Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Plan Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: MINOR SUBDIVISION REVIEW
Plan Number - S13-021
Review Name: MINOR SUBDIVISION REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 08/02/2013 | PGEHLEN1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 08/02/2013 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Passed | per addressing form |
| 08/05/2013 | PGEHLEN1 | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Passed | ES has no comments at this point. Jeff |
| 08/05/2013 | PGEHLEN1 | TUCSON WATER NEW AREA DEVELOPMENT | REVIEW | Approved | See letter in SIRE |
| 08/06/2013 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-RESIDENTIAL | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 08/07/2013 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Approved | Regional Traffic Engineering has no objections to the proposed development and supports its acceptance. Thank you. ________________________________ Confidentiality and Nondisclosure Notice: This email transmission and any attachments are intended for use by the person(s)/entity(ies) named above and may contain confidential/privileged information. Any unauthorized use, disclosure or distribution is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by email, and delete or destroy all copies plus attachments. . |
| 08/09/2013 | MICHAEL ST. PAUL | ZONING | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | Place the subdivision number (S13-021) in the lower right corner of each sheet. |
| 08/13/2013 | PGEHLEN1 | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Approved | No objections/adverse comments ____________________________ Eric W. Kramer, Ph.D., AICP Senior Land-Use Modeler PAG40MPOhoriz3.png 177 N. Church Ave, Suite 405 Tucson, AZ 85701 (520) 792-1093 x506 (tel) (520) 620-6981 (fax) www.pagnet.org <mailto:ekramer@pagnet.org> ekramer@pagnet.org |
| 08/19/2013 | LAITH ALSHAMI | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | Laith Alshami, Engineering and Floodplain Review, 08/23/2013, SUBJECT: South Yard Drill Track, Blocks 1-5 and Public Recreation Areas S13-021, T14S, R13E, SECTIONS 13 and 14 RECEIVED: Final Plat and Drainage Report on July 31, 2013 The subject submittal has been reviewed. The submittal can not be approved at this time. Address the following comments before review can continue. Prepare a detailed response that explains the revisions that were made and references the exact location on the Drainage submittal and the Block Plate where the revisions were made: Drainage Report: 1. The submitted a drainage report is approximately 20 years old. Verify that the information presented in the report still valid and submit, if necessary, a master drainage statement for this project that includes all drainage related information relevant to this subdivision. 2. Submit a drainage exhibit, for the subject subdivision, that shows all 100-year floodplain limits for all flows of 100 cfs or more. Additionally, include the regulatory floodplain water surface elevations. 3. Based on the results of the floodplain study, then proposed drainage easement dimensions shall be determined. 4. In order to ensure that the created parcels are developable, verify that all parcels will have all weather access. Additionally, verify that encroachment will not be an issue. 5. The master drainage statement shall determine the guideline under which the individual lot drainage report shall be prepared. 6. The master drainage statement must address how the lot to lot drainage will be managed regardless of which parcel will be developed first and the following parcels development sequence. It should be clearly stated that lot to lot drainage pattern shall be accommodated and maintained for post development conditions and shall not be blocked. 7. The master drainage report shall clearly state that a separate drainage report shall be submitted for every individual parcel at the time of its development. 8. The master drainage report shall address future drainage facilities maintenance responsibilities. Final Plat 1. The plat shall be stamped by a registered civil engineer and registered surveyor (A.M. 2-07.5.3.A). 2. Since this submittal does not have a tentative plat associated with it, submit a site plan that show all existing culture, existing grades or contour lines, and the 100-year floodplain limits and water surface elevations (UDC 8.4.1.A). 3. The parcels developability and suitability for development shall be determined during the block plat submittal. The City's regulations do not allow creating new lots/parcels that are not developable. Revise General Note #7 accordingly. 4. Provide the complete S13-021 case number on every sheet (A.M. 2-07.5.1.H). 5. Add a general note, which requires the submittal of a separate drainage report for each parcel, to address the proposed parcel drainage for pre and post development conditions (A.M. 2-07.5.2). 6. Determine if the owner(s) is an individual or more than one person and revise all "Certification" and "Dedication" accordingly. 7. If some or all parcels are subject to the floodplain requirements, add the following note: "Prior to issuance of any building permit, a Floodplain Use Permit is required for Lots/Parcels________". 8. Clarify if assurances are required to assure that all relevant assurable items (i.e. monuments, etc..) that need to be installed, shall be completed with this plat (A.M. 2-07.5.3.E). 9. If assurances are required and are submitted in the form of a third party land trust, a "Beneficiary" block need to be provided on the first sheet of the plat (A.M. 2-07.5.3.C). 10. Show, if applicable, all erosion hazard setback lines as required by A.M. 2-07.5.4.E. 11. Show the limits of all 100-year flood prone areas in a surveyable and readily retraceable manner with frequent ties to intersecting lot lines for all flows of 100 cfs or more (A.M. 2-07.5.4.F). 12. The dimensions of the proposed drainage easements may need to be revised based on the floodplain limits information (A.M. 2-07.5.5.B). 13. Do Blocks 1, 2 and 3 need no-vehicular access easements (A.M. 2-07.5.4.H)? 14. Are cross access easements required among the different parcels (A.M. 2-07.5.4.A) and (A.M. 2-07.5.5.B)? 15. In order to expedite the plat review and approval, provide the boundary survey and closure calculations report in accordance with A.M. 2-07.5.5.C.3. 16. Submit, if applicable, a copy of the assurances for review. |
| 08/19/2013 | PGEHLEN1 | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | PIMA COUNTY REGIONAL WASTEWATER RECLAMATION DEPARTMENT 201 NORTH STONE AVENUE TUCSON, ARIZONA 85701-1207 JACKSON JENKINS PH: (520) 724-6500 DIRECTOR FAX: (520) 620-0135 August 15, 2013 To: John A. Cahill, Property Agent City of Tucson Real Estate Program Thru: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager City of Tucson Development Services Department From: Francisco Galindo, P.E., Civil Engineer Development Liaison Unit Subject: FINAL BLOCK PLAT for South Yard Drill Track, Block 1-5 Final Plat - 1st Submittal, S13-021, Review Comments The drawings of the Final Plat for the proposed project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department (PCRWRD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The PDEQ and PCRWRD hereby reject the above referenced submittal of the Final Plat received by us on August 1, 2013, for the following reasons: 1. All Public Sewer Easements, access to public sewers and landscaping within public sewer easements shall be in accordance to the Pima County RWRD "Engineering Design Standards, 2012", Section 7. 2. Cover Sheet: The second paragraph of the Dedication shall read (I/We) herby grant to the public, Pima County, and all utility companies… 3. Add Township and Range to General Note No. 11. 4. Sheet 2: Revise the proposed "30' Unrecorded Sewer Easement" to 40' Public Sewer Easement Dedicated by this Plat. Easement widths must be in accordance to the Engineering Design Standards, 2012, Subsection 7.1.1. 5. Sheet 3: Revise the "Unrecorded License Agreement" to XX' Public Sewer Easement Dedicated by this Plat. The existing 36" sewer interceptor shall be in its entirety within a public sewer easement, public right-of-way or combination of both. The easement shall extend as a minimum 15 ft. southerly of the existing sewer interceptor and northerly to the proposed right-of-way line of 18th Street. Please note the following: An approval of the above referenced submittal does not authorize the construction of public or private sewer collection, or water distribution lines. Prior to the construction of such features, a Construction Authorization (approval to construct) will need to be obtained from PDEQ. If you have any questions regarding the above comments, please contact me at (520) 724-6733, Francisco.Galindo@pima.gov or Michael.Harrington@wwm.pima.gov at (520) 724-6305. Francisco Galindo, P.E. Planning and Engineering - Development Liaison Unit Cc: Michael J. Harrington, Sr. CEA Kurt Stemm, RWRD Chad Amateau, P.E., RWRD Project file, T14S, R13E, Sections, 13 and 14 |
| 08/22/2013 | PGEHLEN1 | COT NON-DSD | TUCSON POLICE DEPARTMENT | Approved | I have no issues with this request. CSO Becky Noel #37968 Tucson Police Dept 837-7428 |
| 08/23/2013 | RONALD BROWN | ZONING HC | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 08/27/2013 | JIM EGAN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | |
| 08/29/2013 | PGEHLEN1 | UTILITIES | SOUTHWEST GAS | Denied | August 26, 2013 City of Tucson Attn: Patricia Gehlen 201 N. Stone Avenue, 6th Floor Tucson, Arizona 85701 RE: S13-021/SOUTH YARD DRILL TRACK Final Block Plat for South Yard Drill Track Southwest Gas Corporation (SWG) has existing natural gas facilities located in Block 5 and the Public Recreation Areas of the proposed "Final Block Plat for South Yard Drill Track". SWG objects to the plat as presented. The plat does not indicate the prior rights for these facilities pursuant to a license agreement granted by the City's predecessor in interest to the property.This should be corrected on the plat. Additionally, in order to protect these facilities, SWG requests a perpetual easement be saved and reserved to SWG, without cost to SWG, as a condition of the recordation of the proposed Plat. The Applicant may request that the existing natural gas facilities be relocated. Said relocation shall be at the Applicant's expense, in accordance with SWG's approved Arizona Gas Tariff, and to a location satisfactory to SWG. Further information regarding natural gas facilities on or near this project may be acquired by contacting me at (520) 794-6265. Respectfully, Francisco Castro Engineering Supervisor Southern Arizona Division |
| 08/29/2013 | JANE DUARTE | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved | |
| 08/29/2013 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 08/29/2013 | ZELIN CANCHOLA | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | |
| 09/03/2013 | PGEHLEN1 | UTILITIES | CENTURYLINK | Passed | |
| 09/03/2013 | PGEHLEN1 | OTHER AGENCIES | TUCSON AIRPORT AUTHORITY | Passed | |
| 09/03/2013 | PGEHLEN1 | UTILITIES | EL PASO NATURAL GAS | Passed | |
| 09/03/2013 | JOHN BEALL | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Passed | |
| 09/03/2013 | ROBERT YOUNG | PIMA COUNTY | PIMA CTY - DEV REVIEW | Passed | |
| 09/03/2013 | PGEHLEN1 | OTHER AGENCIES | U. S. POST OFFICE | Passed | |
| 09/04/2013 | ED ABRIGO | PIMA COUNTY | ASSESSOR | Denied | Office of the Pima County Assessor 115 N. Church Ave. Tucson, Arizona 85701 BILL STAPLES ASSESSOR TO: CDRC Office Subdivision Review City of Tucson (FAX# 791-5559) FROM: Ada Griffin GIS Cartographer Pima County Assessor's Office DATE: August 16, 2013 RE: Assessor's Review and Comments Regarding: S13-021/SOUTH YARD DRILL TRACK _ * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Plat meets Assessor's Office requirements. ___X___ Plat does not meet Assessor's Office requirements. COMMENTS: " ALL ADJACENT SUBDIVISIONS SHOULD BE NAMED, WITH MAP AND PLAT IN THE APPROPRIATE AREAS AROUND THE SUBDIVISION. NOTE: THE ASSESSOR'S CURRENT INVOLVEMENT IN PROCESSING ITS MANUAL MAPS TO DIGITAL FORMAT IS EXPEDITED GREATLY BY EXCHANGE OF DIGITAL DATA. IN THE COURSE OF RECORDING THIS SUBDIVISION YOUR ASSISTANCE IN PROVIDING THIS OFFICE WITH AN AUTOCAD COPY WOULD BE GREATLY APPRECIATED. THANK YOU FOR ANY DIGITAL DATA PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED. |
| 09/05/2013 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | This review has been completed and resubmittal is required. Please resubmit the following items: 1) 4 rolled sets of the plans 2) 1 folded set for RWRD and fees(applicant is responible for submitting to RWRD). 3) a disk containing all items submitted to the city 4) all items requested by review staff 5) all items needed to approve the plans. |
| 09/05/2013 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Denied | Tucson Electric Power (TEP) has reviewed the final plat and does not approve. As you aware TEP has facilities within the proposed subdivision. An easement for these facilities will need to be granted by this plat in order for TEP's approval. Please contact me at 917-8744 if there are any questions. Thank you, Mary Burke Tucson Electric Power Sent from my iPhone |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 09/09/2013 | CPIERCE1 | REJECT SHELF | Completed |