Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Plan Number: S11-044
Parcel: Unknown

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: REVISION - TENT PLAT & CORE RESUB

Plan Number - S11-044
Review Name: REVISION - TENT PLAT & CORE RESUB
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
07/12/2013 GBONILL1 START PLANS SUBMITTED Completed
07/19/2013 GARY WITTWER COT NON-DSD TDOT Denied Trish,
We have reconsidered the planting in the ROW on Houghton. We do not have any objections with the following consideration.
1. The extension of irrigation into the ROW be clearly marked in the field. Eric has indicated that it will be placed on a separate valve. Our concern is that when TDOT comes in and plants the area they will need to know where to shut off and disconnect prior to removal.

2. The owner must understand that the planting on Houghton will be removed when the new project comes in.

3. I did not check to see if all of the standard notes were on the plans, but the attached notes should be there. Eric usually has this covered.

Let me know if you have questions.

Gary

City of Tucson
Department of Transportation
Standard Notes for Planting in ROW

1. It is the owners responsibility to keep the Sight Visibility Triangles (SVT), and the pedestrian access area clear of vegetation at all times, per Land Use Code (LUC) section
2. Final plant locations must be in compliance with all utility setback requirements.
3. The owner understands that if the City of Tucson Transportation Department or any utility company needs to work within the ROW in the landscaped area, plants and irrigation may be destroyed without replacement or repair.
4. The owner takes full liability for this landscape and irrigation, and any damage to roadway, sidewalk and utilities.
5. The only private irrigation equipment that is allowed within the ROW are lateral lines, tubing and emitters that are not under constant pressure. All other equipment must be on private property. (excluding water meter)
6. Contractor to obtain a Right Of Way excavation permit prior to construction within the right-of-way.
07/25/2013 JOE LINVILLE LANDSCAPE REVIEW Denied 1) Include the Scenic Corridor Zone case number or the DRB case number on the plans. Submit documents regarding any related conditions and include decision letters (if applicable).

2) Variances from the SCZ standards are processed in accordance with Section 3.10.1 and 3.10.3, Board of Adjustment Variance Procedure. The Design Review Board reviews all requests for variances from SCZ standards and forward a recommendation to the Board of Adjustment as provided in Section 2.2.6.C.2.

It appears that a variance is required.

3) Indicate the limits of grading per A.M. 2-10.4.2.B. Provide revised grading plans as necessary if the elevations or limits are proposed to change.

4) A revisions variance for the NPPO may bee required based TDOT comments. Reuired transplants may not be located in the ROW if it the area is to be disturbed for upcoming construction.
07/30/2013 MICHAEL WYNEKEN ZONING-DECISION LETTER REVIEW Denied This review is complete and re-submital is required. Please submit a new response letter, two (2) rolled sets of plans, a disk containing all items submitted, any materials requested by the reviewers, and all materials required to complete the review.

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
08/19/2013 CPIERCE1 REJECT SHELF Completed
08/19/2013 CPIERCE1 OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed