing 46kV and 13.8kV overhead line on the west side of the development to be granted by the final plat. The easement will be 16.00’ wide from centerline of the existing structures. Although encroachments are not consistent with the use of TEP’s easement right of way, certain uses may be conditionally approved. TEP requires that, at a minimum, adequate access to our facilities are provided, landscape be planned using the TEP “Tree Planting Guide” for landscaping and trees that do not grow over 15 feet at maturity, and clearances must meet the National Electrical Safety code (NESC). TEP maintains the right to trim or remove vegetation that impedes the operation or safety of our facilities. Additionally, no habitable buildings such as commercial office buildings, residences, apartments, or other dwelling places, whether site built or modular, permanent or temporary, will be allowed in the easement area. Based on the latest development plan submitted to TEP on 6/1/17, there is a building corner that will encroach within the 16.00 wide easement for the existing OH line and existing conductor at minimum three (3) feet located at TEP structure No. 16. This building location needs to be adjusted to be outside of both the proposed easement and underneath the conductor and must meet the NESC horizontal clearance requirement. If you have any questions, please contact me at 520-917-8744. Thank you, Mary Burke Right of Way Agent III Tucson Electric Power Co. Mail Stop HQE613 PO Box 711, Tucson, AZ 85702 Office - 520-917-8744 Cell - 520-401-9895 mburke@tep.com |
| 06/28/2017 | KELLY LEE | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Reqs Change | See Redlined Copy of Plat under Document in PRO. S16-085 Irvington & 1-19 / 2nd Submittal is being Returned for Corrections by Pima County Addressing. The attached pdf contains Addressing’s comments. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thank you, Robin Freiman Addressing Official Pima County Development Services Department 201 N Stone AV – 1st Floor Tucson, AZ 85701 (520) 724-7570 Description: Description: cid:image001.png@01CE70DF.60625CC0 Click here to search for Projects and Permits or to make a Payment Click here to search for Septic Records |
| 06/30/2017 | KELLY LEE | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | |
| 06/30/2017 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Dedication of the "common easements" or easements in the common areas must be reflected in the dedication statements. 2. Provide recordation of all existing easements. 3. Clearly identify the squares shown on the plan on various lots. Either label the squares or include them in the legend. 4. Clarify whether the star symbol is used for driveway location or for addressing location. 5. Make sure the plat dedications, CC&Rs and assurances documents are consistent with whatever naming convention is used. |
| 06/30/2017 | KELLY LEE | PIMA COUNTY | ASSESSOR | Reqs Change | Office of the Pima County Assessor 240 N STONE AVENUE Tucson, Arizona 85701 BILL STAPLES ASSESSOR TO: CDRC Office Subdivision Review City of Tucson (FAX# 791-5559) FROM: Julieann Arechederra GIS Cartographer Pima County Assessor's Office DATE: June 29, 2017 RE: Assessor's Review and Comments Regarding: IRVINGTON & I-19 COMMERCIAL CENTER S16-085 (2nd FINAL PLAT) * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Plat meets Assessor's Office requirements. ___X___ Plat does not meet Assessor's Office requirements. COMMENTS: " OWNERSHIP NOT DISCLOSED ON FINAL PLAT. OUR RECORDS SHOW THE CITY OF TUCSON AS OWNERSHIP. NOTE: THE ASSESSOR'S CURRENT INVOLVEMENT IN PROCESSING ITS MANUAL MAPS TO DIGITAL FORMAT IS EXPEDITED GREATLY BY EXCHANGE OF DIGITAL DATA. IN THE COURSE OF RECORDING THIS SUBDIVISION YOUR ASSISTANCE IN PROVIDING THIS OFFICE WITH AN AUTOCAD COPY WOULD BE GREATLY APPRECIATED. THANK YOU FOR ANY DIGITAL DATA PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 07/18/2017 | ARUIZ1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |