Plan Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: MINOR SUBDIVISION REVIEW
Plan Number - S13-040
Review Name: MINOR SUBDIVISION REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10/28/2013 | CPIERCE1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 10/29/2013 | JIM EGAN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | |
| 10/31/2013 | PGEHLEN1 | UTILITIES | SOUTHWEST GAS | Approved | See documents in SIRE. Documents are informational. |
| 10/31/2013 | PGEHLEN1 | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Approved | ESD has completed its review and has no objections to the approval of the Final Plat. If there are any questions, I can be reached at kperry@perryengineering.net Ken Perry, PE, LEED AP Principal 100 East Sixth Street Tucson, Arizona 85705 Cell 520.820.4355 Fax 520.629.9952 |
| 11/01/2013 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Approved | Regional Traffic Engineering has no comments on this submittal and supports its acceptance. Thank you. ________________________________ Confidentiality and Nondisclosure Notice: This email transmission and any attachments are intended for use by the person(s)/entity(ies) named above and may contain confidential/privileged information. Any unauthorized use, disclosure or distribution is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by email, and delete or destroy all copies plus attachments. . |
| 11/05/2013 | PGEHLEN1 | TUCSON WATER NEW AREA DEVELOPMENT | REVIEW | Approved | See letter in SIRE |
| 11/05/2013 | PGEHLEN1 | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Approved | PIMA COUNTY REGIONAL WASTEWATER RECLAMATION DEPARTMENT 201 NORTH STONE AVENUE TUCSON, ARIZONA 85701-1207 JACKSON JENKINS PH: (520) 724-6500 DIRECTOR FAX: (520) 620-0135 November 5, 2013 To: Dinkar Gangwal, P.E., Project Manager Alpha Engineering, Inc. Thru: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager City of Tucson Development Services Department From: Michael J. Harrington, Senior CEA Development Review Subject: Catalina Farms Flower Annex, Lots 1 & 2 Final Plat - 1st Submittal, S13-040, Review Comments The drawings of the Final Plat for the proposed project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department (PCRWRD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. PCRWRD hereby approves the above referenced submittal of the Final Plat received by us on October 28, 2013. Please note the following: Approval of the above referenced submittal does not authorize the construction of public or private sewer collection, or water distribution lines. Prior to the construction of such features, a Construction Authorization (Approval To Construct) will need to be obtained. If you have any questions regarding the above comments, please contact me. Michael J. Harrington, Sr. CEA Planning and Engineering - Development Liaison Unit Cc: Chad Amateau, P.E., RWRD Francisco Galindo, P.E., RWRD Project file, T13S, R14E, Section 33 |
| 11/05/2013 | ED ABRIGO | PIMA COUNTY | ASSESSOR | Denied | Office of the Pima County Assessor 115 N. Church Ave. Tucson, Arizona 85701 BILL STAPLES ASSESSOR TO: CDRC Office Subdivision Review City of Tucson (FAX# 791-5559) FROM: Susan King GIS Cartographer Pima County Assessor's Office DATE: November 5, 2013 RE: Assessor's Review and Comments Regarding Final Plat S13-040 Catalina Farms Flower Annex * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Plat meets Assessor's Office requirements. ___X___ Plat does not meet Assessor's Office requirements. COMMENTS: Please make the following corrections. 1. Correct the spelling of Block 4 to Book 4 in the title block; also add an "s" to the word lot, since it should be a plural. 2. In the area just north of the lots, change Block 4 to Book 4 and add M&P page 35; also add an "s" to word lot. 3. The perimeter line must be solid and the heaviest line weight; the lot line must also be a solid line and the next heaviest line weight. NOTE: THE ASSESSOR'S CURRENT INVOLVEMENT IN PROCESSING ITS MANUAL MAPS TO DIGITAL FORMAT IS EXPEDITED GREATLY BY EXCHANGE OF DIGITAL DATA. IN THE COURSE OF RECORDING THIS SUBDIVISION YOUR ASSISTANCE IN PROVIDING THIS OFFICE WITH AN AUTOCAD COPY WOULD BE GREATLY APPRECIATED. THANK YOU FOR ANY DIGITAL DATA PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED. Thank you, Susan King |
| 11/13/2013 | JOHN BEALL | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Passed | |
| 11/15/2013 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Reqs Change | SUBJECT: MINOR SUBDIVISION - CATALINA FARMS FLOWER ANNEX S13-040 Tucson Electric Power Co. (TEP) has reviewed the Final Plat for this minor subdivision received on October 29, 2013. TEP is unable to approve the plat at this time. TEP has an easement for our existing overhead facilities along the west boundary of Lot 2, recorded January 28, 1947 in Book 107 at Page 236. The easement must be shown on the plat and the title report updated to reflect the easement on this property. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at 917-8744. Thank you, Mary Burke Right of Way Agent Tucson Electric Power Co. Mail Stop HQW603 PO Box 711, Tucson, AZ 85702 Office - 520-917-8744 Cell - 520-401-9895 mburke@tep.com |
| 11/18/2013 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Denied | MICHELENE NOWAK ADDRESSING REVIEW PH #: 724-9512 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: MICHELENE NOWAK, ADDRESSING REVIEW SUBJECT: S13-040 CATALINA FARMS FLOWER ANNEX/FINAL PLAT-1ST Review DATE: NOVEMBER 18, 2013 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval: 1. Label Project# S13-040 on all Sheets 2. On Title Block on all Sheets -correct Block 4 to Book 4, M&P page 35 . . . 3. Spell out Winstel Boulevard on all Sheets |
| 11/18/2013 | MICHAEL ST. PAUL | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL FROM: Michael St Paul Planning Technician PROJECT: S13-040 3753 East Flower Street Minor Subdivision TRANSMITTAL: November 12, 2013 COMMENTS: Please attach a response letter with the next submittal, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Unified Development Code (Section 8.4.1) and the Administrative Manual (Section 2-07) were addressed. The consultants attend a pre-submittal meeting and the final plat for a minor subdivision was approved for submittal on October 25th of 2013 (UDC 8.4.1.C). "A final plat shall be approved and recorded within three years of the tentative plat approval date. A final plat is subject only to the ordinances in effect at the time of the tentative plat application except where an ordinance specifically states that it applies to pending applications" (UDC Section 8.5.2.A Final Plat Approval Period). "The S(Year)-____subdivision case number assigned to the approved tentative plat must be placed in the lower right corner of the plat next the title block" (AM 2-07.5.1.H). COMMENT: The subdivision number to be placed in the lower right corner is S13-040. "Dedication Language. Use one (1) of the following four (4) statements as may be appropriate for the plat. Section 2-07.5.3.B.2.c may be used in subdivision with private elements. Section 2-07.5.3.B.2.d may be used where electrical facilities are not specifically located on common areas" (AM 2-07.5.3.B.2). COMMENT: The dedications provided do not match the purposes and uses of the subdivision, nor are there any private streets provided in this subdivision. Revise the dedications to be appropriate to and consistent with the proposed subdivision. Also see comments by the engineering reviewer. "The following ASSURANCE block must be placed on the plat's first sheet" (AM 2-07.5.3.B.4.E). "ASSURANCES" "This is to certify that all improvements, such as streets, sidewalks, sewer, what and utility installation, drainage and flood control facilities, and monuments, required by the City of Tucson have been completed or the future completion of such improvements has bee assured by a land trust financial assurance agreement, the posting of performance bonds, an escrow account, letter of credit, or other security as the City of Tucson deems necessary and proper. In the event that any such assurance expires, lapses or in otherwise inadequate to assure the completion of assurable infrastructure, the City may suspend the issuance of building permits or certificates of occupancy." COMMENT: The assurance statement provided on the plat is incomplete. Provide the complete statement (as above) on the plat. The signature lines are for the: "City of Tucson Planning and Development Services Department Director" And the: "City of Tucson PDSD Engineering Administrator." COMMENT: Correct both signature lines. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised Final Plat for the Minor Subdivision plat and any requested documents. Provide plot plans for each of the proposed lots. A copy of the plot plan instructions is available at the zoning review counter and is included with this set of comments. It appears that an approved Design Development Option (DDO) shall be required for the proposed setbacks to the new property line. |
| 11/19/2013 | RONALD BROWN | ZONING HC | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 11/20/2013 | LAITH ALSHAMI | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | Laith Alshami, Engineering and Floodplain Review, 11/22/2013, SUBJECT: Catalina Farms Flower Annex Lot 1 & 2 S13-040, T13S, R14E, SECTIONS 33 RECEIVED: Final Plat and Drainage Report on October 28, 2013 The subject submittal has been reviewed. The submittal can not be approved at this time. Address the following comments before review can continue. Prepare a detailed response that explains the revisions that were made and references the exact location on the Final Plat where the revisions were made: Final Plat 1. Show on the site plan existing grades or contour lines (UDC 8.4.1.A). 2. Provide the complete S13-040 case number on every sheet (A.M. 2-07.5.1.H). 3. Determine if the owner(s) is an individual or more than one person and revise all "Certification" and "Dedication" accordingly. 4. The Dedication language does not appear to suit the proposed lot split (e.g. dedication of private streets but the lot split does not have new private streets, etc.). Revise the dedication to include only what actually exists and is proposed to be dedicated. Additionally, the language should include the City of Tucson instead of Pima County (A.M. 2-07.5.3.B). 5. Provide the Trust Number in the appropriate paragraph in the "Dedication" (A.M. 2-07.5.3.B). 6. Fill in the name of the City Clerk in the "Approval" Block (A.M. 2-07.5.3.D). 7. Revise the name of the department to "Planning and Development Services" under the director's signature line in the "Assurances Block. Additionally, replace the words "City of Tucson Engineer" under the signature line in the "Assurances" Block to "City of Tucson Development Services Engineering Administrator" (A.M. 2-07.5.3.E). 8. Clarify if assurances are required to assure that all relevant assurable items (i.e. monuments, etc.) that need to be installed, shall be completed with this plat (A.M. 2-07.5.3.E). 9. The Assurance statement is incomplete and does not match the standard statement. Revise in accordance with A.M. 2-07.5.3.E. 10. If assurances are required, submit a copy for review (A.M. 2-07.5.3.E). 11. Revise the "Beneficiary" block to include the Trust Number (A.M. 2-07.5.3.C). 12. Show on the plat all existing and proposed easements including their dimensions and description (A.M. 2-07.5.4.A) and (A.M. 2-07.5.5.B). 13. Show, if applicable, any proposed no-vehicular access easements (A.M. 2-07.5.4.H). 14. Provide the tie between the basis of bearing and one of the lot corners (A.M. 2-07.5.5.A). 15. According to the legal description of the parcel across Flower Street from the subject parcel (i.e. The property on the south side is short 10 feet from the plat: CATALINA FARMS ANNEX NLY98.2' W125' E150' LOT 6 EXC NLY10' BLK 1), Flower Street right of way width is 40'. Revise the plat accordingly (A.M. 2-07.5.5.A). 16. In order to expedite the plat review and approval, provide the boundary survey and closure calculations report in accordance with A.M. 2-07.5.5.C.3. 17. Submit, if applicable, a copy of the assurances for review. RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Revised Final Plat and Assurances |
| 11/20/2013 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-RESIDENTIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 11/21/2013 | ZELIN CANCHOLA | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Reqs Change | From Zelin Canchola TDOT November 21, 2013 S13-040 Minor Subdivision The dedications provided do not match the purposes and uses of the subdivision, nor are there any private streets provided in this subdivision. Revise the dedications to be appropriate to and consistent with the proposed subdivision. The dedications provided do not match the purposes and uses of the subdivision, There are no private streets provided in this subdivision. Revise the dedications to be appropriate to and consistent with the proposed subdivision. |
| 11/21/2013 | PGEHLEN1 | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Approved | No objections/ adverse comments. ____________________________ Eric W. Kramer, Ph.D., AICP Senior Land-Use Modeler PAG40MPOhoriz3.png 177 N. Church Ave, Suite 405 Tucson, AZ 85701 (520) 792-1093 x506 (tel) (520) 620-6981 (fax) www.pagnet.org <mailto:ekramer@pagnet.org> ekramer@pagnet.org |
| 11/22/2013 | PGEHLEN1 | COT NON-DSD | TUCSON POLICE DEPARTMENT | Approved | I have no issues with this proposal. CSO Becky Noel #37968 Tucson Police Dept 837-7428 |
| 11/25/2013 | PGEHLEN1 | OTHER AGENCIES | TUCSON AIRPORT AUTHORITY | Passed | |
| 11/26/2013 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 11/26/2013 | JANE DUARTE | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Passed | |
| 11/27/2013 | PGEHLEN1 | UTILITIES | EL PASO NATURAL GAS | Passed | |
| 11/27/2013 | ROBERT YOUNG | PIMA COUNTY | PIMA CTY - DEV REVIEW | Passed | |
| 11/27/2013 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | This review has been completed and resubmittal is required. Please include the following items with your resubmittal: 1) Four rolled sets of the plans 2) A disk containing all items submitted 3) All items requested by review staff 4) All items needed to approve this plan. |
| 11/27/2013 | PGEHLEN1 | OTHER AGENCIES | U. S. POST OFFICE | Passed | |
| 11/27/2013 | PGEHLEN1 | UTILITIES | CENTURYLINK | Passed |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 01/27/2014 | CPIERCE1 | REJECT SHELF | Completed |
| 01/27/2014 | SHANAE POWELL | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |