Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Plan Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: MINOR SUBDIVISION REVIEW
Plan Number - S13-015
Review Name: MINOR SUBDIVISION REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 06/06/2013 | PGEHLEN1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 06/06/2013 | PGEHLEN1 | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | Per verbial discussion with Chad and Francisco plans may not be accepted until Sewer connections are shown. Will be submitted to RWRD with the 2nd submittal. |
| 06/06/2013 | PGEHLEN1 | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Approved | Here are my comments - DATE: 6/6/2013 CASE: S13-015 18TH/MAIN SUBDIVISION COMMENT: No objections or adverse comments Daily PM Peak Vehicle Trip Generation: 38 5 Thanks, -Eric Additional notes: See additional documents in SIRE |
| 06/07/2013 | PGEHLEN1 | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Approved | This project is approved for residential solid waste and recycle service. Jeff Drumm, P.E. Environmental Manager City of Tucson Environmental Services 520-837-3713 |
| 06/07/2013 | PGEHLEN1 | TUCSON WATER NEW AREA DEVELOPMENT | REVIEW | Approved | Letter is in SIRE |
| 06/07/2013 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Approv-Cond | TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: MICHELENE NOWAK, ADDRESSING REVIEW SUBJECT: S13-015/FINAL PLAT 18TH/MAIN SUBDIVISION DATE: June 7, 2013 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and we hereby approve this project subject to the following: Label Project #S13-015 on all sheets and in Title Block correct the legal to: Southwest Quarter of Section 13. . . on all sheets. 1.) Submit a 24 x 36 Reverse Reading Double Matte Photo Mylar or bond paper of approved Development Plan to City Planning. Signed and dated Mylar will be forwarded to Pima County Addressing prior to assignment of addresses. 2.) All addresses will need to be displayed per Pima County Address Standards at the time of final inspection. ***The Pima County Addressing Section can use digital CAD drawing files when submitted with your final plat Mylar. These CAD files can be submitted through Pima County Addressing. The digital CAD drawing files expedite the addressing and permitting processes when we are able to insert this digital data into the County's Geographic Information System. Your support is greatly appreciated.*** |
| 06/10/2013 | JIM EGAN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approv-Cond | An approved fire hydrant with the capability of providing 1,000GPM for 2hours at 20psi residual pressure is required to be within 600 feet of all exterior walls along the fire apparatus access route, for any future single family homes. Any commercial structures will require a higher fire flow with fire hydrants located closer. |
| 06/11/2013 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Approved | Regional Traffic Engineering has no comments on this submittal. The development has no effect on any ADOT facilities and Traffic Engineering supports its approval. Thank you. ________________________________ Confidentiality and Nondisclosure Notice: This email transmission and any attachments are intended for use by the person(s)/entity(ies) named above and may contain confidential/privileged information. Any unauthorized use, disclosure or distribution is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by email, and delete or destroy all copies plus attachments. . |
| 06/11/2013 | JOHN BEALL | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Passed | |
| 06/14/2013 | MICHAEL ST. PAUL | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL FROM: Michael St Paul Planning Technician PROJECT: S13-015 695 South Main Avenue Minor Subdivision, zone HC-3 TRANSMITTAL: June 14, 2013 COMMENTS: Please attach a response letter with the next submittal, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Unified Development Code (Section 8.4.1) and the Administrative Manual (Section 2-07) were addressed. 1) The consultants attend a pre-submittal meeting and the final plat for a minor subdivision was approved for submittal on May 2nd of 2013 (UDC 8.4.1.C). 2) "A final plat shall be approved and recorded within three years of the tentative plat approval date. A final plat is subject only to the ordinances in effect at the time of the tentative plat application except where an ordinance specifically states that it applies to pending applications" (UDC Section 8.5.2.A Final Plat Approval Period). 3) Place in both the lower and upper right corners, place "SEQ#_______" outside the margins. The County Recorder will fill in the blank at the time of recording (AM 2-07.5.1.D). 4) State in the title legal description on the lower right corner state that this is "a resubdivision of" a portion of lot 15…. (AM 2-07.5.1.E.3). 5) Place the subdivision case number (S13-015) in the lower right corner of each sheet next to the title block (AM 2-07.5.1.H). 6) The Certification of Title requires the name of the owner(s) to be printed and then signed (AM 2-07.5.3.B.1). 7) Your "Assurances" paragraph is incomplete (AM 2-07.5.3.E). |
| 06/18/2013 | ELIZABETH EBERBACH | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | TO: Everett Trueblood R.L.S., Scott Neeley R.A., Jeff Hunt P.E. at Cypress Engineering SUBJECT: S13-015 Final Plat 1st submittal Minor Subdivision Engineering Review ADDRESS: 695 S MAIN AV, Ward 6 LOCATION: T14S R13E Section 13 FLOODPLAIN: FEMA zone X-shaded, 100-year, 2278L REVIEWER: Elizabeth Leibold, P.E. SUMMARY: Engineering has reviewed and provided comments to the final plat sheets for18th and Main subdivision. Engineering does not recommend approval of the Final Plat at this time. Additional review of hydrology report for offsite conditions was also performed prior to completing 1st review of plat. PDSD accepts Drainage Report (Jeffrey P. Hunt sealed 07.01.2013) for Final Plat review purposes only. Report states that site is not impacted by jurisdictional floodplain (100 cfs or more for 100-year event), however, future buildings are recommended per discussion with consultant to be elevated due to 99 cfs expected in 18th Street. Prior to resubmittal, address the following plat comments. MASTER COVER SHEETS/ GENERAL NOTES: 1) Unified Development Code Section (UDC) 8.4.3.B.2: Provide note on plat or acknowledge in response letter that all utility services are available at plat boundary. 2) Administrative Manual Section (AM 2-07) 2-07.5.1.A: Location map must be revised to assure correct scale 3"=1 mile. 3) AM 2-07.5.1.D: Assure Book & Page are replaced with Sequence numbering format. Also check for correct placement - at lower right and upper right of sheet corners. 4) AM 2-07.5.1.E.3: State in legal description on lower right corner that this is "a resubdivision of" a portion of lot 15… 5) AM 2-07.5.1.H: Place subdivision case number (S13-015) in the lower right corner of each sheet next to the title block. 6) AM 2-07.5.3.A: Add word "I" to certification on sheet 1. 7) AM 2-07.5.3.B.1: On sheet 1, the Certification of Title requires the name of the owner(s) to be printed and then signed. 8) AM 2-07.5.3.B.3: Correct spelling and punctuation for the hold harmless paragraph. 9) AM 2-07.5.3.C: Complete beneficiary information on sheet 1. 10) AM 2-07.5.3.E: Assure last portion of Assurance paragraph is provided on sheet 1. ASSURANCE COMMENTS: 11) Technical Manual Section (TM) 10-01.4.7, UDC 8.4.3.B.4: The final plat cannot be scheduled for Mayor and Council consideration until the financial assurances are reviewed and approved. Any monuments, remaining sidewalk, and / or curb, that are not installed prior to final plat approval, will trigger need for assurances. In response letter, state type of assurance proposed for the project. Submit the following: a) If a third party trust is proposed for the subdivision assurances, provide: i) original copy of the AGREEMENT TO CONSTRUCT SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENTS / THIRD PARTY TRUST with the assurable items list; ii) original copy of the AMENDMENT TO TRUST / THIRD PARTY TRUST; iii) assure that all exhibits are attached, and the case number "S13-009" is at the top of the first page of the AGREEMENT TO CONSTRUCT and AMENDMENT TO TRUST; iv) copy of the original Trust Agreement; v) copy of a sample Warranty Deed; vi) copy of the current Title Report. vii) The assurance descriptions shall match the title block description on the first sheet of the Final Plat. Please be aware that the legal office may reject assurance paperwork if the verbiage does not match exactly the verbiage on the Final Plat's Title Block. b) For this and future projects, please provide a 8½" by 11" location map sheet for assurance submittals that go to Mayor & Council. Typically, these are similar to an enlarged location map on Final Plats. c) UDC 8.4.3.B.4: Explain when sidewalks will be provided in response letter. Also state whether required sidewalk and monuments are to be provided before going to Mayor and Council. SURVEY RELATED COMMENTS: 12) AM 2-07.5.5.A: Add survey information on planview to indicate that at least one corner of the plat shall be tied with bearing and distance to a section corner, a quarter section corner or an established COT survey monument. 13) AM 2-07.5.5.B: Assure that all easements listed on the Schedule B of title report are clearly drawn, labeled with sequence number or Book/page or Docket/page, and/or listed as a blanket easement, and/or labeled with accurate dimensions and bearings on the plat. Address the following easement related comments: a) Provide copy of the Title Report, Schedule B for current easement data. b) In response letter, please state whether each of the easement related items of Schedule are shown on the plat. c) If easements are relocated, not in use, or proposed for abandonment, then the documentation of the vacation/abandonment/relocation shall be submitted prior to approval of final development package plan. Blanket easements should be listed in the notes, together with recordation data and their proposed status. 14) Submit any ALTA survey in next submittal. 15) AM 2-07.5.5.C.4: Provide existing property corner nail information for SW corner of project, near north curb return. See attached portion of City of Tucson survey document. 16) AM 2-07.5.1.I: Some hatching & linetypes indicated on planview are not explained in legend; clarify/ add to legend. OTHER CONSIDERATIONS: 17) UDC 8.4.3.B.6: Per Pre-submittal meeting, a drainage statement may be necessary. In this case, the hydrology indicated a potential jurisdictional floodplain impacting the proposed subdivision. Per Tucson Code Sec. no land division can occur without a building pad out of any jurisdictional floodplain. Jeff Hunt from Cyprus Engineering provided HEC-RAS and calculation for existing grated inlet upstream from project to show that flows in 18th Street are just under the 100-year 100-cfs jurisdictional limit. Please acknowledge that any future development may be restricted by grading and drainage constraints and may require additional design considerations including but not limited to: restricted building sizes to accommodate swale at eastern edge of project to minimize potential for adverse impact to adjacent properties from offsite flows, and positive surface gradient in any proposed atrium/courtyard areas. Also, any finished floor elevation requirements shall be shown on future development plans. Submit revised Final Plat sheets, Title Report Schedule B, copy of ALTA if available, assurances (if needed), and response letter. Please call me to set up a meeting prior to resubmittal to expedite resubmittal review, or call for clarifications at 837-4934. Elizabeth Leibold, P.E., CPM, CFM Civil Engineer Engineering Division Planning & Development Services Department |
| 06/18/2013 | PGEHLEN1 | UTILITIES | SOUTHWEST GAS | Approv-Cond | See letter in SIRE |
| 06/21/2013 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-RESIDENTIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 06/24/2013 | RONALD BROWN | ZONING HC | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 06/25/2013 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | SUBJECT: 18TH AND MAIN - FINAL PLAT - MINOR SUBDIVISION S13-105 Tucson Electric Power Co. (TEP) has reviewed and approves the final plat received on June 6, 2012. If you have any questions, please feel free contact me at 917-8744. Thank you, Mary Burke Right of Way Agent Tucson Electric Power Co. Mail Stop HQW603 PO Box 711, Tucson, AZ 85702 Office - 520-917-8744 Cell - 520-401-9895 mburke@tep.com |
| 06/25/2013 | PGEHLEN1 | COT NON-DSD | TUCSON POLICE DEPARTMENT | Approved | I have no issues with this request. CSO Becky Noel #37968 Tucson Police Dept 837-7428 |
| 06/28/2013 | ED ABRIGO | PIMA COUNTY | ASSESSOR | Denied | Office of the Pima County Assessor 115 N. Church Ave. Tucson, Arizona 85701 BILL STAPLES ASSESSOR TO: CDRC Office Subdivision Review City of Tucson (Fax 520-791-5559) FROM: Suzanne Gilpin GIS Cartographer Pima County Assessor's Office DATE: June 28, 2013 RE: Assessor's Review and Comments Regarding Final Plat- 18th AND MAIN (MINOR SUBDIVISION) * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Plat meets Assessor's Office requirements. ___X___ Plat does not meet Assessor's Office requirements. COMMENTS: " There must be a Section Tie, with a bearing and dimension from the Section corner or Quarter corner to the Point of Tie on the subdivision. " The perimeter line must be solid and heaviest line weight on the plat. The lot lines and common area lines must be solid and the next heaviest. Lines for erosion setbacks, floodplain lines etc. should be the lightest line weight and be dashed or dot-dashed. " All adjacent subdivisions should be named, with map and plat in the appropriate areas around the subdivision. " Check ownership to make sure it matches WILLIAM SCOTT NEELEY. The notary acknowledgment is incorrect and should be corrected due to incorrect name and they are not signing on behalf of Title Security Agency as Trustee. The beneficiary disclosure block should also be removed. NOTE: THE ASSESSOR'S CURRENT INVOLVEMENT IN PROCESSING ITS MANUAL MAPS TO DIGITAL FORMAT IS EXPEDITED GREATLY BY EXCHANGE OF DIGITAL DATA. IN THE COURSE OF RECORDING THIS SUBDIVISION YOUR ASSISTANCE IN PROVIDING THIS OFFICE WITH AN AUTOCAD COPY WOULD BE GREATLY APPRECIATED. THANK YOU FOR ANY DIGITAL DATA PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED. |
| 07/01/2013 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 07/01/2013 | ZELIN CANCHOLA | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | |
| 07/02/2013 | JANE DUARTE | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Passed | No comments from Parks and Recreation. |
| 07/08/2013 | PGEHLEN1 | UTILITIES | EL PASO NATURAL GAS | Passed | |
| 07/08/2013 | PGEHLEN1 | OTHER AGENCIES | U. S. POST OFFICE | Passed | |
| 07/08/2013 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | This review has been completed and resubmittal is required. The following items must be resubmitted: 1) Two rolled sets of the plans 2) One folded set of plans for RWRD 3) One disk containing all items submitted 4) All items used to approve the plans. |
| 07/08/2013 | ROBERT YOUNG | PIMA COUNTY | PIMA CTY - DEV REVIEW | Passed | |
| 07/08/2013 | PGEHLEN1 | UTILITIES | CENTURYLINK | Passed | |
| 07/08/2013 | PGEHLEN1 | OTHER AGENCIES | TUCSON AIRPORT AUTHORITY | Passed |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 07/11/2013 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |