Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Plan Review Detail

Plan Number: S13-026
Parcel: Unknown

Address:
4975 E BENSON HY

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: MINOR SUBDIVISION REVIEW

Plan Number - S13-026
Review Name: MINOR SUBDIVISION REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
08/27/2013 PGEHLEN1 START PLANS SUBMITTED Completed
08/28/2013 JIM EGAN COT NON-DSD FIRE Approved Conditioned upon no additional comments from Parks and Recreation Staff.
08/28/2013 PGEHLEN1 TUCSON WATER NEW AREA DEVELOPMENT REVIEW Approved See letter in SIRE
08/30/2013 JOHN BEALL COT NON-DSD COMMUNITY PLANNING Approved Conditioned upon no additional comments from Parks and Recreation Staff.
09/03/2013 PGEHLEN1 PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER Approved PIMA COUNTY
REGIONAL WASTEWATER RECLAMATION DEPARTMENT
201 NORTH STONE AVENUE
TUCSON, ARIZONA 85701-1207
JACKSON JENKINS PH: (520) 724-6500
DIRECTOR FAX: (520) 724-6377
September 3, 2013

To: Bruce Paton, P.E., Project Manager
RICK Engineering Company

Thru: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager
City of Tucson Development Services Department

From: Michael J. Harrington, Sr. Civil Engineering Assistant
Development Liaison Unit

Subject: Valencia Crossing, Lots 1-4, Block "A" & Common Area "A"
Final Plat - 1st Submittal, S13-026, Review Comments

The drawings of the Final Plat for the proposed project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department (PCRWRD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department.
PCRWRD hereby approves the above referenced submittal of the Final Plat received by us on August 27, 2013.
Please note the following: Approval of the above referenced submittal does not authorize the construction of public or private sewer collection, or water distribution lines. Prior to the construction of such features, a Construction Authorization (Approval To Construct) will need to be obtained from PDEQ.

If you have any questions regarding the above comments, please contact me at (520) 724-6305 or Michael.Harrington@wwm.pima.gov .




Michael J. Harrington, Sr. CEA
Planning and Engineering - Development Liaison Unit



Cc: Francisco Galindo, P.E., RWRD
Chad Amateau, P.E., RWRD
Project file, T15S, R14E, Section 11
09/05/2013 TOM MARTINEZ OTHER AGENCIES AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION Approv-Cond Patricia-
Is there a timeline for the development actually being constructed? We believe that timeline will give the developer some time to provide ADOT with a traffic document noting any changes to traffic patterns and the effect of the County's roadway widening.
Regional Traffic is looking for a TIA to be submitted as the development is closer to breaking ground. The document should address any mitigation needed for the westbound on-ramp to I-10, the possibility of a connection to Drexel road on the north and the any recommendation from the I-10, I-19 to County Line, Design Concept Report. Thank you.
09/16/2013 LIZA CASTILLO UTILITIES TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER Approved SUBJECT: VALENCIA CROSSING BLOCK PLAT
S13-026

Tucson Electric Power Company (TEP) has reviewed and approves the Valencia Crossing Block Plat submitted on August 28, 2013.

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me.

Thank you,

Mary Burke
Right of Way Agent
Tucson Electric Power Co.
Mail Stop HQW603
PO Box 711, Tucson, AZ 85702
Office - 520-917-8744
Cell - 520-401-9895
mburke@tep.com
09/16/2013 KAY MARKS PIMA COUNTY ADDRESSING Denied MICHELENE NOWAK
ADDRESSING REVIEW
PH #: 724-9512

TO:

CITY PLANNING

FROM:

MICHELENE NOWAK, ADDRESSING REVIEW

SUBJECT:

S13-026/VALENCIA CROSSING PLAT-1ST REVIEW

DATE:

SEPTEMBER 16, 2013




The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval:

1. Label Project# (S13-026) on all Sheets.

2. Roadway portion described in Deed recorded 08/09/12 #20122220441 (south of Valencia Rd) is an un-named road and will be an alignment to Valencia Crossing Drive which will extend south of Valencia Rd to the intersection of the existing Littletown Road. (Roadway will be named when plat of Valencia Crossing is recorded)

3. On "Pad Exhibit" on Sheet 1, please label Littletown Road on the southern boundary.
09/16/2013 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-RESIDENTIAL REVIEW Passed
09/18/2013 RONALD BROWN ZONING HC REVIEW Passed
09/18/2013 MICHAEL ST. PAUL ZONING REVIEW Denied CDRC TRANSMITTAL


FROM: Michael St Paul Planning Technician

PROJECT:
S13-026
4975 East Benson Highway
Block Plat


TRANSMITTAL: September 19, 2013


COMMENTS: Please attach a response letter with the next submittal, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Unified Development Code (Section 8.4.1) and the Administrative Manual (Section 2-07) were addressed.


The purposed subdivision is in the Valencia Crossing Planned Area Development (PAD 21 Ordinaance10984). A minor amendment to PAD 21 was approved on August 14th, 2013 (T13SA00220).

See the Criteria for a block plat (UDC 8.4.1.E).

UDC 8.4.1.C
Pre-application Conference Required
A pre-application conference in accordance with Section 3.2.1 is required.

AM 2-07.2.0
APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS
Plat application packets are available from the PDSD Department. Completed applications and accompanying materials are submitted to the PDSD. Incomplete or inaccurate applications will not be accepted, nor will any application in which the pre-application conference or neighborhood meeting requirements have not been met. Should an incomplete submittal be accepted for review, the applicant should be aware that, because of a lack in information, the review will take longer since comments cannot be finalized until after resubmittal when the required information is provided. The types of documents and the specific number of copies required of each the documents are on the PDSD website or may be obtained from the CDRC office.

COMMENT
The consultants attend a pre-submittal meeting and the final plat was approved for submittal on August 27th, 2013 (UDC 8.4.1.C & AM 2-07.2.0).

AM 2-07.5.H
The S(Year)-____ subdivision case number assigned to the approved tentative plat must be placed in the lower right corner of the plat next to the title block. If the property is subject to a rezoning case, the C9-__-___ rezoning case number is to be noted also.

COMMENT
Provide the subdivision case number (S13-026) in the lower right corner of each sheet of the final plat (AM 2-07.5.1.H).

AM 2-07.5.2.General Notes
The plat must include the following general notes. Additional notes specific to each project are r3equired when pertinent. Fill in the blanks with the project-specific information.

AM 2-07.5.2.C
Provide the following notes:

"Total miles of new public streets are ____."
"Total miles of new private streets are ____."

COMMENT
Provide the total miles of the new private street. Also label the private street as a common area rather than as a Block. A block can be sold, which implies a use, whereas a common area belongs to the development and can only be used as intended (in this case a private street). A Block must: "Result in lots of at least the minimum size required to build in conformance with applicable zoning including any natural, environmental and floodplain requirements" (UDC 8.4.1.E.6). Also see Definitions - B (UDC 11.4.3) for Block and Definitions - C (UDC 11.4.4) for both Common Area and Common Use.

Provide the parcel split for tax parcel 140-36-005A with the legal descriptions, parcel numbers and recording documentation. (See letter to David River from Daniel Castro, August 19, 2013.)

Additional comments may be necessary relative to additional information provided with subsequent submittals.
09/19/2013 PGEHLEN1 UTILITIES SOUTHWEST GAS Approv-Cond See letter and other documents in SIRE for SWG concerns
09/23/2013 ELIZABETH LEIBOLD ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied DATE: September 25, 2013
SUBJECT: Valencia Crossing Block Plat
REVIEWER: Elizabeth Leibold
ACTIVITY NUMBER: S13-026 Block Plat
ADDRESS: 4975 East Benson Hy

SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Development Services Department reviewed the Block Plat submittal, and does not recommend approval until the following comments are addressed.

BLOCK PLAT MASTER COVER SHEETS/ GENERAL NOTES:
1) AM 2-07.5.1.H: Provide the subdivision case number (S13-026) in the lower right corner of each sheet of the final plat.
2) Admin Man Sec. 2-07.5.H: Provide PAD, amendment, any rezoning, and subdivision case numbers in the lower right corner of each sheet.
3) UDC Sec.3.5.5.G: The proposed subdivision is located in PAD 21 - Valencia Crossing Planned Area Development (Ord.10984, PAD 21 minor amendment T13SA00220 approved 14AUG13). Submit copy of amendment/ordinance conditions to show compliance with requirements/conditions.
4) Admin Man Sec.2-07.5.2.C: Provide/clarify the following General Note: "Total miles of new public streets are ____." "Total miles of new private streets are ____."
5) Admin Man Sec.2-07.5.3.E: Correct verbiage for the ASSURANCE block per this section of requirements.
6) Tech Man Sec.10-01.6.1.H: On sheet 2 for temporary conditions between phases, label temporary construction/maintenance easement for cul-de-sac turn-around area for temporary conditions between phases.
7) UDC Sec.8.4.1.E.3: Provide access to the proposed lots in compliance with Section 7.8, Access, of the UDC and Sections 7-01.0.0, Pedestrian Access, and 10-01.0.0, Street Technical Standard, of the Technical Standards Manual. Also address the following comments:
a. Admin Man Sec.2-07.5.4.A: Indicate the name and width of each proposed street, easements (access or other type), and drainageway within the subdivision boundary being created by this plat. Label each as public or private, along with the appropriate dedication notation.
b. It appears a private street is proposed. Label as an access easement across Lots 2 and 3, or label the private street as a "Private Street" and/or Common Area rather than as a Block. A block can be sold, which implies a use, whereas a Common Area belongs to the development and can only be used as intended (in this case a private street). Per UDC Sec.8.4.1.E.6.A: Block must: "result in lots of at least the minimum size required to build in conformance with applicable zoning including any natural, environmental and floodplain requirements". Also see Definitions - B (UDC 11.4.3) for Block and Definitions - C (UDC 11.4.4) for both Common Area and Common Use.
c. Tech Man Sec.6.5.D: If Block A is a proposed as a street, the private street shall meet all criteria for public streets. Provide cul-de-sacs at end of Valencia Crossing Drive and at end of street labeled as "Block A".
8) Tech Man Sec.10-01.9.Fig.5: For proposed street radii at Valencia Road on sheet 2, label correct curb return radii per this standard.
9) Tech Man Sec.4-04.14.3.2. Add note to Final Plat stating (a) that the owner or owners shall be solely responsible for operation, maintenance, and liability for drainage structures and detention basins; (b) that the owner or owners shall have an Arizona Registered Professional Civil Engineer prepare a certified inspection report for the drainage and/or detention/retention facilities at least once each year, and that these regular inspection reports will be on file with the owner for review by City staff, upon written request; (c) that City staff may periodically inspect the drainage and/or detention/retention facilities to verify that scheduled and unscheduled maintenance activities are being performed adequately; and (d) that the owner or owners agree to reimburse the City for any and all costs associated with maintaining the drainage and/or detention/retention facilities, should the City find the owner or owners deficient in their obligation to adequately operate and maintain their facilities.
10) Admin Man Sec.2-07.5.4.E: For proposed drainage map in drainage report, show location of maintenance access ramp. Provide revised limits if necessary for Common Area A.
FINAL PLAT SURVEY RELATED COMMENTS:
11) Admin Man Sec.2-07.5.5: State whether horizontal boundary data for entire subdivision closes - provide closure document.
12) Admin Man Sec.2-07.5.4: Explain why only 3-ft drainage easement is provided along a portion of north property line. Explain maintenance access easement and drainage improvements along north boundary in drainage report and reflect requirements on plat.
13) Admin Man Sec.2-07.5.4: Erosion hazard setback created by proposed drainage improvement along south boundary is considered adverse impact to neighboring parcel. Shift improvements or revise so that no erosion hazard setback in incurred on property to the south of project. Otherwise obtain authorization with easement from property owner and show on plat.
14) Admin Man Sec.2-07.5.4.A: Assure that all easements listed on the Schedule B of title report are clearly drawn, labeled with Book/page or Docket/page, and/or listed as a blanket easement, and/or labeled with accurate dimensions and bearings on the plat. Blanket easements should be listed in the notes, together with recordation data and their proposed status. Provide a copy of the updated Title Report, Schedule B in resubmittal.
FINAL PLAT ASSURANCE COMMENTS:
15) Admin Man Sec.2-07.5.4.C: CC&R's reference "Common Areas & Easements" yet only a drainage area is shown on the plat. Revise CC&R's to reflect revised plat after comments are addressed.
16) UDC Sec.8.6.2.A.3: As a separate inspection from grading permit inspections, assurable items as listed in the third party trust must be complete and accepted by the City of Tucson prior to final release of final plat assurances associated with this project. Depending on revised plan clarifying the street improvement, make sure that the street is an assurable item on the assurances.
17) UDC Sec.8.6.2.A.3: The final plat cannot be scheduled for Mayor and Council consideration until the financial assurances are reviewed and approved. It appears there will be street improvements, survey monuments, and other assurable items. In response letter, state type of assurance proposed for the project. Submit the following:
a. If a third party trust is proposed for the subdivision assurances, provide:
i. original copy of the AGREEMENT TO CONSTRUCT SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENTS / THIRD PARTY TRUST with the assurable items list;
ii. original copy of the AMENDMENT TO TRUST / THIRD PARTY TRUST;
iii. assure that all exhibits are attached, and the case number "S13-022" is at the top of the first page of the AGREEMENT TO CONSTRUCT and AMENDMENT TO TRUST;
iv. copy of the original Trust Agreement;
v. copy of a sample Warranty Deed;
vi. copy of the current Title Report.
vii. The assurance descriptions shall match the title block description on the first sheet of the Final Plat. Please be aware that the legal office may reject assurance paperwork if the verbiage does not match exactly the verbiage on the Final Plat's Title Block.
b. For this and future projects, please provide a 8½" by 11" location map sheet for assurance submittals that go to Mayor & Council. Typically, these are similar to an enlarged location map on Final Plats.
18) Due to number of comments, additional comments may be provided at next submittal.

If you have any questions, please call me at 837-4934.

Elizabeth Leibold, P.E., CPM, CFM
Civil Engineer
Engineering Division
Planning & Development Services Department
09/24/2013 PGEHLEN1 COT NON-DSD TUCSON POLICE DEPARTMENT Approved Conditioned upon no additional comments from Parks and Recreation Staff.
09/24/2013 ED ABRIGO PIMA COUNTY ASSESSOR Denied Office of the Pima County Assessor
115 N. Church Ave.
Tucson, Arizona 85701

BILL STAPLES
ASSESSOR




TO: CDRC Office
Subdivision Review
City of Tucson (FAX# 791-5559)

FROM: Susan King
Pima County Assessor's Office
Mapping Department
520-724-4391

DATE: September 24, 2013


RE: Assessor's Review and Comments Regarding Final Plat
S13-026 Valencia Crossing


* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Plat meets Assessor's Office requirements.
___X___ Plat does not meet Assessor's Office requirements.


COMMENTS: Please add the number of miles of new private streets to the General Notes, even if the number is 0. I realize that Block "A" has the square footage and the acreage, but we still need the number of miles for the General Notes; we also need the Basis of Bearing in the General Notes.

NOTE: THE ASSESSOR'S CURRENT INVOLVEMENT IN PROCESSING ITS MANUAL MAPS TO DIGITAL FORMAT IS EXPEDITED GREATLY BY EXCHANGE OF DIGITAL DATA. IN THE COURSE OF RECORDING THIS SUBDIVISION YOUR ASSISTANCE IN PROVIDING THIS OFFICE WITH AN AUTOCAD COPY WOULD BE GREATLY APPRECIATED. THANK YOU FOR ANY DIGITAL DATA PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED.

Thanks you,

Susan King
09/24/2013 PGEHLEN1 COT NON-DSD TUCSON POLICE DEPARTMENT Approved I have no issue with this request.

CSO Becky Noel #37968
Tucson Police Dept
837-7428
09/25/2013 PGEHLEN1 ENV SVCS REVIEW Approved Hello Trish,

Here is the response:



The Block Plat has been reviewed on behalf of the City of Tucson Environmental Services Department and the submittal received on August 27, 2013 is approved. Please note the following: Approval of the above referenced submittal does not authorize construction of any solid waste facilities. Prior to the construction of such facilities, this department will need to review and approve any and all development and construction plans for compliance with solid waste collection facilities standards and construction details.



Let me know if you have any questions,

Ken
09/25/2013 PGEHLEN1 OTHER AGENCIES U. S. POST OFFICE Passed
09/25/2013 JOE LINVILLE LANDSCAPE REVIEW Approved
09/25/2013 JOSE ORTIZ COT NON-DSD TRAFFIC Denied Conditioned upon no additional comments from Parks and Recreation Staff.
09/25/2013 PGEHLEN1 UTILITIES CENTURYLINK Passed
09/25/2013 ROBERT YOUNG PIMA COUNTY PIMA CTY - DEV REVIEW Passed
09/25/2013 PGEHLEN1 UTILITIES EL PASO NATURAL GAS Passed
09/25/2013 JOSE ORTIZ COT NON-DSD TRAFFIC Denied From Zelin Canchola
TDOT Traffic Engineering
Date: September 25, 2013

S13-026 Valencia Crossing

Denied. Please Identify Block "A" if intended use will be a street.

Public Dedication required for use as street

Dimension right of way width.
09/25/2013 PGEHLEN1 OTHER AGENCIES PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS Passed Go ahead and exclude my review at this time

____________________________
Eric W. Kramer, Ph.D., AICP
Senior Land-Use Modeler



177 N. Church Ave, Suite 405
Tucson, AZ 85701
(520) 792-1093 x506 (tel)
(520) 620-6981 (fax)
www.pagnet.org
ekramer@pagnet.org


-----Original Message-----
From: DSD_CDRC DSD_CDRC [mailto:DSD_CDRC.DSPO2.CHDOM2@tucsonaz.gov]
Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2013 11:42 AM
To: Eric Kramer
Subject: Re: S13-026 VALENCIA CROSSING BLOCK PLAT

Eric -

This is just a block plat. No development proposed at this time. Shall I
deny your review at this time?

Thanks
Trish

>>> "Eric Kramer" <ekramer@pagnet.org> 09/25/2013 9:32 AM >>>
There is insufficient information to evaluate this development. We need
specific details about the land use and square footage of buildings.



____________________________

Eric W. Kramer, Ph.D., AICP

Senior Land-Use Modeler



PAG40MPOhoriz3.png



177 N. Church Ave, Suite 405

Tucson, AZ 85701

(520) 792-1093 x506 (tel)

(520) 620-6981 (fax)

www.pagnet.org

<mailto:ekramer@pagnet.org> ekramer@pagnet.org
09/25/2013 JANE DUARTE COT NON-DSD PARKS & RECREATION Approv-Cond Conditioned upon no additional comments from Parks and Recreation Staff.
09/25/2013 PGEHLEN1 OTHER AGENCIES TUCSON AIRPORT AUTHORITY Passed
09/26/2013 PATRICIA GEHLEN ZONING-DECISION LETTER REVIEW Reqs Change This review has been completed and resubmittal is required.

Please resubmit the following items:

1) Two rolled sets of the plans
2) A disk containing all items submitted
3) All items requested by review staff
4) All items needed to approve this plan

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
09/27/2013 CPIERCE1 REJECT SHELF Completed
09/27/2013 FERNE RODRIGUEZ OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed