Plan Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Plan Number - S10-051
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 06/06/2011 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 06/13/2011 | ED ABRIGO | PIMA COUNTY | ASSESSOR | Passed | Since this is a Development Plan & not a Subdivision, the Assessor's Office has no comment on this. I send this over to our Land Section to keep them informed of new development. Thanks, Sherry Hyde Sr. Property Technician Pima County Assessor's Office (520)740-6629 |
| 06/13/2011 | JOSE ORTIZ | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | Approved per Zelin Canchola |
| 06/13/2011 | JENNIFER STEPHENS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Approved | AUDREY FARENGA ADDRESSING REVIEW PH #: 740-6800 FAX #: 623-5411 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: AUDREY FARENGA, ADDRESSING REVIEW SUBJECT: S10-051 WALGREENS/REVISED TENTATIVE PLAT DATE: June 10, 2011 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and we hereby approve this project. ***The Pima County Addressing Section can use digital CAD drawing files when submitted with your final plat Mylar. These CAD files can be submitted through Pima County Addressing. The digital CAD drawing files expedite the addressing and permitting processes when we are able to insert this digital data into the County’s Geographic Information System. Your support is greatly appreciated.*** |
| 06/22/2011 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | -CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: Walgreens Tentative Plat/Development Plan (2nd Review) S10-051 TRANSMITTAL DATE: June 22, 2011 DUE DATE: July 6, 2011 DEVELOPMENT PLAN COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development package. If, at the end of that time, the tentative plat/development plan has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this development plan is November 23, 2011. 2. This comment was not addressed. D.S. 2-03.2.2.B.5 & D.S. 2-05.2.2.B.3 Under General Note 2 remove "GENERAL MERCHANDISE SUBJECT TO SECTION 3.5.9.2c." as it is referenced under General Note 6. 3. D.S. 2-03.2.4.H &. D.S. 2-05.2.4.E GENERAL NOTE #47 states "PROPOPSED 15' WIDE R/W ADDITON BY FINAL PLAT BK_____, PG_____." Please clarify if this is a dedication of right-of-way. If this is a dedication provide documentation from COT Real Estate that the dedication has been approved and provide the recordation information, Sequence Number on the plan. 4. This comment was not fully addressed. Provide the recordation information for Silverbell Road on the plan. D.S. 2-05.2.3.C Label Silverbell Road as an "MS&R" and provide the recordation data. 5. D.S. 2-05.2.3.C Remove the "GATEWAY" reference from the plan as Silverbell is not listed on the MS&R Map as a Gateway Route. 6. This comment was not addressed. D.S. 2-05.2.4.D Provide a parking area access lane (PAAL) width dimension from what appears to be a concrete island, east of the drive-thru canopy, east to the curb. 7. Depending on how the above comments are addressed addition comments may be forth coming. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.com Sshield1 on DS1/planning/New Development Package/ S10-051 RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised tentative plat/development plan. |
| 06/24/2011 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Approved | PIMA COUNTY REGIONAL WASTEWATER RECLAMATION DEPARTMENT 201 NORTH STONE AVENUE TUCSON, ARIZONA 85701-1207 JACKSON JENKINS PH: (520) 740-6500 DIRECTOR FAX: (520) 620-0135 June 24, 2011 To: KELLY HAYES EVERGREEN DEVCO, INC. Thru: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager City of Tucson Development Services Department ____________________________________________ From: Tom Porter, Sr. CEA (520-740-6719), Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department Subject: WALGREENS Site Plan – 2nd Submittal S10-051 The Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department (PCRWRD) has reviewed the proposed sewer collection lines for the above-referenced project. The following comments are offered for your use: The Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department hereby approves the above referenced submittal of the development plan as submitted. cc: Chad Amateau, PE Checked by:_________ Kristin Greene, PE, DLU Manager DLU Project folder |
| 06/24/2011 | RONALD BROWN | ZONING HC | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 07/06/2011 | MPADILL1 | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Denied | PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT COMMENTS Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT S10-051 Walgreens at Silverbell and St. Mary's (X) Tentative Plat (X) Development Plan (X) Landscape Plan () Revised Plan/Plat () Board of Adjustment () Other - Elevations CROSS REFERENCE: C9-10-06, PA-10-02 NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Manzo Neighborhood Plan, Santa Cruz Area Plan GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: NO COMMENTS DUE BY: July 06, 2011 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: () No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment () Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions () RCP Proposal Complies with Plan Policies (X) See Additional Comments Attached () No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: (X) Resubmittal Required: (X) Tentative Plat (X) Development Plan (X) Landscape Plan (X) Other - Colored Elevations (all four sides) REVIEWER:msp 791-5505 DATE: 07/06/2011 Planning and Development Services Department Community Planning Section S10-051 - Walgreens at Silverbell Road and St. Mary's Road July 6, 2011 The site is zoned R-2. Prior to the request for a change of zoning, the applicant was required to amend the Manzo Neighborhood Plan to allow for commercial development of the subject site at the northeast corner of Silverbell Road and St. Mary's Road. On September 8, 2010, Mayor and Council adopted Resolution 21613 amending the Manzo Neighborhood Plan to allow Neighborhood Commercial/Office/Low and Medium Density Residential on the 3.77-acre site. Since then the site has been rezoned from R-2 to C-1 to allow for commercial uses. Based on the applicant's request, a concurrent review for both the Rezoning, C9-10-06 and Tentative Plat/Development plan, S10-051, is being conducted by staff. Prior to the approval of S10-051, it shall comply with any and all conditions approved through the Rezoning process. Therefore, the following revisions to the development plan, as outlined by staff are subject to the C9-10-06, rezoning conditions. Staff offers the following comments on issues identified on the first review, which needed to be corrected and have yet to be corrected: 1. Landscape Plan, Sheet 1, does not comply with rezoning condition # 17. In staff's previous review, as part of comment #3, the following was requested; At the northeast corner of the site provide a wider landscape area that includes trees. All landscaping to be provided at the time of the development of Lot 1. Please revise landscape plan to provide enhanced landscaping on the northeast area of Lot 2. There is a portion of the northeast area of Lot 2 that is not part of the future parking area and could be enhanced with additional landscaping, with trees and other dense landscape vegetation. Landscaping to be on a permanent irrigation system. 2. Prior to Mylar approval, an approved reciprocal easement agreement (vehicular, pedestrian, and bicycle) shall be provided for Lots 1 and 2, as part of a cross parking agreement with the recordation shown in the General Notes, Sheet DP-1. 3. Please revise development plan to comply with rezoning condition #8, which reads: All buildings for Lot 1 and future Lot 2 should be designed with "four-sided" architecture. Color elevations demonstrating compliance with this condition shall be submitted as part of the develop plan packet. Please provide color elevations, with dimensions, showing that the architectural detail for the rear and sides, is comparable to the front façade. 4. Please revise landscape plan, sheet 2, need to add to each wall elevation (Option A, B, C, & D), language to state that each option of screen wall is graffiti-resistant. 5. Please revise development plan, sheet 2 and landscape plan, sheet 1, to show a pedestrian pathway along Sivlerbell Road that meets the direction provided by Mr. Howard Dutt from the Department of Parks and Recreation. E-mail dated April 20, 2011, provide by Mr. Dutt, states the pedestrian path shall be a minimum of ten feet wide. Current submittal indicates an eight foot wide pedestrian path. 6. Please revise development plan and landscape plan to show wall along the north boundary to be in compliance with rezoning condition # 13. Requires landscape areas with trees along both sides of the wall. |
| 07/06/2011 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | J. Linville PDSD 07/01/11 1) Revise all plan sheets to include the CDRC Case number and the references for related cases. 2) Contact me regarding the location of the Silverbell Road Path. The setback from the roadway varies from the standard established in the PIma Regional Trail System Master Plan, which calls for a minimum 12' setback and a landscape buffer between the path and the road. |
| 07/06/2011 | JASON GREEN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: July 6, 2011 SUBJECT: Walgreens- Development Plan/Tentative Plat 2nd Engineering Review TO: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager LOCATION: 550 N Silverbell Road, T14S R13E Sec10 Ward 1 REVIEWERS: Jason Green, CFM ACTIVITY: S10-051 SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Planning Development Services Department has received the revised development plan/tentative plat and Drainage Report (Optimus Civil Design Group, 17NOV10). Engineering Division has reviewed the submitted development plan/tentative plat and does not recommend approval at this time. The following items need to be addressed: DRAINAGE REPORT: 1) Completed. 2) Completed. 3) Completed. 4) Completed. DEVELOPMENT PLAN: The proposed project falls under both Tentative Plat (DS Sec.2-03) and Development Plan (DS Sec.2-05) requirements. The project is showing a lot split via the Tentative Plat process, but is also showing the development of the property, which is in essence a Development Plan review. The project was reviewed for conformance with the content requirements under DS 2-03 and 2-05. 1) Completed. 2) Acknowledged: DS Sec.2-05.2.2.B.7: Revise the plan set to include the missing information under General Note # 20 once the Rezoning request is approved. 3) Completed. 4) Completed. 5) Completed. 6) Completed. 7) Completed. 8) Acknowledged: DS Sec.11-01.8.1: Written justification based on engineering / technical reasons has been submitted for review and Engineering Section concurs with the justification submitted. Verify that all mitigation measures are addressed, specifically the increased landscaping setback, enhancement of landscaping and the construction of the wall along the property lines. Revise the landscaping sheet to include specific linear feet dimensions for each section of the proposed wall per the landscape plan and detail 5 on Sheet 2 of 8. 9) Completed. 10) Acknowledged. 11) Completed. 12) Completed. 13) Restated: DS Sec.2-05.2.4.D.4: Provide a copy of the referenced REA under the comment letter. Per the engineering response letter a REA was supposed to be attached however a copy of it could not be located in the CDRC submittal package or in the CDRC file. 14) Completed. 15) Acknowledged. 16) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.H: Revise the plan set, in conjunction with the submitted Drainage Report, to reflect the following information. For additional information regarding drainage standards, see the City of Tucson Standards Manual for Drainage Design and Floodplain Management (10-02) or the Detention/Retention Manual (10-01). a) Acknowledged: However the landscape plan must be revised to exclude the proposed tree at the entrance to the basin access ramp. Also provide a Keynote or detail for the required curb cut (with bollards to prevent access) at the basin ramp location. b) Acknowledged: However due to a redesign and addition of the storm drain the detail A/DP-4 needs to be revised to label the proposed 18" HDPE under the PAAL. Provide pipe size, depth of cover, slope, etc for design verification. c) Completed. d) Completed. e) Completed. f) Acknowledged. g) Acknowledged. h) Acknowledged. 17) Acknowledged: DS Sec.2-05.2.4.K: Revise the site plan so that the proposed sidewalk that connects the proposed development to the existing subdivision is constructed out of the required material. Per the Development Standards and Standard Details for Public Improvement a sidewalk must be constructed out of concrete not the referenced asphalt as shown in Keynote #6. 18) Acknowledged. 19) Completed. 20) Completed. 21) Acknowledged. 22) Completed. 23) Acknowledged: DS Sec.10-02.14.3.4: However revise the landscape plan to remove the proposed tree at the ramp access point. The 15-foot width for the access ramp must remain free from obstructions. Also a curb cut is required to allow access into the basin without having to drive over the 6-inch vertical curbing. Provide removable bollards and/or fencing with a gate to prevent unauthorized access. 24) Completed. 25) Completed. TENTATIVE PLAT COMMENTS: The proposed project falls under both Tentative Plat (DS Sec.2-03) and Development Plan (DS Sec.2-05) requirements. The project is showing a lot split via the Tentative Plat process, but is also showing the development of the property, which is in essence a Development Plan review. The project was reviewed for conformance with the content requirements under DS 2-03 and 2-05. 26) Completed. 27) Completed. 28) Completed. 29) Completed. 30) Completed. 31) Completed. 32) Completed. 33) Completed. 34) Completed. 35) Acknowledged. 36) Completed. 37) Acknowledged. 38) DS Sec.2-03.2.4.F: Revise cross section B-B on Sheet DP-4 to reflect the proposed underground active water harvesting system. Provide the minimum depth of cover over the proposed system and provide all manufactures installation, details, and maintenance requirements for verification purposes. 39) Acknowledged: DS Sec.2-03.2.4.H: However the recordation information is required for the proposed dedication. If the dedication is to be done by final plat, provide a temporary letter or email from Real Estate for the conditional approval and list any conditions that may apply. 40) Completed. 41) Acknowledged. 42) Completed. GEOTECHICAL REPORT: 43) Completed. GRADING PLAN: 44) DS Sec.11-01.2.1: For future references a grading permit application will be required for this project. A grading permit may not be issued prior to Development Plan/Tentative Plat approval. 45) Please ensure the grading plan is consistent with the Development Plan/Tentative Plat, Drainage Report, and Geotechnical Report. Grading standards may be accessed at: http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/DevStandsTOC.pdf. 46) Arizona Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (AZPDES) requirements are applicable to this project. A Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan and text addressing stormwater controls for all areas affected by construction activities related to this development will be required with grading plan submittal. For further information, visit: www.adeq.state.az.us/environ/water/permits/stormwater.html. GENERAL COMMENTS: Please provide a revised Development Plan/Tentative Plat, Drainage Report and Geotechnical Report that addresses the comments provided above. Include a comprehensive response letter addressing in detail responses to all of the above comments. For any questions or to schedule meetings call me at 837-4929. Jason Green, CFM Senior Engineer Associate Engineering Division Planning & Development Services |
| 07/07/2011 | FRODRIG2 | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Approved | Date Case Number Project Address June 8, 2011 S10-051 WALGREENS Development Plan / TENTATIVE PLAT Comments: The proposed Development Plan for the WALGREENS, TENTATIVE PLAT Case No.S10-051. meets the minimum requirements for the Environmental Services, Solid Waste and Recycle materials disposal Standard 6-01, and is hereby approved by Environmental Services. Environmental Services Department Development Plan Review Reviewer: Tony Teran Office Phone (520) 837-3706 E-mail: Tony.Teran @tucsonaz.gov |
| 07/08/2011 | JANE DUARTE | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Denied | Comments are based on applicable standards and agreements and clarified in the email correspondence from Howard Dutt of Parks and Recreation to Rick Schoenfeld in an April 20, 2011 email. 1) Revise the plans as necessary to clarify that the minimum width of the Silverbell Rd. Path is to be ten feet. 2) Sheet DP-2 still seems to indicate that the sidewalk from the corner of St Marys Rd north to the deceleration lane is to be left in place, contrary to what is requested above. (See April 20 email) 3) Excerpt from April 20 email: "Transportation's irrigation system on this parcel is currently inoperative. Transportation will require that the property owner add more trees in the right of way and that the property's irrigation system be used to water them. Furthermore, it should be noted on your plan that maintenance of these improvements in the right-of-way are the responsibility of the property owner." Add additional trees and landscaping to the right of way on both sides of the Silverbell Path. 4) Revise the plans to include the Standards Note for ROW Planting: 1. It is the owners responsibility to keep the Sight Visibility Triangles (SVT), and the pedestrian access area clear of vegetation at all times, per Land Use Code (LUC) section 2. Final plant locations must be in compliance with all utility setback requirements. 3. The owner understands that if the City of Tucson Transportation Department or any utility company needs to work within the ROW in the landscaped area, plants and irrigation may be destroyed without replacement or repair. 4. The owner takes full liability for this landscape and irrigation, and any damage to roadway, sidewalk and utilities. 5. The only private irrigation equipment that is allowed within the ROW is polyethylene type tubing and emitters that are not under constant pressure. All other equipment must be on private property. (excluding water meter) |
| 07/11/2011 | JOHN WILLIAMS | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES July 25, 2011 Kelly Hayes Evergreen Devco, Inc. 2390 E. Camelback Rd. # 410 Tucson, Arizona 85016 Subject: S10-051 WALGREENS Tentative Plat Dear Kelly: Your submittal of November 24, 2010 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a set of 6 DETAILED cover letters explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLACKLINES MUST BE FOLDED 6 Copies Revised Tentative Plat (Zoning, Planning, Engineering, Landscape, Parks & Rec, PDSD) 6 Copies Revised Landscape Plan (Zoning, Planning, Engineering, Landscape, Parks & Rec, PDSD) 2 Copies REA Documentation (Engineering, PDSD) 2 Copies Color Elevations (Planning, PDSD) 2 Copies Revised Drainage Report (Engineering, PDSD) 2 Copies Geotechnical Report (Engineering, PDSD) 3 Copies Silverbell Rd. Recordation Documentation (Zoning, Engineering, PDSD) Should you have any questions, please call me at (520) 837-4893. Sincerely, John Williams Planning Technician All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.tucsonaz.gov/dsd/ Via fax: (602) 808-8600 |