Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Plan Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Plan Number - S11-044
Review Name: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 09/07/2011 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 09/07/2011 | RONALD BROWN | ADA | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 09/07/2011 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | COT NON-DSD | REAL ESTATE | Passed | |
| 09/08/2011 | DAVID MANN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approv-Cond | Fire Conditions: Final fire hydrants shall be per approved water plans and Fire Code. |
| 09/09/2011 | ED ABRIGO | PIMA COUNTY | ASSESSOR | Denied | Office of the Pima County Assessor 115 N. Church Ave. Tucson, Arizona 85701 BILL STAPLES ASSESSOR TO: CDRC Office Subdivision Review City of Tucson (FAX# 791-5559) FROM: Sherry Hyde Senior Property Technician Pima County Assessor’s Office DATE: 9/8/11 RE: Assessor’s Review and Comments Regarding S11-044 HOUGHTON TOWN CENTER TENTATIVE REVIEW * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Plat meets Assessor’s Office requirements. ___X___ Plat does not meet Assessor’s Office requirements. COMMENTS: THE TITLE BLOCK MUST BE IN THE LOWER RIGHT HAND CORNER. IT MUST HAVE THE NUMBER OF LOTS OR UNITS OR BLOCKS OR ANY COMBINATION OF THESE. IT MUST HAVE THE COMMON AREAS LISTED, IF THERE ARE ANY. IT MUST HAVE THE SECTION, TOWNSHIP AND RANGE AND IF IT IS A RESUBDIVISION, IT MUST MENTION THE PLAT NAME AND THE MAP & PLAT. GENERAL NOTES MUST HAVE THE GROSS AREA OF THE SUBDIVISON, THE NUMBER OF LOTS, THE NUMBER OF MILES OF NEW ROAD, PUBLIC OR PRIVATE, EVEN IF THE NUMBER IS 0 AND THE BASIS OF BEARING. THERE MUST BE A SECTION TIE, WITH A BEARING AND DIMENSION FROM THE SECTION CORNER OR QUARTER CORNER TO THE POINT OF TIE ON THE SUBDIVISION. THERE MUST BE BEARINGS AND DIMENSIONS FOR THE PERIMETER AND ALL LOT LINES AND ALL COMMON AREAS. ALL STREETS MUST BE NAMED IN THE FINAL PLAT AND HAVE DIMENSIONS, BEARINGS AND CURVE DATA. ALL ADJACENT SUBDIVISIONS SHOULD BE NAMED, WITH MAP AND PLAT IN THE APPROPRIATE AREAS AROUND THE SUBDIVISION. NOTE: THE ASSESSOR’S CURRENT INVOLVEMENT IN PROCESSING ITS MANUAL MAPS TO DIGITAL FORMAT IS EXPEDITED GREATLY BY EXCHANGE OF DIGITAL DATA. IN THE COURSE OF RECORDING THIS SUBDIVISION YOUR ASSISTANCE IN PROVIDING THIS OFFICE WITH AN AUTOCAD COPY WOULD BE GREATLY APPRECIATED. THANK YOU FOR ANY DIGITAL DATA PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED. |
| 09/13/2011 | PGEHLEN1 | COT NON-DSD | TUCSON POLICE DEPARTMENT | Approved | I have no issues with this proposal at this time. CSO Becky Noel #37968 Tucson Police Dept 1100 S Alvernon 837-7428 |
| 09/15/2011 | RONALD BROWN | H/C SITE | REVIEW | Denied | SHEET 1 1. Note 5: Please rephrase to read that all curb ramps are to meet ICC/ANSI 117.1, 2003 Edition requirements as per section 405 and 406. SHEET 6 2. Please provide a marked crossing at the N/E corner of the building across the one way vehicle access. 3. Also, need to reference a flush pedestrian island (detail 12/10) just to the right of the "STOP" sign painted in the asphalt paving. 4. As per the 2010 ADASAD, detectable warnings are not longer required at accessible routes that are flush with the PAAL. You may want to use something that is more economical and acceptable to the separation required by the LUC such as bollards, railings or a continuous 6" high curb. Please consult your zoning reviewer for exact requirements. a. Please follow the example WalMart at Bridges approved site development plan D11-0001 accessible parking design. This is identical to this situation and the final design is excellant. 5. Please provide a marked crossing from the accessible parking accessible route to the front entry accessible route. a. Insure that the markings are distinctly different from you overall front entry painted markings. b. Please insure that detectable warnings strips are located at both ends of the marked crossing just prior to entering the PAAL. Reference Walmart D11-001 layout. 6. Please insure and confirm on the drawings that all accessible route slopes are to comply with ICC/ANSI 117.1, Section 403.3. 7. Why isn't the curb ramp located at the NW vehicle access road not connected to the concrete accessible route heading NE? SHEET 10 8. Ditto, comment 5 9. As per the 2010 ADASAD, detectable warnings are not longer required at accessible routes that are flush with vehicle paving. You may want to use something that is more economical and acceptable for the separation required by the LUC such as bollards, railings, concrete wheel stops or a continuous 6" high curb. Please consult your zoning reviewer for exact requirements. END OF REVIEW |
| 09/19/2011 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Approved | >>> "Monica M. Soto" <MSoto@azdot.gov> 09/19/2011 8:58 AM >>> Regional Traffic Engineering has no comment on this submittal and recommends approval of the development. It will have no impact on any existing ADOT facilities. Thank you. Monica M. Soto Government Intern Arizona Department of Transportation Tucson District MSoto@azdot.gov<mailto:MSoto@azdot.gov> ________________________________ Confidentiality and Nondisclosure Notice: This email transmission and any attachments are intended for use by the person(s)/entity(ies) named above and may contain confidential/privileged information. Any unauthorized use, disclosure or distribution is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by email, and delete or destroy all copies plus attachments. . |
| 09/21/2011 | PAUL MACHADO | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | To: Patricia Gehlen DATE: September 21, 2011 CDRC/Zoning Manager SUBJECT: Houghton Town Center Tentative Plat S11-044 (First Review) T15S, R15E, Section 35 RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Tentative Plat and Drainage Report. The Tentative Plat (TP) and Drainage Report (DR) cannot be approved as submitted. Please address the following review comments prior to the next submittal. Tentative Plat: 1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the TP. 2. Submit the Subdivision Improvement Assurances for review. The following items are required in the assurance package if a Third Party Trust Agreement will be used: " Title Report " Special Warranty Deed " Trust Agreement " Amendment to Trust " Agreement to Construct 3. Submit the above documents containing original signatures, copies of the documents and signatures will not be forwarded to the City of Tucson attorney for review. 4. Please re-label all common areas that may be used in a dual and/or single use capacity per D.S. 2-03.6.4.C. For example, a Ret./Det. Basin may also be used as a recreation facility or only as a drainage facility or drainage channel and this must be reflected on the Final Plat. A key note explaining the labels could be used in conjunction with the labels, ie.: " Common Area "A" - Streets " Common Area "B" - Drainage/Recreation Facilities " Common Area "C" - Recreation Facilities " Common Area "D" - Drainage Facilities " Common Area "E" - Landscaping 5. Please label lot dimensions and bearings per D.S. 2-02.2.1.5 6. Label existing and future sight visibility triangles per D.S. 2-02.2.1.10. 7. Show all points of egress and ingress including locations and width of driveways and parking area access lanes (P.A.A.L.) per D.S. 2-02.2.1.11. 8. Please label all vehicular, bicycle, pedestrian, and handicapped circulation clearly identified per D.S. 2-02.2.1.12. 9. Fully-dimensioned loading space(s) and maneuvering area(s) per D.S. 2-02.2.1.14. 10. Show the limits of the 100-year floodplain and water surface elevation per D.S. 2-02.2.1.15. 11. Please provide Drainage patterns and finished grades per D.S. 2-02.2.1.16. 12. Please list estimated cut & fill quantities per D.S. 2-02.2.1.17. 13. Please show dimensioned right-of-way, including any applicable Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Plan right-of-way per D.S. 2-02.2.1.19. The proposed improvement plans for Houghton Rd. by the Regional Transit Authority are available through Tucson Department of Transportation and shall be shown on the plans. Contact Mo El-Ali for further details at 791-5100. 14. All easement of record must be graphically shown on the plan together with recording sequence number per D.S. 2-02.2.1.20. 15. Add the basin(s) maintenance responsibility note per S.M.D.D.F.M. 2.3.1.6 C 1 and 2 to the TP. 16. Dimension from street monument lines to existing and proposed curbs, sidewalks, driveways, and utility lines per D.S. 2-02.2.1.21. 17. Show all fences, walls, or vegetation for screening and sight visibility by type, material, height, location and spacing per D.S. 2-02.2.1.27. 18. Show Subdivision plat number (S11-044) and the blank reserved for the sequence number (bot. rt./upper rt. of each sht.) on all sheets per D.S. 2-02.2.1.29. 19. Show refuse container location, size, and access thereto fully dimensioned per D.S. 2-02.2.1.32 and D.S. 6-01.0. 20. A permit or a private improvement agreement will be necessary for any work performed within the Right-of-way. Contact Permits and Codes at (520) 791-5100 for permit information. 21. Please show a typical cross section of the P.A.A.L. or call out the percentage of slopes. Call out the GB at the D/W, if applicable. 22. Please show the proposed roof drainage patterns, 100% of the 10-year flow must be conveyed under the sidewalks including any other site drainage as well. Please provide supporting calculations to demonstrate compliance with D.S. 3-01.4.4. If the location(s) of the roof scuppers have not yet been decided, a general note indicating sidewalk scuppers will be used when the roof scuppers locations have been designed and located will suffice. 23. Add note: "Depress all landscaped areas 6" maximum for water harvesting". 24. "A grading permit and Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans (SWPPP's) will be required for this project. Submit 3sets of grading and SWPPP's with text, upon completion and submittal of a grading permit application. A grading permit may not be issued prior to site plan approval. Subsequent comments may be necessary, depending upon the nature and extent of revisions that occur to the plans". Drainage Report: 1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the DR. 2. DS Sec.9-06.5.0 MODIFICATIONS.DS Sec.9-06.5.1: A minor encroachment modification may be requested for necessary development in addition to the roadway, bike path, paved trail and utility improvements as provided in Development Standard 9-06.2.5.B.2 above. A minor encroachment under this subsection shall be approved if the loss of riparian resources does not impair the function of the habitat and the mitigation provides riparian resources of greater value if the request is granted. A modification under this subsection shall not exceed five percent (5%) of thetotal area of the Protected Riparian Area on the site. The mitigation shall be provided ona three to one ratio of new habitat for disturbed habitat. The mitigation shall be within the Protected Riparian Area or an area that directly connects with the Protected Riparian Areas. The mitigation shall be integrated with, and function as a part of, the Protected Riparian Areas. The requirements for the Environmental Resource Report may be modified by DSD staff as may be appropriate to document a minor encroachment under this subsection. 3. This review was performed for Tentative Plat purposes only. Final review and acceptance will done at the grading plan stage. 4. Addendums to any Drainage Reports and Hydrology Reports etc. are not accepted. The new layout or revisions must be incorporated into the approved Drainage Report. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 837-4932 or Paul.Machado@Tucsonaz.gov Paul P. Machado Senior Engineering Associate City of Tucson - Planning and Development Services Department 201 N. Stone Avenue P.O. Box 27210 Tucson, Arizona 85726-7210 (520) 837-4932 office (520) 879-8010 fax C:/9046 S. Houghton Rd. CDRC |
| 09/21/2011 | FRODRIG2 | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Denied | Date Case Number Project Address September 21, 2011 S11-044 HOUGUTON TOWN CENTER TENTATIVE PLAT Comments: Denied, The proposed Tentative Plat for Case No. S11-044, HOUGUTON TOWN CENTER dose not the meet the minimum requirements for Environmental Services, Solid Waste and Recycle Disposal Standard 6-01. The Tentative Plat must include recycle containers and must be shown and labeled on the site plan. All containers will require masonry enclosures with gates, and a detailed of the enclosures must be shown and dimensioned on the plans in accordance’s with the must current Development Standard No. 6-01.0. 3. Containers location must be clearly shown on the Plans and labeled for their intended us being Solid Waste or Recycle materials. A detail plan for the container enclosures must be shown on the plans with the inside dimension between the bollards. The minimum inside dimension must not be less than 10’- 0”. As shown on the must current Development Standard No. 6-01.0. . All enclosures must show the gates installed and mounted on the end of the CMU walls or mounted on separate post as show on Solid Waste Standards. The minimum inside dimension between the gates must not be less then 12’-0”. Environmental Services Department Development Plan Review Reviewer: Tony Teran Office Phone (520) 837-3706 E-mail: Tony.Teran @tucsonaz.gov |
| 09/21/2011 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1) Submit revised Native Plant Preservation and Riparian Mitigation plans. LUC 3.8 2) Ensure that the Landscape plans and related drawings have grading limits and phase designations consistent with the site and civil plans. DS 2-15.3.4.A 3) Revise the Tentative Plat to include landscape/irrigation easements for all proposed landscape and mitigation improvements. LUC 4.1.8.4 4) Define the boundaries of the DESCA area on the tentative and final plats. LUC 4.1.8.4 5) The approved landscape plans describe the scenic route buffer area as a "30' undisturbed landscape area". Retain this designation on this version and establish grading limits to protect the undisturbed area. LUC 2.8.2.4.A 6) The southern portion of the scenic route frontage indicates only a 150' ROW width. Confirm that the MS&R Plan is changing from 200' to 150'. Ensure that the 30' scenic route buffer area is located based on the adopted MS&R plan and designated ROW line. LUC 2.8.2.4.A 7) The approved Development Plan includes general notes regarding rain water harvesting and identifies specific areas through the use of keynotes. Revise these plans to preserve these important water harvesting elements. LUC 3.7.4.3.B |
| 09/21/2011 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Denied | AUDREY FARENGA ADDRESSING REVIEW PH #: 740-6800 FAX #: 623-5411 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: AUDREY FARENGA, ADDRESSING REVIEW SUBJECT: S11-044 HOUGHTON TOWN CENTER/TENTATIVE PLAT DATE: September 20, 2011 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval: Correct the parcels on the Project Description. Add Lots 1 – 60 on all title blocks. Label the approved interior street names on the Final Plat. |
| 09/21/2011 | TERRY STEVENS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Terry Stevens Lead Planner PROJECT: S11-044 Houghton Town Center Tentative Plat / Development Plan TRANSMITTAL: 09/21/2011 DUE DATE: 09/21/2011 COMMENTS: 1. Section 4.1.7.1, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a tentative plat. If, at the end of that time, the tentative plat has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this tentative plat is 09/06/2012. 2. DS 2-03.2.1.D.1 The area indicated on the location map does not include the entire subdivision. Revise. 3. DS 2-03.2.1.G.2 In the title block provide the number of proposed lots. 4. DS 2-03.2.2.B.1 This project has been assigned case number S11-044. Please place this number near the lower right corner of all sheets. 5. DS 2-03.2.2.B.4 List as a general note: "The number of lots is_____. 6. DS 2-03.2.2.B. Clearly indicate the boundaries of the NCDA-65 overlay zone. 7. DS 2-03.2.4.C This project appears to have common areas, label each common area individually with a separate letter designation. Enclose with a solid line each common area, private street, etc., that will have separate restrictions, a separate homeowners' association, or any common area that is separated by a public right-of-way. 8. DS 2-03.2.4.J If applicable, all proposed easements (utility, sewer, drainage, access, etc.) are to be dimensioned and labeled as to their purposes and whether they will be public or private. 9. DS 2-05.2.2.B.3 List proposed use as follows: General Manufacturing "35", subject to: Sec. 3.5.5.1 10. DS 2-05.2.2.D.3 Provide the widths of all PAALs, along the north side of the property, the west side of the building, the southeast side of the building, the south side of the building, etc. Clarify the vehicular use area at the northwest corner of the building. It appears to be some type of drive thru. If so comply LUC Sec. 3.3.7. LUC 3.3.6.8.A. Barriers, such as post barricades or wheel stop curbing, are required in a vehicular use area to prevent vehicles from extending beyond the property lines, damaging adjacent landscaping, walls, or buildings, overhanging adjacent sidewalk areas or unpaved areas, and/or driving onto unimproved portions of the site. Curbing missing near the northwest side of the building in the vehicle use area. Clearly indicate the location of the proposed bollards along the pedestrian circulation paths where flush with the pavement. The spacing of bollards are 5' OC not 6' OC as indicated. Revise keynote #4 sheet 6 of 10. 11. DS 2-05.2.4.D.1 If new streets are being created, whether public or private, they shall be designed in accordance with Development Standard 3-01.0. Indicate if streets are to remain private or are to be dedicated to the public. Provide the names of any proposed streets. Include fully dimensioned street widths, curbs, sidewalks, and utility locations. 12. DS 2-05.2.4.F The indicated future widening of Houghton Rd. must be clearly indicated for the full length of the eastern boundary of the subdivision. This will change the required 400' SCZ setback line and the location of the required 30' buffer. Revise. 13. DS 2-05.2.4.I All applicable building setback lines, such as erosion hazard, floodplain detention/retention basins, and zoning, including sight visibility triangles, will be shown. On zoning setbacks, if the building is proposed for location at a greater distance from the property line than the required setback, show only the dimension of the distance between the building and the property line. If the setback's point of measurement is not the property line, include the distance from the property line to the point of measurement. 14. DS 2-05.2.4.K Show on-site pedestrian circulation as required by the LUC utilizing location and design criteria in Development Standard 2-08.0. Clearly indicate the widths of all sidewalks, maintaining the minimum width of 4'. Such as at the southeast corner of the building. The pedestrian circulation path from the parking spaces located at the southeast side of the property does not connect to the building, missing a cross walk, and sidewalk thru the island. Per DS 2-08.4.1.B A sidewalk will be provided adjacent and parallel to any PAAL on the side where buildings are located. Missing along the southeast side and the northwest side of the building. 15. Any CC&Rs, cross access and cross parking agreements must be submitted prior to approval of the final plat. 15. This review is based on information provided, additional comments may be forth coming based on clarification of issues and changes to this plan. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Terry Stevens, (520) 837-4961 TLS C:\planning\cdrc\tentativeplat\S11-044tp.doc |
| 09/21/2011 | JOHN BEALL | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Denied | DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT S11-044 Houghton Town Center (X) Tentative Plat (X) Development Plan (X) Landscape Plan () Revised Plan/Plat () Board of Adjustment () Other CROSS REFERENCE: SE-06-23 Home Depot, D9-0007 & BOA S-08-14 NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Esmond Station Area Plan GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: NO = This portion of the project does not front Houghton Road COMMENTS DUE BY: 9/21/11 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: () No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment () Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions () RCP Proposal Complies with Plan Policies (X) See Additional Comments Attached () No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: (X) Resubmittal Required: (X) Tentative Plat (X) Development Plan (X) Landscape Plan () Other REVIEWER: msp 837-6971 DATE: 9/15/11 Community Planning Section S11-0044 Houghton Town Center September 15, 2011 Staff offers the following comments: 1. Please include verbatim, Special Exception SE-06-23 conditions as approved by Mayor and Council under Ordinance 10327. 2. Special Exception condition # 10 requires a minimum eight (8) foot wide sidewalk along the full length of the front of any building to an entrance where it adjoins a parking lot. As shown on sheet 6 of 10, a segment of sidewalk along the front of the building, which abuts a parking lot, is only six (6) feet wide. Please correct to comply with SE condition # 10. 3. Please revise tentative plat/development plan by adding a wall detail (elevation) that complies with Special Exception condition # 19. Wall detail t shall include the requirements of Special Exception Condition #19. |
| 09/21/2011 | PAUL MACHADO | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | To: Patricia Gehlen DATE: September 29, 2011 CDRC/Zoning Manager SUBJECT: Houghton Town Center Tentative Plat/Development Package, S11-044 (Supplemental First Review) T15S, R15E, Section 35 RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Tentative Plat and Drainage Report. The Tentative Plat (TP), Development Package (DP) and Drainage Report (DR) cannot be approved as submitted. Please address the following review comments prior to the next submittal. Tentative Plat/ Development Package: 1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the DP. 2. A three (3) inch by five (5) inch space shall be reserved in the lower right quadrant of each sheet for an approval stamp. D.S. 2-01.2.5. 3. A small, project-location map shall be provided in the upper right corner of the cover sheet. D.S. 2-01.2.6. 4. The north arrow, contour interval, and scale as applicable to each sheet should be placed together in the upper right corner of each sheet. D.S. 2-01.2.7. 5. The plan drawing shall be oriented with north toward the top of the sheet. If it is not practical to orient north to the top of the sheet, the plan drawing shall be oriented with north to the left side of the sheet. D.S. 2-01.2.8. 6. A key plan (if provided) shall be located on the first sheet. D.S. 2-01.2.10. The key plan does not cover the entire project. Revise as required. 7. The title block shall include the following information. D.S. 2-01.3.2. A. The proposed name of the project or subdivision, or if there is no name, the proposed tenant's name. B. A brief legal description and a statement as to whether the project is a resubdivision are to be provided. On re-subdivisions, provide the recording information of the existing subdivision plat. C. The number of proposed lots and common areas are to be noted. If the subdivision is a Residential Cluster Project (RCP), a condominium, or a similar type of residential subdivision utilizing special provisions of the LUC, it shall be so noted. D. The administrative street address. 8. Relevant case numbers (development package document, rezoning, board of adjustment, DDO, MDR, DSMR, overlay, etc.) shall be provided adjacent to the title block on each sheet. D.S. 2-01.3.3. 9. When the development package documents consists of more than one (1) sheet, a sheet index (a legible drawing of the site showing the area represented on each sheet) is to be placed on the cover sheet or the second sheet. D.S. 2-01.3.5. See note no. 6. 10. General Notes. The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. D.S. 2-01.3.7. 6. List special exceptions, zoning variances, zoning and development standard modifications, overlay zones, and other reviews that are applicable to the project. a. List special exceptions, variances, and modifications such as Sec. 2.8.10.8, Modification of Development Regulations (MDR), Sec. 5.1.7, Board of Adjustment (BOA), Sec. 5.1.8, Design Review Board (DRB), Sec. 5.1.9, Historical Commission, Sec. 5.1.10, Historic District Advisory Board (HDAB), Sec. 5.3.4 and 5.3.5, a Design Development Option (DDO), 5.3.9 Special Exception Land Uses, Sec. 5.4.1 and General Legislative Procedures, and 5.4.3 Zoning Examiner Legislative Procedure (SE), or DS 1-01.0, Development Standard Modification Request (DSMR), by case number, in lower right corner of each sheet. As a general note provide the case number, date of approval, what was approved, and the conditions of approval. b. List overlay zones that are applicable to the property, such as Sec. 2.8.1, Hillside Development Zone (HDZ); Sec. 2.8.2, Scenic Corridor Zone (SCZ); Sec. 2.8.3, Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Setback Zone; Sec. 2.8.4, Gateway Corridor Zone; Sec. 2.8.5, Airport Environs Zone (AEZ); Sec. 2.8.6, Environmental Resource Zone (ERZ); Sec. 2.8.7, Downtown Heritage Incentive Zone; Sec. 2.8.8, Historic Preservation Zone (HPZ), 2.8.9 Drachman School Overlay (DSO), or 2.8.10 Rio Nuevo And Downtown (RND) of the LUC; or Sec. 29-12 through 29-19 Watercourse Amenities, Safety, and Habitat (WASH) Ordinance of the Tucson Code, by case number, in lower right corner of each sheet. As a general note state that the project is designed to meet the overlay zone(s) criteria, and provide the case number, date of approval, what was approved, and conditions of approval. If there is more than one (1) lot within the site, the note should specify which lots are affected by the overlay zones. Projects involving Historic Preservation Zones, Downtown Heritage Incentive Zones (involving demolition), or overlay zones, require separate review and approval. B. Drainage Notes. List the following notes as appropriate. 1. List the following notes on all plans/plats. 2. If applicable, list the following notes and complete the blanks. a. "The following lots are affected by the City of Tucson Floodplain Regulations: _________." (List the lots affected by lot number.) In the case of one (1) lot development, substitute the words, "This project is affected by the City of Tucson Floodplain Regulations." b. "A floodplain use permit and/or finished floor elevation certificates are required for the following lots: __________." (List the lots affected by lot number, or in the case of a one (1) lot development, place a period after the word "required" and delete the remainder of note. 3. List the following note on all development package documents a. "Drainage will remain in its natural state and will not be altered, disturbed, or obstructed other than as shown on this (site or development) plan." C. Streets and Roads Notes. 1. List the following note if applicable: "All new public roads within and adjacent to this project will be constructed in accordance with approved plans. Construction plans will be submitted to the City Engineer's Office for review and approval." 3. Provided the following notes as applicable: a. "Total miles of new public streets is ____________. b. Total miles of new private streets is ____________. F. Trails Notes. List the following notes as appropriate. 1. If a trail or path is proposed, provide a note, as appropriate, indicating that a trail or path will be constructed for public or private use, the general location of the trail or path, and whom it will be constructed and maintained by. If it is intended to connect to an offsite feature, such as an exiting trail, wash, sidewalk, road, commercial or residential development, etc., so indicate. If the trail or path is to be dedicated, indicate the method of dedication. 2. If a new trail or path will be constructed, add the following note, as appropriate: "All new onsite and offsite trails or paths constructed in conjunction with this project will be constructed in accordance with approved plans. Construction plans will be subject to the review and approval of the City's Parks and Recreation Department, and, if requested, Pima County Natural Resources, Parks and Recreation." 11. Existing Site Conditions. The following information shall be provided on the plan/plat drawing to indicate the existing conditions on site and within fifty (50) feet of the site. On sites bounded by a street with a width of fifty (50) feet or greater, the existing conditions across the street will be provided. D.S. 2-01.3.8. A. Provide site boundary/subdivision perimeter information, including bearing in degrees, minutes, and seconds, with basis for bearing noted, together with distances in feet, to hundredths of a foot, or other functional reference system. B. All easements shall be drawn on the plan. The recordation information, location, width, and purpose of all easements on site will be stated. Blanket easements should be listed in the notes, together with recordation data and their proposed status. Should an easement not be in use and be proposed for vacation or have been abandoned, so indicate. However, should the easement be in conflict with any proposed building location, vacation of the easement shall occur prior to approval of plan unless written permission from easement holder(s) is provided. C. The following information regarding existing private or public right-of-way adjacent to or within the site shall be provided: the name, right-of-way width, recordation data, type and dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks. D. The following information regarding existing utilities shall be provided: the location and size of water wells, water pumping plants, water reservoirs, water lines, fire hydrants, sanitary and storm sewers, including the pipe diameter and the invert and rim elevations of all manholes and cleanouts; the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD) reference number; locations of gas lines, electric and telephone lines, poles, and communications cables, on-ground junction boxes, and street lights. If water mains and sewers are not located on or adjacent to the tract, indicate the direction, distance to, and sizes of those nearest the property. Identifying the locations of all utilities and service equipment immediately adjacent to the project is especially important in situations where pedestrian and vehicular access and circulation or landscaping can be in conflict. By knowing the location of the existing utilities, design of the project can take those elements into consideration and can help avoid expensive and time-consuming relocation of utilities, major redesign, or requests to vary regulations after commencement of construction. E. Indicate the ground elevation on the site based on City of Tucson Datum (indicate City of Tucson field book number and page). G. Other significant conditions on the site, such as major rock outcrops, structures, fences, walls, etc., shall be shown. These elements should be indicated in a different line weight than the proposed improvements and labeled "to be removed" or "to be retained." The proposed improvement plans for Houghton Rd. by the Regional Transit Authority are available through Tucson Department of Transportation and shall be shown on the plans. Contact Mo El-Ali for further details at 791-5100. H. Conditions on adjacent land significantly affecting the design of the project will be shown, such as the approximate direction and gradients of ground slope; character and location of adjacent development; and drainageways, arroyos, ditches, and channels, including their existing conditions. I. Floodplain information, including the location of the 100-year flood limits for all flows of one hundred (100) cfs or more with 100-year flood water surface elevations, shall be indicated. 1. Where natural floodprone areas, such as washes, channels, drainageways, etc., exist within the development document boundaries of the drawing, water surface contours for the 100-year flood with water surface elevations indicated must be shown and clearly labeled. 2. The linear distance between water surface contour intervals should not exceed two hundred (200) feet unless prior agreement has been made with the City Floodplain Engineer or designee. 3. A symbol identical to that used to represent the water surface contour intervals on the development package documents should be included in the legend. 12. Information on Proposed Development. The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. D.S. 2-01.3.9. A. Draw in all proposed lot lines with approximate distances and measurements. B. Identify each block or lot by number within the subdivision boundary and include the approximate square footage of each, or a note may be provided stating that all lots comply with the minimum lot size requirements. C. If the project has common areas, label each common area individually with a separate letter designation. Enclose with a solid line each common area, private street, etc., that will have separate restrictions, a separate homeowners' association, or any common area that is separated by a public right-of-way. E. Proposed land splits or existing lot lines shall be drawn on the plan with dimensions and the identification number and approximate square footage of each lot. (Please be aware that, if land division occurs and the number of lots falls within the definition of subdivision, a subdivision plat is required.) G. If the project is to be phased, provide calculations, setbacks, etc., to indicate that each phase complies with all requirements as a separate entity. Show phase lines on the drawing. Show and label any temporary improvements that may be needed to make the site function for each phase as one entity. If such temporary improvements are off the site of the phase under consideration, a temporary easement or other legal documentation to assure legal use of the property is required. Note recording information. H. Proposed traffic circulation: 1. Proposed traffic circulation will be designed in accordance with Street Development Standard 3-01.0, to include streets, intersections, street names, right-of-way widths, curve radii of centerlines and curb returns, and proposed improvements, such as pavement, curbs, access points (driveways), handicap ramps, and sidewalks. Street improvements, such as sidewalks, curbs, pavement, and handicap ramps, do not need to be drawn on the plan if such information is provided on typical street cross sections. Please be aware that, if a new street is created (for other than for subdivisions) which divides the property into two (2) or more lots, a subdivision plat is required (refer to the definition of subdivision in Sec. 4.1.2 of the LUC). 2. Show future and existing sight visibility triangles. On a designated MS&R street, the sight visibility triangles are based on the MS&R cross-section. 4. Indicate if existing streets are public or private; provide street names, widths, curbs, sidewalks, and utility locations, all fully dimensioned. 5. If utilizing parking area access lanes (PAALs), they shall be designed in accordance with Sec. 3.3.0 of the LUC and Development Standard 3-05.0. a. Show all motor vehicle off-street parking spaces provided, fully dimensioned. As a note, provide calculations on the number of spaces required (include theratio used) and the number provided, including the number of spaces required and provided for the physically disabled. The drawing should indicate parking space locations for the physically disabled. A typical parking space detail shall be provided for both standard parking spaces and those for the physically disabled. For information on parking requirements for the physically disabled, refer to adopted building and accessibility codes of the City of Tucson. Design criteria for parking spaces and access are located in Development Standard 3-05.0. 6. If the project is phased, the phase under consideration shall be designed so those later phases are assured legal access. If such access is provided through the phase under consideration, public streets are required, or access easements must be delineated and dedicated for such use. If private easements are utilized, protective covenants establishing the right of access and incorporation of future phases into this project are required. 7. If streets are proposed, indicate if they are designed for on-street parking to accommodate visitor parking or if parking is provided in common parking areas. Visitor parking is to be evenly distributed and usable by all residents of the project. Extra parking on individual lots, such as tandem parking in driveways, does not count toward visitor parking, as it is not available to other property owners within the project. Design criteria for streets are located in Development Standard 3- 01.0. Streets designed at the minimum width, without on-street parking, need clearance for access to all homes by life safety vehicles and, where no alleys are provided, by refuse collection vehicles. If motor vehicles are parked along streets that are not designed to allow for parking, life safety services will be inhibited and, in many situations, blocked. I. Show all right-of-way dedications on or abutting the site and label. If the development package documents have been prepared in conjunction with a subdivision plat or is required as a condition of approval of a review process, such as a rezoning, street dedications in accordance with the Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Plan may be required by these processes. Projects bounded by streets having only a portion of the right-of-way width dedicated will be required to dedicate right-of-way, up to one-half (½), to complete the street width. Should there be any proposed street or alley vacation, provide this information. If vacation has occurred, include the recording information. J. If street dedication is not required or proposed and the project site is adjacent to a Major Street or Route, draw the Major Street right-of-way lines for those streets. (Add the MS&R future sidewalk, right-of -way lines, sight visibility triangles, etc.) K. Identify and provide dimensions, approximate areas in square footage, and purposes of any lots proposed for edication (such as open spaces, recreation areas, or natural areas) or for reservation for a public use (such as public parks, water facilities, or school sites). L. All proposed easements (utility, sewer, drainage, access, etc.) are to be dimensioned and labeled as to their purposes and whether they will be public or private. N. In conjunction with a drainage report or statement, as applicable, prepared in accordance with the City Engineer's instructions and procedures, the following information will be indicated on the development package documents. For additional information regarding drainage standards, see the City of Tucson Standards Manual for Drainage Design and Floodplain Management. 1. Show areas of detention/retention including 100-year ponding limits with water surface elevations. 2. Indicate proposed drainage solutions, such as origin, direction, and destination of flow and method of collecting and containing flow. 3. Provide locations and types of drainage structures, such as, but not limited to, drainage crossings and pipe culverts. 4. Indicate all proposed ground elevations at different points on each lot to provide reference to future grading and site drainage. 6. The 100-year flood limits with water surface elevations for all flows of one hundred (100) cfs or more will be drawn on the development package documents. 7. Draw locations and indicate types of off-site runoff acceptance points and/or onsite runoff discharge points. O. All applicable building setback lines, such as erosion hazard, floodplain detention/retention basins, and zoning, including sight visibility triangles, will be shown. T. Show existing or proposed pedestrian circulation along abutting rights-of-way. Such sidewalks must comply with accessibility requirements for the physically disabled and the design criteria in Development Standard 3-01.0. Show refuse collection areas, including locations of dumpsters, screening location and materials, and vehicle maneuverability, fully dimensioned, and access route. If dumpster service is not proposed, indicate type of service. For specific information on refuse collection, refer to Development Standard 6-01.0. Refuse collection on all projects shall be designed based on that Standard, even if collection is to be contracted to a private firm. 13. Subsequent comments may be necessary depending upon the nature and extent of revisions that occur to the plans due to the requirements of the flood plain ordinance. A SWPPP was not found in this submittal. Submit two copies of the SWPPP with the re-submittal of the Tentative plat/Development Package. 14. DS Sec.2-03.2.4.K: Submit a conceptual grading plan with the next submittal that shows drainage and grading feasibility for the proposed project. Drainage Report: 1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the DR. 2. Addendums to any Drainage Reports and Hydrology Reports etc. are not accecpted. The new layout or revisions must be incorporated into the approved Drainage Report. 3. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the DR. 4. DS Sec.9-06.5.0 MODIFICATIONS.DS Sec.9-06.5.1: A minor encroachment modification may be requested for necessary development in addition to the roadway, bike path, paved trail and utility improvements as provided in Development Standard 9-06.2.5.B.2 above. A minor encroachment under this subsection shall be approved if the loss of riparian resources does not impair the function of the habitat and the mitigation provides riparian resources of greater value if the request is granted. A modification under this subsection shall not exceed five percent (5%) of thetotal area of the Protected Riparian Area on the site. The mitigation shall be provided ona three to one ratio of new habitat for disturbed habitat. The mitigation shall be within the Protected Riparian Area or an area that directly connects with the Protected Riparian Areas. The mitigation shall be integrated with, and function as a part of, the Protected Riparian Areas. The requirements for the Environmental Resource Report may be modified by DSD staff as may be appropriate to document a minor encroachment under this subsection. 5. This review was performed for Tentative Plat purposes only. Final review and acceptance will done at the grading plan stage. 6. Addendums to any Drainage Reports and Hydrology Reports etc. are not accepted. The new layout or revisions must be incorporated into the approved Drainage Report. 7. Greater detail of the basin, x-sections, rip-rap size, dimensions for aprons etc. shall be shown on the plans. 8. It appears that some improvements are being constructed within the drainage easements. Any development and or improvements, other than improvements solely used for drainage, shall not be located in a dedicated drainage way. 9. Add the basin(s) maintenance responsibility note and checklist per S.M.D.D.F.M. 2.3.1.6 C 1 and 2 to the DR. 10. Per the Rita Ranch Master Drainage Report, there is a substantial amount of runoff discharging from the basin at the SW corner of the project that has not been accounted for. Please explain. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 837-4932 or Paul.Machado@tucsonaz.gov Paul P. Machado Senior Engineering Associate City of Tucson - Planning and Development Services Department 201 N. Stone Avenue P.O. Box 27210 Tucson, Arizona 85726-7210 (520) 837-4932 office (520) 879-8010 fax C:/9046 S. Houghton Rd. CDRC 2 supplement |
| 09/21/2011 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | PIMA COUNTY REGIONAL WASTEWATER RECLAMATION DEPARTMENT 201 NORTH STONE AVENUE TUCSON, ARIZONA 85701-1207 JACKSON JENKINS PH: (520) 740-6500 DIRECTOR FAX: (520) 620-0135 September 20, 2011 To: BRUCE PATON, P.E. RICK ENGINEERING COMPANY, INC Thru: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager City of Tucson Development Services Department ____________________________________________ From: Tom Porter, Sr. CEA (520-740-6719), Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department Subject: HOUGHTON TOWN CENTER Dev. Plan – 1st submittal S11-044 The Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department (PCRWRD) has reviewed the proposed sewer collection lines for the above-referenced project. The following comments are offered for your use: Sheet 1: Revise sewer legend symbology to match information shown in plan views. Ref. A Sheets 4-9: Show on plan flow arrows for all existing and proposed sewer. Ref. A Sheet 4: Revise the IMS# shown for the existing MH on plan. Ref. A Sheet 7: Show the sheet match lines on plan. Ref. A Sheet 9: Show the proposed sewer in its entirety to the point of connection to the existing public sewer. Ref. A This office will require a revised set of bluelines, and a response letter, addressing these comments. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. Pima County Code Title 13.20.030.A.2 requires that a wastewater review fee be paid for each submittal of the development plan. The fee for the first submittal is $166 plus $50 per sheet. For the second submittal, the review fee is $50 per sheet. For all subsequent submittals, the review fee is $39 per sheet. The next submittal of this project will be the second(2nd) submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $200.00 (made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER) must accompany the revised set of bluelines and response letter. If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly. cc: Chad Amateau, PE Checked by:_________ Kristin Greene, PE, DLU Manager DLU Project folder Ref. A. Development Plan Checklist Requirements – Chapter 18.71 of the Pima County Code - Section J http://www.pimaxpress.com/SubDivision/Documents/2006/DP_Requirements2Aug04.pdf Ref. C - Arizona Administrative Code, Title 18, Chapters 5 & 9 (R18-5-205) http://www.azsos.gov/public_services/Title_18/18-05.htm and (R-18-9-E301) http://www.azsos.gov/public_services/Title_18/18-09.htm Ref. D - PCRWRD Procedures, Preliminary Sewer Layout Requirements, 1984 (revised April 1988) http://www.pima.gov/wwm/eng/stddet/pdf/procedures.pdf Ref. E - PCRWRD Design Standards for Public Sewerage Facilities, 1983 (revised April 1988) http://www.pima.gov/wwm/eng/stddet/pdf/design_standards.pdf Ref. F - City of Tucson/Pima County Standard Details http://www.pima.gov/wwm/eng/stddet/pdf/all_det.pdf Ref. G - Pima County Code of Ordinances, Title 13 - Public Services, Division II - Sewers http://library.municode.com/index.aspx?clientID=16119&stateID=3&statename=Arizona Ref. H - City of Tucson/Pima County Standard Specifications for Public Improvements, 2003 Edition http://dot.pima.gov/transeng/stdspecsdet/standardspecs2003.pdf Ref. I - PCRWRD Engineering Directives http://www.pima.gov/wwm/eng/directives/ |
| 09/22/2011 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Denied | 4350 E. Irvington Road, Tucson, AZ 85714 Post Office Box 711, Tucson, AZ 85702 WR#241640 September 21, 2011 Dear : Robert Tucker: SUBJECT: Houghton Town Center S11-044 Tucson Electric Power Company has reviewed and disapproved the development plan submitted September 16, 2011. It appears that there are conflicts with the existing facilities within the boundaries of this proposed development. There is an existing approved electrical design for the development. Re-design fees will be required once new plans have been received. Please show all existing overhead and underground lines as well as all facilities located within this development and offsite. There is currently a Public Improvement project along Houghton Road that could affect pole locatons and how we may be able to serve this development. Any changes of grade at existing facilities will need to be reviewed individulally and any costs involved will be billable to the customer. All existing facilities require drivable access and easements. Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facilities map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. In order to apply for electric service, call the New Construction Department at (520) 918-8300. Submit a final set of plans including approved site, offsite and electrical load plans. Include a CD with the AutoCAD version of the plans. If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Your final plans should be sent to: Tucson Electric Power Company Attn: Ms. Rich Harrington New Business Project Manager P. O. Box 711 (DB-101) Tucson, AZ 85702 520-917-8726 Please call the area Designer Jessica Marchbanks at 917-8737, should you have any questions. Sincerely, Henrietta Noriega Office Specialist Design/Build hn Enclosures Cc T. Stocksdale, Tucson Electric Power P. Gehlen, City of Tucson (E-Mail) |
| 09/22/2011 | PGEHLEN1 | TUCSON WATER NEW AREA DEVELOPMENT | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 09/22/2011 | PGEHLEN1 | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Passed | |
| 09/22/2011 | JOSE ORTIZ | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Denied | Rejected 1. Resubmit exhibit to reflect offsite improvements to be made with this development on TDOT Roadways 2. Coordinate with TDOT Project Manager for the Houghton Road improvement project, and Jose Ortiz, Traffic Engendering, for Private Improvement Agreement requirements. Review conducted by Zelin Canchola |
| 09/22/2011 | ROBERT YOUNG | PIMA COUNTY | PIMA CTY - DEV REVIEW | Passed | |
| 09/22/2011 | PGEHLEN1 | OTHER AGENCIES | TUCSON AIRPORT AUTHORITY | Passed | Not in TIA AEZ |
| 09/23/2011 | JOHN WILLIAMS | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES September 23, 2011 Thomas Sayler-Brown SBBL Architecture 1001 N. Alvernon Way Tucson, Arizona 85711 Subject: S11-044 HOUGHTON TOWN CENTER Tentative Plat/Development Plan Dear Thomas: Your submittal of September 6, 2011 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a set of 13 DETAILED cover letters explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLACKLINES MUST BE FOLDED 13 Copies Revised Plat (Fire, Assessor, HC Site, Addressing, Wastewater, Env Svcs, Engineering, Planning, Zoning, Landscape, TEP, Traffic, PDSD) 5 Copies Revised Landscape Plan (Engineering, Planning, Zoning, Landscape, PDSD) 2 Copies Revised Drainage Report (Engineering, PDSD) 1 Set Original Signature Assurance Package (PDSD) 1 Set Copy of Assurances Package (Engineering) 1 Check Made out to “Pima County Treasurer” for $200 (Wastewater) Should you have any questions, please call me at 837-4893. Sincerely, John Williams Planning Technician All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.tucsonaz.gov/dsd/ Via fax: 620-0535 |
| 09/23/2011 | JANE DUARTE | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved |