Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Plan Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Plan Number - S10-051
Review Name: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/04/2011 | JOSE ORTIZ | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Denied | Compliance with the Pima County Trails System Master Plan is required for this site. Affected segment: Silverbell Road Path (P024) The proposed Silverbell Road Path follows Silverbell Road from Congress Street on the south to Twin Peaks Road on the north. It intersects or passes several features including: a backcountry trail just north of Speedway Boulevard, Trails End Wash Backcountry Trail, Christopher Columbus Park, Roger Wash Backcountry Trail, Sweetwater Wash Backcountry Trail, a backcountry trail on El Camino del Cerro, West Idle Hour Wash Backcountry Trail, Belmont Road Backcountry Trail, Wild Horse Wash Backcountry Trail, Cortaro Farms Road Path, Picture Rocks Wash Backcountry Trail, Scenic Drive Backcountry Trail, and Twin Peaks Road Backcountry Trail. Construction of the Silverbell Road Path is required adjacent to the site by the developer in the manner and location prescribed by the Pima County Trails System Master Plan, according to the standards of the Tucson Department of Transportation. Revise all plans as necessary. |
| 01/04/2011 | JOHN WILLIAMS | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES January 4, 2011 Kelly Hayes Evergreen Devco, Inc. 2390 E. Camelback Rd. #410 Phoenix, Arizona 85016 Subject: S10-051 WALGREENS Tentative Plat Dear Kelly: Your submittal of November 24, 2010 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a set of 12 DETAILED cover letters explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLACKLINES MUST BE FOLDED 12 Copies Revised TP/DP (Assessor, HC Site, Engineering, Addressing, Zoning, Env Svcs, Wastewater, Planning, Landscape, Traffic, Parks & Rec, PDSD) 5 Copies Revised Landscape Plan (Engineering, Zoning, Planning, Landscape, PDSD) 2 Copies Revised NPPO Plan (Landscape, PDSD) 2 Copies Traffic Impact Analysis (Traffic, PDSD) 2 Copies Revised Geotechnical Report (Engineering, PDSD) 2 Copies Revised Drainage Report (Engineering, PDSD) 2 Copies Four Sided Full Color Building Elevations (Planning, PDSD) 2 Copies Recorded Cross Access/Cross Parking Agreements (Planning, PDSD) 2 CD's All Reports and Plans. Reports may be PDF format; The Plans must be 300dpi single page Tiff's. (PDSD) 1 Check Made out to "Pima County Treasurer" for $50.00 (Wastewater) Should you have any questions, please call me at (520) 837-4893. Sincerely, John Williams Planning Technician All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.tucsonaz.gov/dsd/ Via fax: (602) 808-9100 |
| 01/04/2011 | JOSE ORTIZ | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Denied | January 4, 2011 ACTIVITY NUMBER: D10-051 PROJECT NAME: Walgreens PROJECT ADDRESS: Silverbell/St Mary's PROJECT REVIEWER: Jose E. Ortiz PE, Traffic Engineer Resubmittal Required: Traffic Engineering does not recommend approval of the Development Plan; therefore a revised Development Plan is required for re-submittal. The following items must be revised or added to the development plan. Include a response letter with the next submittal that states how all comments have been addressed. 1. Illustrate on the plans the existing and future Right of Way as depicted on the Major Sheets and Routes Map. Callout the 75' half right of way on the plans as future right of way. 2. The access point shall have 25' radius curb returns. (DS 3-01.0 figure 6) 3. Remove from the plans the proposed crosswalk across the driveway. 4. Coordinate with Joe Linville of PDSD and Tom Thivener of TDOT regarding the construction of the Silverbell Road Path within city right of way. 5. Tucson City Code Chapter 25 Section 38 states that the maximum driveway width is 30'. Justify the proposed 40' opening. 6. Provide a copy of the prepared Traffic Impact Analysis or traffic statement during the next submittal. 7. A private improvement agreement (PIA) will be necessary for the proposed work to be performed within the Right-of-way. An approved development plan is required prior to applying for a PIA. Contact the PIA Coordinator for additional PIA information at 791-5550 ext. 1107. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 837-6730 or Jose.Ortiz@tucsonaz.gov |
| 11/24/2010 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 11/24/2010 | RONALD BROWN | ADA | REVIEW | Passed | Not a COT owned and/or operated project |
| 11/24/2010 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | COT NON-DSD | REAL ESTATE | Passed | Compliance with the Pima County Trails System Master Plan is required for this site. Affected segment: Silverbell Road Path (P024) The proposed Silverbell Road Path follows Silverbell Road from Congress Street on the south to Twin Peaks Road on the north. It intersects or passes several features including: a backcountry trail just north of Speedway Boulevard, Trails End Wash Backcountry Trail, Christopher Columbus Park, Roger Wash Backcountry Trail, Sweetwater Wash Backcountry Trail, a backcountry trail on El Camino del Cerro, West Idle Hour Wash Backcountry Trail, Belmont Road Backcountry Trail, Wild Horse Wash Backcountry Trail, Cortaro Farms Road Path, Picture Rocks Wash Backcountry Trail, Scenic Drive Backcountry Trail, and Twin Peaks Road Backcountry Trail. Construction of the Silverbell Road Path is required adjacent to the site by the developer in the manner and location prescribed by the Pima County Trails System Master Plan, according to the standards of the Tucson Department of Transportation. Revise all plans as necessary. |
| 11/29/2010 | ED ABRIGO | PIMA COUNTY | ASSESSOR | Approv-Cond | Office of the Pima County Assessor 115 N. Church Ave. Tucson, Arizona 85701 BILL STAPLES ASSESSOR TO: CDRC Office Subdivision Review City of Tucson (FAX# 791-5559) FROM: Sherry Hyde Senior Property Technician Pima County Assessor’s Office DATE: 11/29/10 RE: Assessor’s Review and Comments Regarding S10-051 WALGREENS * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * X Plat meets Assessor’s Office requirements. _______ Plat does not meet Assessor’s Office requirements. COMMENTS: THE TITLE BLOCK IN THE LOWER RIGHT HAND CORNER MUST HAVE THE NUMBER OF LOTS OR UNITS OR BLOCKS OR ANY COMBINATION OF THESE. IT MUST HAVE THE COMMON AREA LISTED, IF THERE ARE ANY. THERE MUST BE A SECTION TIE, WITH A BEARING AND DIMENSION FROM THE SECTION CORNER OR QUARTER CORNER TO THE POINT OF TIE ON THE SUBDIVISION. THE PERIMETER LINE MUST BE SOLID AND THE HEAVIEST LINEWEIGHT ON THE PLAT. THE LOT LINES AND COMMON AREA LINES MUST BE SOLID AND THE NEXT HEAVIEST. LINES FOR EROSION SETBACKS, FLOODPLAIN LINES ETC. SHOULD BE THE LIGHTEST LINEWEIGHT AND BE DASHED OR DOT-DASHED. THERE MUST BE BEARINGS AND DIMENSIONS FOR THE PERIMETER AND ALL LOT LINES AND ALL COMMON AREAS. ALL LOTS MUST BE NUMBERED AND HAVE SQUARE FOOTAGE. ALL HATCHING, STIPPLING, STRIPING ETC. MUST BE REMOVED IN THE FINAL PLAT, UNLESS ANOTHER AGENCY REQUIRES IT. IF SO, ALL LETTERING MUST HAVE THE HATCHING, ETC. CUT AWAY SO THEY ARE LEGIBLE. NOTE: THE ASSESSOR’S CURRENT INVOLVEMENT IN PROCESSING ITS MANUAL MAPS TO DIGITAL FORMAT IS EXPEDITED GREATLY BY EXCHANGE OF DIGITAL DATA. IN THE COURSE OF RECORDING THIS SUBDIVISION YOUR ASSISTANCE IN PROVIDING THIS OFFICE WITH AN AUTOCAD COPY WOULD BE GREATLY APPRECIATED. THANK YOU FOR ANY DIGITAL DATA PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED. |
| 11/29/2010 | DAVID MANN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | Compliance with the Pima County Trails System Master Plan is required for this site. Affected segment: Silverbell Road Path (P024) The proposed Silverbell Road Path follows Silverbell Road from Congress Street on the south to Twin Peaks Road on the north. It intersects or passes several features including: a backcountry trail just north of Speedway Boulevard, Trails End Wash Backcountry Trail, Christopher Columbus Park, Roger Wash Backcountry Trail, Sweetwater Wash Backcountry Trail, a backcountry trail on El Camino del Cerro, West Idle Hour Wash Backcountry Trail, Belmont Road Backcountry Trail, Wild Horse Wash Backcountry Trail, Cortaro Farms Road Path, Picture Rocks Wash Backcountry Trail, Scenic Drive Backcountry Trail, and Twin Peaks Road Backcountry Trail. Construction of the Silverbell Road Path is required adjacent to the site by the developer in the manner and location prescribed by the Pima County Trails System Master Plan, according to the standards of the Tucson Department of Transportation. Revise all plans as necessary. |
| 12/02/2010 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | COT NON-DSD | TUCSON POLICE DEPARTMENT | Approved | Compliance with the Pima County Trails System Master Plan is required for this site. Affected segment: Silverbell Road Path (P024) The proposed Silverbell Road Path follows Silverbell Road from Congress Street on the south to Twin Peaks Road on the north. It intersects or passes several features including: a backcountry trail just north of Speedway Boulevard, Trails End Wash Backcountry Trail, Christopher Columbus Park, Roger Wash Backcountry Trail, Sweetwater Wash Backcountry Trail, a backcountry trail on El Camino del Cerro, West Idle Hour Wash Backcountry Trail, Belmont Road Backcountry Trail, Wild Horse Wash Backcountry Trail, Cortaro Farms Road Path, Picture Rocks Wash Backcountry Trail, Scenic Drive Backcountry Trail, and Twin Peaks Road Backcountry Trail. Construction of the Silverbell Road Path is required adjacent to the site by the developer in the manner and location prescribed by the Pima County Trails System Master Plan, according to the standards of the Tucson Department of Transportation. Revise all plans as necessary. |
| 12/02/2010 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | COT NON-DSD | TUCSON POLICE DEPARTMENT | Approved | I have no objections to this request. CSO Becky Noel #37968 Tucson Police Dept 837-7428 |
| 12/06/2010 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Approved | >>> Douglas Kratina <DKratina@azdot.gov> 11/30/2010 11:25 AM >>> Regional Traffic Engineering has no comment on this submittal and recommends approval of this development. It will have no affect on any existing ADOT facilities. Thank you. |
| 12/16/2010 | RONALD BROWN | ZONING HC | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Detectable warnings are not required at the accessible parking aisles. 2. The detectable warning strip at the front entrance to the store is not required. The bollards are acceptable by Development Standards (reference Zoning comments) as an approved method of separation between the PAAL and the accessible route. 3. At the marked crossing at the front entrance to the store: a. Straighten out the stripped pathway; make it direct and as close as possible 90 degrees from the curb line. b. Provide a detectable warning strip as wide as the marked crossing at the front entrance curb line. 4. Note 9 references a curb ramp detail 9/DP-3 which is a bollard detail. Please reconcile. END OF REVIEW |
| 12/20/2010 | JASON GREEN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: December 20, 2010 SUBJECT: Walgreens- Development Plan/Tentative Plat Engineering Review TO: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager LOCATION: 550 N Silverbell Road, T14S R13E Sec10 Ward 1 REVIEWERS: Jason Green, CFM ACTIVITY: S10-051 SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Planning Development Services Department has received the proposed development plan/tentative plat and Drainage Report (Optimus Civil Design Group, 17NOV10). Engineering Division has reviewed the submitted development plan/tentative plat and does not recommend approval at this time. The following items need to be addressed: DRAINAGE REPORT: 1) The Hydrologic data sheets are acceptable for this project only. In the future the City of Tucson requires a 3-inch value for the rainfall depths on a 100-year return period. The NOAA Atlas 14 (90% UCL) data used under the County's Flood Peak Procedure software is only acceptable within the County jurisdiction. 2) Revise the Drainage Report to provide a discussion with associated details for all proposed drainage infrastructure. The basin outlet and all associated details must be discussed within the Drainage Report in order for the plan set to accurately show what needs to be constructed. This is to include the minimum type of pipe required within the Public right-of-way, the proposed headwalls, rock rip rap erosion protection, invert elevations for all storm drains and catch basins, specific detail or minimum manufacture type for the check valve, basin access ramp, all associated details and drainage design for the proposed under ground active water harvesting system, etc. 3) Provide a discussion within the Drainage Report to include conformance with the Commercial Rainwater Harvesting Ordinance and the proposed active water harvesting design to verify it meets all requirements within the Ordinance. Example, the outlet of the overflow discharge pipe must be designed to prevent erosion of the channel slope. 4) DS Sec.2-03.2.4.K: A Geotechnical Report is required for this project due to the overall design. The soils report needs to discuss suitability and feasibility of the project and must provide specific discussion with recommendations for the proposed detention/retention basin, drainage channel and the underground active water harvesting system within the vehicular use area. Description of existing soil constraints for the site, structural design recommendations, and other typical geotechnical data is needed. The soil report shall provide identification / assessment of any potentially hazardous geotechnical areas. Recommendations need to be incorporated into the Development Plan/Tentative Plat and Drainage Report. DEVELOPMENT PLAN: The proposed project falls under both Tentative Plat (DS Sec.2-03) and Development Plan (DS Sec.2-05) requirements. The project is showing a lot split via the Tentative Plat process, but is also showing the development of the property, which is in essence a Development Plan review. The project was reviewed for conformance with the content requirements under DS 2-03 and 2-05. 1) DS Sec.2-05.2.1.K: Provide on the Development Plan/Tentative Plat the subdivision case #S10-051 and the rezoning #C9-10-06 in the lower right hand corner of all plan sheets. 2) DS Sec.2-05.2.2.B.7: Revise the plan set to list the conditions of rezoning and to include the missing information under General Note # 20 once the Rezoning request is approved. 3) DS Sec.2-05.2.2.B.11: Clarify General Note #1 and the acreage differences between the Entire Site and Walgreen's. Provide Gross acreage of the entire site plus the gross acreage of both proposed lots (1 and 2). 4) DS Sec.2-03.2.3.C: Revise the plan set to include the dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts and sidewalks on Sheet DP-2. 5) DS Sec.2-03.2.3.C: Revise the plan set to label Silverbell Road as a Public/ MS&R/ Gateway street. 6) DS Sec.2-03.2.3.F: Revise the plan set to clearly label the improvement plan number for all existing storm drainage facilities that are shown adjacent to the site (Keynote #26). 7) DS Sec.2-03.2.3.H: Revise the plan set to include conditions on adjacent land due to the differential grading requirement and proposed conditions. Provide the approximate direction and gradients of ground slope; character and location of adjacent development; and their existing conditions. 8) DS Sec.11-01.8.1: Revise the plan set to clearly show that it meets differential grading requirements. Placement of fill in excess of 2-feet (or a finished floor elevation in excess of 2-feet plus slab thickness) above existing grade at any location in the outer 100-feet of the developing site must meet the requirements within DS Sec.11-01.8.1.A. Fill and pad grades shall be changed to meet two-foot differential limit, otherwise the procedures for differential grading outlined in this section shall apply and written justification based on engineering / technical reasons shall be submitted as first step in the procedure. 9) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.A: Revise the plan set to include the approximate square footage of each proposed lots. Refer to Tentative Plat comments for further information. 10) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.C: Revise the plan set to clearly show that each phase of the proposed project phasing complies with all requirements as a separate entity. Show and label any temporary improvements that will be needed to make the site function for each phase. All improvements that are offsite of the phase under construction are required to provide a temporary easement or other legal documentation to assure legal use of the property. Examples are a portion of the vehicular use area is constructed on Lot 2 that services Lot 1 and provide how the drainage from Lot 2 (pre-developed conditions) will be accepted into Lot 1 due to the overall drainage design of the project. 11) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.D.1: Refer to Tucson Department of Transportation comments for right-of-way improvements. Clearly label the required minimum 25-foot curb return for the PAAL entrance from Silverbell Road. For further information contact the Tucson Department of Transportation, Jose Ortiz, P.E. at 837-6730. 12) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.D.1: Revise the plan set to show the maximum curb cut width for the PAAL entrance off Silverbell as 35 feet per Section 25-39 of the Tucson Code. Approval from TDOT will be required for a larger PAAL width as shown (40-feet). For further information contact the Tucson Department of Transportation, Jose Ortiz, P.E. at 837-6730. 13) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.D.4: Provide documentation to ensure legal access to Phase II for future development. Provide a cross-access easement agreement that is required for the proposed future PAAL and vehicular use area for Lot 2. If private easements are utilized protective covenants establishing the right of access and incorporation of future phases into the project are required. 14) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.E: Revise the plan set to show all right-of-way dedication on or abutting the site for Silverbell Road. Verify through City of Tucson Transportation if street dedication in accordance with the MS&R Plan will be required due the development plan being prepared in conjunction with a subdivision plat and rezoning request. 15) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.G: Provide all proposed easements (utility, drainage, access, etc) on the plan set, dimensioned and labeled as to their purpose and whether the will be private or public. Due to the phasing of the proposed drainage and detention/retention design Lot 2 is required to drain its run off into the proposed drainage channel and basin onto Lot 1. An easement will be required to verify that Lot 2 as legal access for future drainage and maintenance. 16) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.H: Revise the plan set, in conjunction with the submitted Drainage Report, to reflect the following information. For additional information regarding drainage standards, see the City of Tucson Standards Manual for Drainage Design and Floodplain Management (10-02) or the Detention/Retention Manual (10-01). a) Provide additional construction details for the proposed detention/retention basin. Specifically provide a detail for the basin outlet, minimum required pipe type (RCP), maintenance access ramp, etc. It is recommended that the detail or Keynote #35 provide the dimension for the cut off wall as required in Note 2 of PC/COT STD Detail 313. b) Revise the plan set to provide a detail for the proposed 2-12-inch pipe culverts under the pedestrian access to the adjacent subdivision. Verify pipe type, side slope, cover, length, safety railing, etc. c) Revise the plan set to provide invert elevations for all proposed storm drains and catch basins (Keynote #28). Provide the inlet and outlet invert elevations to verify slope due to the proposed project being elevated with fill in order to drain it up slope. d) Revise the plan set and Keynote #39 to provide a label for the proposed 18-inch storm drains. Specifically, the portion of the 18-inch storm drain within the public right of way is required to be at a minimum reinforced concrete (the proposed 18-inch diameter is also the minimum accepted size). e) Revise the plan set to label all proposed curb cuts into the landscaping area within the vehicular sue area. Per the landscape plan there are 4 additional curb cut locations that are not label or keynoted on the plan set, revise. f) Revise the plan set to clarify the design of the under ground active water harvesting system. Specifically clarify where Detail 1 as shown on Sheet 6 of 7 is in plan view. Clarify that the system can be maintained per the Manufactures Guidelines. At 55-feet verify if a manhole for access is not required per building code safety requirements. All recommendations within the Geotechnical Report must be shown on the plan set and associated details. g) Revise the plan set to provide erosion protection at the outlet to the proposed over flow pipe from the active water harvesting system in to the drainage channel. h) It is recommended that a detail be provided for the proposed connection into the existing storm drain manhole. If the detail is provided with the plan set it will facilitate for a quicker review under the grading plan application. 17) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.K: Refer to comments from Ron Brown, RA Structural Plans Examiner for any handicap accessibility comments that may be associated with this project. Be advised that the buildings on Lot 1 and Lot 2 will have to be connected with a pedestrian sidewalk and the building on Lot 2 will also be required to have pedestrian access to Silverbell Road. 18) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.L: Revise the plan set and any associated cross section/details to label and dimension the required 6-foot wide sidewalk along the entire frontage of Silverbell Road for both phases. Per the adopted Mayor and Counsel policy all sidewalks along MS&R right-of-ways for arterial and collector streets require 6-foot wide sidewalks. All sidewalks must comply with ADA accessibility requirements. If an existing 4-5 foot sidewalk is already constructed along the frontages provide photo documentation showing that the existing sidewalk is in good condition. If the sidewalk is missing in spots or is cracked and buckled a new 6-foot sidewalk will be required. A DSMR will be required for modifying the development standards to allow the existing sidewalk, if less than the minimum 6-foot required, to remain. The DSMR must be approved prior to Development Plan/Tentative Plat approval. All exhibits and discussion must reflect any changes made by the approved DSMR. Provide a General Note to list the DSMR number, the Development Standard being modified along with the date of DSMR approval. 19) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.L: Revise the plan set to clearly show the required handicap access ramp along both side of the proposed PAAL entrance. The north side will be required to have a new handicap ramp installed due to the required 6-foot sidewalk along the frontage. If a DSMR is obtained to keep a portion of the existing sidewalk then the ramp may need to be replaced if it does not meet TDOT standards. 20) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.P: Provide a detail for all proposed parking spaces. A typical parking space detail shall be provided refer to DS Sec.3-05 for design criteria for parking spaces and access. 21) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.T: Revise the plan set to provide a detail with dimensions for both refuse containers; the enclosures must have a minimum inside clear dimension of 10 feet by 10 feet between the steel bollards that are required between the container and the enclosure's rear and sidewall. The inside clear dimensions must be shown from the face of the wall protectors. Refer to DS Sec.6-01.4.2 for specifications and requirements on access, placement of containers, bin enclosure and construction. 22) DS Sec.10-02.14.3.2: Provide a note on the plan set stating, "(a) the owner or owners shall be solely responsible for operation, maintenance, and liability for drainage structures and detention basins; (b) that the owner or owners shall have an Arizona Registered Professional Civil Engineer prepare a certified inspection report for the drainage and detention/retention facilities at lease once each year, and that these regular inspection reports will be on file with the owner for review by City staff, upon written request; (c) that City staff may periodically inspect the drainage and retention/detention facilities to verify that scheduled and unscheduled maintenance activities are being performed adequately; and (d) that the owner or owners agree to reimburse the City for any and all costs associated with the maintaining of the drainage and detention/retention facilities, should the City find the owner or owners deficient in their obligation to adequately operate and maintain their facilities." 23) DS Sec.10-02.14.3.4: Revise the plan set to label and dimension the required basin access ramp. Verify that the ramp meets the minimum width and slope requirement of 15-feet and 15%, respectively. Alternate means of access will be reviewed by the City Engineer on a case-by-case basis. 24) DS Sec.11-01.2.1: Provide estimated cut and fill quantities on the plan set for grading plan purposes. 25) DS Sec.11-01.9: Revise the plan set and all proposed cross sections at property boundaries to verify that the required 2-feet setback from property lines to the proposed limits of grading and proposed fill slopes have been met. Provide sufficient room to allow for the 2-feet setback from property lines to top of and toe of fill slopes. Verify that any proposed walls are built completely onsite. No wall or wall footer is to extend past the property line, verify. TENTATIVE PLAT COMMENTS: The proposed project falls under both Tentative Plat (DS Sec.2-03) and Development Plan (DS Sec.2-05) requirements. The project is showing a lot split via the Tentative Plat process, but is also showing the development of the property, which is in essence a Development Plan review. The project was reviewed for conformance with the content requirements under DS 2-03 and 2-05. 26) DS Sec.2-03.2.1.D.2: Revise the project location map on Sheet DP-1 to identify conditions within the square mile shown, such as subdivisions adjacent to the site. Reference recorded subdivision plats by book and page numbers. 27) DS 2-03.2.1.G.2: Revise the title block on the plan set to show the proposed number of lots. 28) DS Sec.2-03.2.2.B.4: Revise the plan set to add a General Note stating the following: "The number of lots is 2" 29) DS Sec.2-03.2.3.A: Revise the plan set to show the proposed location and type of subdivision control monuments that must be shown at the proposed lot corners. All monuments found or set will be described. 30) DS Sec.2-03.2.3.B: Revise the plan set and Basis of Bearing Section so that the statement is referenced to a found, readily locatable monument, i.e. reference a record of survey or recorded plat or fully describe 2 established monuments and show them on the plan set. 31) DS Sec.2-03.2.3.C: Revise the plan set to include all existing easements labeled with recordation information. A Title Report was not submitted with this project so existing easements within the Schedule B could not be verified, provide. 32) DS Sec.2-03.2.3.G: Revise the plan set to provide the improvement plan number for all existing drainage infrastructure, i.e. storm drain and box culvert (Keynote #26). 33) DS Sec.2-03.2.4.A: Revise the plan set to clearly show all proposed lot lines with approximate distances and measurements for the 2 lots that are being created by this plat. It appears that some of the dimensions are missing for the proposed lot 2. 34) DS Sec.2-03.2.4.B: Revise the plan set include the approximate square footage of each lot or a note stating that all lots comply with the minimum lot size requirements. 35) DS Sec.2-03.2.4.C: Revise the plan set to show the proposed PAALs, drainage channels, storm drains and detention/retention basin are located within a common area or within separate easements. All PAALs, drainage channels, storm drains and the detention/retention basin must have separate restrictions, a separate lot owners association or other common area that specifies responsibility and maintenance of the common used areas. Verify that the documents submitted provide for maintenance responsibility for all common areas and the detention/retention basin. 36) DS Sec.2-03.2.4.E: Revise the plan set to provide for the future phasing of the project. Refer to the Development Plan comment. 37) DS Sec.2-03.2.4.F: Revise the plan set to label and dimension the required cross access agreement, with recordation information, between the proposed 2 parcels. Or provide access easements that are delineated and dedicated for such use. 38) DS Sec.2-03.2.4.F: Revise cross section B-B on Sheet DP-4 to reflect the proposed underground active water harvesting system. Provide the minimum depth of cover over the proposed system and provide all manufactures installation, details, and maintenance requirements for verification purposes. 39) DS Sec.2-03.2.4.H: Verify if street dedication in accordance with the Major Streets and Routes Plan will be required by COT Real Property or TDOT at this time. 40) DS Sec.2-03.2.4.J: Provide all proposed easements (utility, drainage, access, etc) on the plan set, dimensioned and labeled as to their purpose and whether the will be private or public. Due to the phasing of the proposed drainage and detention/retention design Lot 2 is required to drain its run off into the proposed drainage channel and basin onto Lot 1. An easement will be required to verify that Lot 2 as legal access for future drainage and maintenance. 41) DS Sec.2-03.2.4.K: A Geotechnical Report is required for this project to discuss the suitability of the project site. The soils report needs to discuss suitability and feasibility of the project. Besides description of existing soil constraints for the site, structural design recommendations, pavement design section, design requirements for the underground active water harvesting system other typical geotechnical data is needed. The soils report shall provide identification / assessment of any potentially hazardous geotechnical areas, provide proposed recommendations for setbacks from building to drainage areas include minimum distance from foundations to drainage channels, detention/retention basin design, and provide infiltration test results. The geotechnical report shall specifically address all criteria listed in this section. See last sentence of this section for items 6 (c) & (d) regarding hydro-collapsing soils and 30-foot test boring for basin design. Recommendations need to be incorporated into the plan set and Drainage Report. The soils report needs to discuss suitability and feasibility of the project and must provide specific discussion with recommendations for the proposed underground water harvesting system 42) DS Sec.6-01: Refer to Environmental Services comments for all refuse containers locations and detail corrections and maneuverability for refuse vehicles. GEOTECHICAL REPORT: 43) DS Sec.10-02.14.2.6: A geotechnical evaluation needs to be submitted for review. The soils report needs to discuss suitability and feasibility of the project and must provide specific discussion with recommendations for the proposed underground water harvesting system under the vehicular use area. The report must also address the following: a) Soils report should provide conformance with DS section 10-02.14.2.6 regarding 30-foot boring for the proposed detention/retention basin, and provide discussion of potential for hydro-collapsible soils and any recommendation for setbacks from building to proposed basin. b) The soils report shall provide identification / assessment of any potentially hazardous geotechnical areas, and state any geotechnical recommendations and whether there are special provisions for the soil preparation for this development. Specifically pavement structure design over the underground water harvesting system. c) Provide slope stability recommendations for any proposed constructed slopes. d) Provide pavement structure design recommendations for all of the vehicular use area. Must provide a discussion on the proposed water harvesting system under the loading zone and vehicular use area. e) Provide infiltration rates for the detention/retention basin to assure the drain down time is within the required time limit of 12-hours. GRADING PLAN: 44) DS Sec.11-01.2.1: For future references a grading permit application will be required for this project. A grading permit may not be issued prior to Development Plan/Tentative Plat approval. 45) Please ensure the grading plan is consistent with the Development Plan/Tentative Plat, Drainage Report, and Geotechnical Report. Grading standards may be accessed at: http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/DevStandsTOC.pdf. 46) Arizona Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (AZPDES) requirements are applicable to this project. A Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan and text addressing stormwater controls for all areas affected by construction activities related to this development will be required with grading plan submittal. For further information, visit: www.adeq.state.az.us/environ/water/permits/stormwater.html. GENERAL COMMENTS: Please provide a revised Development Plan/Tentative Plat, Drainage Report and Geotechnical Report that addresses the comments provided above. Include a comprehensive response letter addressing in detail responses to all of the above comments. Further comments may be generated upon resubmittal of the Development Plan/Tentative Plat, Drainage Report, and Geotechnical Report reviews. Additional comments may also be generated since the Rezoning Application has yet to be approved by all Departments and not all of the rezoning conditions are known at this time. For any questions or to schedule meetings call me at 837-4929. Jason Green, CFM Senior Engineer Associate Engineering Division Planning & Development Services |
| 12/21/2010 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Approv-Cond | 201 N. STONE AV., 2ND FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 AUDREY FARENGA ADDRESSING REVIEW PH #: 740-6800 FAX #: 623-5411 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: AUDREY FARENGA, ADDRESSING REVIEW SUBJECT: S10-051 WALGREENS AT NEC SILVERBELL RD AND ST MARYS RD/DEVELOPMENT PLAN/TENTATIVE PLAT DATE: December 21, 2010 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and we hereby approve this project. Note: On the final development plan change section 12 to 14 on the Location Map. Submit a 24 x 36 Reverse Reading Double Matte Photo Mylar of approved Development Plan to City Planning. Signed and dated Mylar will be forwarded to Pima County Addressing prior to assignment of addresses. All addresses will need to be displayed per Pima County Address Standards at the time of final inspection. |
| 12/22/2010 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: Walgreens Tentative Plat/Development Plan (1st Review) S10-051 TRANSMITTAL DATE: December 22, 2010 DUE DATE: December 27, 2010 DEVELOPMENT PLAN COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development package. If, at the end of that time, the tentative plat/development plan has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this development plan is November 23, 2011. 2. As the conditions of rezoning have not been provided additional comments may be forth coming. 3. D.S. 2-03.2.1.D.2 Identify all subdivisions plats by book and page number within the location map. 4. D.S. 2-03.2.1.D.3 & D.S. 2-05.2.1.D.3 The section corner call out "12", on the southeast corner of the location map is not correct. This section corner should be labeled as "14" 5. D.S. 2-03.2.1.G.2 The number of proposed lots is to be noted within the title block. 6. D.S. 2-03.2.2.B.1 & D.S. 2-05.2.2.B.8 Place the subdivision case number S10-051 and the rezoning case number C9-10-06 in the lower right corner of the plat next to the title block. 7. D.S. 2-03.2.2.B.3 & D.S. 2-05.2.2.B.2 List the rezoning conditions on the plat. 8. D.S. 2-03.2.2.B.4 Add the following note: "THE NUMBER OF LOTS IS 2." 9. D.S. 2-03.2.2.B.5 & D.S. 2-05.2.2.B.3 Under General Note 6 the development designator "31" is not correct. Per LUC Section 2.5.3.2.B.2 the correct development designator is "28" 10. D.S. 2-03.2.2.B.5 & D.S. 2-05.2.2.B.3 Under General Note Under General Note 6 the "SUBJECT TO: SEC. 3.5.9.2.A" is not correct. Per LUC Section 2.5.3.2.B.2 the correct subject to section is "3.5.9.2.C". 11. D.S. 2-03.2.2.B.5 & D.S. 2-05.2.2.B.3 Under General Note 2 remove "GENERAL MERCHANDISE SUBJECT TO SECTION 3.5.9.2c." as it is referenced under General Note 6. 12. D.S. 2-03.2.2.B.7 & D.S. 2-05.2.2.B.10 Add a general note stating that the project is designed to meet the overlay zone criteria: Sec. 2.8.3, Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Setback Zone. 13. D.S. 2-05.2.3.C Label Silverbell Road as an "MS&R" and provide the recordation data. 14. D.S. 2-03.2.4.A & D.S. 2-05.2.4.A Provide distance and bearings for all proposed lot lines. 15. D.S. 2-03.2.4.D Remove the reference to "EXISTING R-2 ZONING" from within the Walgreens building footprint, sheet DP-2, from the plan. 16. D.S. 2-03.2.4.E & D.S. 2-05.2.4.C It appears that some type of phasing is proposed. If the project is phased, each phase must comply with Code requirements as a separate entity. Provide calculations and setback dimensions indicating how this is achieved. If phasing is proposed remove the reference to "A SEPARATE FORMAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN WILL BE SUBMITTED IN FUTURE FOR LOT 2 DEVELOPMENT" If phasing is not proposed then remove all reference to "FUTURE DEVELOPMENT" and remove all future development and relevant calculation from the plat. If phase is not proposed show LOT 2 as vacant. 17. D.S. 2-05.2.4.D Provide a parking area access lane (PAAL) width dimension from what appears to be a concrete island, east of the drive-thru canopy, east to the curb. 18. D.S. 2-05.2.4.D Provide a parking area access lane (PAAL) width dimension from the proposed loading spaces north to the curb. 19. D.S. 2-05.2.4.D Provide a parking area access lane (PAAL) width dimension from the southeast end of the curbing for the landscape area south of the proposed transformer, to the parking located to the east. 20. D.S. 2-05.2.4.D Per D.S. 3-05.2.2.B.3 A minimum distance of two (2) feet must be maintained between a PAAL and any wall, screen, or other obstruction, provided pedestrian activity is directed to another location. The additional area is necessary to provide clearance for fire, sanitation, and delivery vehicles. That said provide a dimension from the proposed transformer to the PAAL located to the east and west. 21. D.S. 2-03.2.4.J & D.S. 2-05.2.4.G If applicable all proposed easements (utility, sewer, drainage, access, etc.) are to be dimensioned and labeled as to their purposes and whether they will be public or private. 22. D.S. 2-03.2.4.M & D.S. 2-05.2.4.I On zoning setbacks, if the building is proposed for location at a greater distance from the property line than the required setback, show only the dimension of the distance between the building and the property line. If the setback's point of measurement is not the property line, include the distance from the property line to the point of measurement. That said remove the "BUILDING SETBACK LINES" from the plat. 23. D.S. 2-05.2.4.N Within the Walgreens building footprint, sheet DP-2, provide the building height. 24. D.S. 2-05.2.4.P Provide a detail for a standard vehicle parking space on the plat. 25. D.S. 2-05.2.4.P The handicapped vehicle parking space calculation appears to be incorrect. The number shown as required should be 4 not 8. 26. D.S. 2-05.2.4.P The standard vehicle parking space calculation shown for the (FUTURE RETAIL/OFFICE/MEDICAL) is not correct. If COMMERCIAL SERVICES USE GROUP, Medical Service - Outpatient, the required parking is based on One (1) space per one hundred seventy-five (175) sq. ft. GFA. If Medical Service - Outpatient is proposed revise the parking calculation accordingly. 27. D.S. 2-05.2.4.D Per D.S. 3-05.2.1.3 When the side(s) of a parking space abuts any vertical barrier over six (6) inches in height, other than a vertical support for a carport, the required width for the space is ten (10) feet to provide extra width to allow passengers to enter and exit the vehicle on the side where the barrier exists. That said provide a dimension from the proposed transformer to the parking space located to the north. 28. D.S. 2-05.2.4.Q Per D.S. 2-09.4.1 Class 2 bicycle parking is required to be located no more than 50 feet from the main building entrance and will be along the front side of the building. That said the proposed Class 2 location does not meet this standard. 29. D.S. 2-05.2.4.Q The provided Walgreens bicycle parking calculation is not correct. Per LUC Section 3.3.3.5 Bicycle Parking Requirements. The number of required bicycle parking spaces is calculated as a percentage of the total number of motor vehicle parking spaces provided. That said 93 vehicle parking spaces provided requires seven (7) bicycle parking spaces. 30. D.S. 2-05.2.4.Q For your information a single inverted "U" bicycle rack can support two (2) bicycles. 31. Depending on how the above comments are addressed addition comments may be forth coming. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.com Sshield1 on DS1/planning/New Development Package/ S10-051 RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised tentative plat/development plan. |
| 12/23/2010 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | PIMA COUNTY REGIONAL WASTEWATER RECLAMATION DEPARTMENT 201 NORTH STONE AVENUE TUCSON, ARIZONA 85701-1207 MICHAEL GRITZUK, P.E. PH: (520) 740-6500 DIRECTOR FAX: (520) 620-0135 December 22, 2010 To: KELLY HAYES EVERGREEN DEVCO, INC. Thru: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager City of Tucson Development Services Department __________________________ Reviewed by: Chad Amateau, P.E., Civil Engineer PCRWRD Subject: WALGREENS Site Plan – 1st Submittal S10-0051 The Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department (PCRWRD) has reviewed the proposed sewer collection lines for the above-referenced project. The following comments are offered for your use: Obtain a letter from the PCRWRD’s Development Liaison Unit, written within the past year, stating that treatment and conveyance system capacity for the project is available in the downstream public sewerage system and provide a copy of that letter to this office. The required form to request such a letter may be found at: http://www.pima.gov/wwm/developer.htm#permits The development plan for this project cannot be approved until a copy of this letter has been received by this office. Sheet 2: Call out the rim and invert elevations for all of the existing public manholes shown on plan and private cleanouts on site. Sheet 2: Call out the pipe size of the existing public sewer line. Sheet 2: Call out the existing stubout off of MH #6816-01 as private and call out the pipe size. Sheet 2: Call out the slope and length for the proposed private sewer line. This office will require a revised set of bluelines, and a response letter, addressing these comments. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. Pima County Code Title 13.20.030.A.2 requires that a wastewater review fee be paid for each submittal of the development plan. The fee for the first submittal is $166 plus $50 per sheet. For the second submittal, the review fee is $50 per sheet. For all subsequent submittals, the review fee is $39 per sheet. The next submittal of this project will be the second(2nd) submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $50.00 (made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER) must accompany the revised set of bluelines and response letter. If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly. If you have any questions about this review letter please call me @ the phone number below. ______________________________ Tom Porter, Sr. CEA, (520)740-6719 PCRWRD cc: Chad Amateau, PE Kristin Greene, PE, DLU Manager DLU Project folder |
| 12/23/2010 | FRODRIG2 | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Denied | Date Case Number Project Address December 22, 2010 S10-051 WALGREENS TENTATIVE PLAT Comments: Denied, The proposed Development Plan for the WALGREENS, TENTATIVE PLAT Case No.S10-051. Dose not meets the minimum requirements for the Environmental Services, Solid Waste Disposal Standard 6-01. 1. All containers shown on the TENTATIVE PLAT must labeled the intended us for the enclosures being Solid Waste or Recycle materials. 2. A Detail plan of the container enclosures must be shown on the plans clearly showing that the minimum inside dimension between the bollards shall be not less than 10'- 0". As shown on the Solid Waste Standards. 3. All enclosures must show the gates installed and mounted to the end on the CMU screen wall as show on Solid Waste Standards. Also the size of containers proposed to be use must be noted on the plans. Environmental Services Department Development Plan Review Reviewer: Tony Teran Office Phone (520) 837-3706 E-mail: Tony.Teran @tucsonaz.gov |
| 12/27/2010 | JOHN BEALL | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Denied | Compliance with the Pima County Trails System Master Plan is required for this site. Affected segment: Silverbell Road Path (P024) The proposed Silverbell Road Path follows Silverbell Road from Congress Street on the south to Twin Peaks Road on the north. It intersects or passes several features including: a backcountry trail just north of Speedway Boulevard, Trails End Wash Backcountry Trail, Christopher Columbus Park, Roger Wash Backcountry Trail, Sweetwater Wash Backcountry Trail, a backcountry trail on El Camino del Cerro, West Idle Hour Wash Backcountry Trail, Belmont Road Backcountry Trail, Wild Horse Wash Backcountry Trail, Cortaro Farms Road Path, Picture Rocks Wash Backcountry Trail, Scenic Drive Backcountry Trail, and Twin Peaks Road Backcountry Trail. Construction of the Silverbell Road Path is required adjacent to the site by the developer in the manner and location prescribed by the Pima County Trails System Master Plan, according to the standards of the Tucson Department of Transportation. Revise all plans as necessary. |
| 12/27/2010 | JOHN BEALL | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Denied | PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT COMMENTS Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT S10-051 Walgreens at Silverbell and St. Mary's 12/23/10 (X) Tentative Plat (X) Development Plan (X) Landscape Plan () Revised Plan/Plat () Board of Adjustment () Other - Elevations CROSS REFERENCE: C9-10-06, PA-10-02 NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Manzo Neighborhood Plan, Santa Cruz Area Plan GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: NO COMMENTS DUE BY: December 27, 2010 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: () No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment () Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions () RCP Proposal Complies with Plan Policies (X) See Additional Comments Attached () No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: (X) Resubmittal Required: (X) Tentative Plat (X) Development Plan (X) Landscape Plan (X) Other - Colored Elevations (all four sides) REVIEWER:JB 791-5505 DATE: 12/23/10 Planning and Development Services Department Community Planning Section S10-051 - Walgreens at Silverbell Road and St. Mary's Road December 23, 2010 The site is zoned R-2. Prior to the request for a change of zoning, the applicant was required to amend the Manzo Neighborhood Plan to allow for commercial development of the subject site at the northeast corner of Silverbell Road and St. Mary's Road. On September 8, 2010, Mayor and Council adopted Resolution 21613 amending the Manzo Neighborhood Plan to allow Neighborhood Commercial/Office/Low and Medium Density Residential on the 3.77-acre site. The applicant is now requesting to rezone the subject site from R-2 to C-1 to allow for commercial uses. Based on the applicant's request, a concurrent review for both the Rezoning, C9-10-06 and Tentative Plat/Development plan, S10-051, is being conducted by staff. Prior to the approval of S10-051, it shall comply with any and all conditions approved through the Rezoning process. Therefore, the following revisions to the development plan, as outlined by staff are subject to the C9-10-06, rezoning conditions, as may be approved/modified by Mayor and Council at a future date. Any changes by Mayor and Council for the Rezoning consideration, shall be addressed by the applicant prior to resubmittal of the Development Plan. Staff offers the following comments: 1. Please correct Parking Calculations on Sheet, DP-1, to reflect that number required by code, and not in excess. 2. If Lot 2 is to be developed at a future date, please provide a note on the Development Plan and Landscape Plan, that states dust control measures will be used, and show that bollards or curbing will restrict this area from providing onsite parking, until such time as Lot 2 is developed. 3. Provide 15-foot landscape border along northern boundary of the entire site (Future Development / Lot 2) using 24-inch box trees, continuing the extension of the mature trees that is depicted to be preserved in place. At the northeast corner of the site provide a wider landscape area that includes trees. All landscaping to be provided at the time of the development of Lot 1. 4. Provide for Lots 1 and 2 a cross access agreement (vehicular, pedestrian, and bicycle), and a cross parking agreement with the recordation shown in the General Notes, Sheet DP-1. Provide a hard copy of the recorded cross access / cross parking agreement with the submittal of the development plan. 5. Please provide a Key Note on the appropriate sheets to indicate all outdoor lighting, within or along the perimeters of site shall be mounted and directed in such a manner to protect adjacent residential uses from glare and spill over lighting onto off-site residential properties. Provide a typical or detail for all outdoor lighting showing it to be full cut-off, mounted and directed away from adjacent residential properties 6. All buildings are to be designed with 'four-sided' architecture. Provide color elevations, with dimensions, showing that the architectural detail for the rear and sides, is comparable to the front façade. 7. Provide a detail of the trash enclosure. On the development plan, sheet DP-2, show that the trash enclosure is 50-feet away from any residential property. 8. Provide a detail of the screen walls along the northern and eastern property lines that depicts one or more visually interesting design treatments, and indicate the height of the wall. Please include language that screen wall is graffiti-resistant. 9. On Sheet DP-2, revise Note 7 to include language that states that pedestrian crosswalks are to be either concrete pavers, patterned concrete, or textured colored stripping. 10. Include documentation with the Development Plan submittal that applicant is meeting with City of Tucson, Parks and Recreation Department and TDOT, to facilitate improvements and accessibility regarding the Silverbell Road Path as identified by the Pima County Regional Trail System Master Plan. |
| 12/28/2010 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1) Revise the landscape plans to show the limits of grading. DS 2-07.2.2.B.5 Revise the native plant preservation plans to show the limits of grading. DS 2-15.3.4.A 2) Revise the plans as necessary to comply with any conditions of the proposed rezoning. 3) Construction of the Silverbell Road Path is required adjacent to the site by the developer in the manner and location prescribed by the Pima County Trails System Master Plan, according to the standards of the Tucson Department of Transportation. Revise all plans as necessary. 4) Revise sheet DP-2 to note that LOT 2 will be treated with a seed mix for dust control. LUC 3.7.2.7.B,C. 5) Revise the Rain Water Harvesting Plan as follows: A) Revise the title if necessary to reflect that both active and passive systems are employed. B) Revise the plan to identify planted areas, other than those currently included in WHIA's. Planted areas where no infiltration/capture areas are designed still must be calculated in the water demand values for the site. C) Revise the capacity for WHIA 2 to reflect the correct average depth, not the maximum depth. D) Revise all plans as necessary to reflect that a separate meter will be provided for the irrigation system as well as a rain shut-off device. TCC Sec. 6-182.3 & DS 10-03.5.2.A E) Add maintenance notes per DS 10-03.6.0 and annual reporting requirements per DS 10-03.7.2. f) Add notes to any and all plans affected by the inspection requirements of DS 10-03.8.1. |
| 12/28/2010 | PGEHLEN1 | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Passed | |
| 12/28/2010 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | 4350 E. Irvington Road, Tucson, AZ 85714 Post Office Box 711, Tucson, AZ 85702 WR#231796 December 28, 2010 Dear Mr Carolan : SUBJECT: Walgreens S10-0051 Tucson Electric Power Company has reviewed and approved the development plan submitted December 6, 2010 It appears that there are no conflicts with the existing facilities within the boundaries of this proposed development. Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facilities map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. All relocation costs will be billable to the customer. In order to apply for electric service, call the New Construction Department at (520) 918-8300. Submit a final set of plans including approved site, offsite and electrical load plans. Include a CD with the AutoCAD version of the plans. If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Your final plans should be sent to: Tucson Electric Power Company Attn: Richard Harrington New Business Project Manager P. O. Box 711 (DB-101) Tucson, AZ 85702 520-917-8726 Please call the area Designer Mike Kaiser at (520) 918-8244, should you have any questions. Sincerely, Henrietta Noriega Office Specialist Design/Build hn Enclosures City of Tucson (Email only) cc:M. Kaiser |
| 12/28/2010 | ROBERT YOUNG | PIMA COUNTY | PIMA CTY - DEV REVIEW | Passed | |
| 12/28/2010 | PGEHLEN1 | OTHER AGENCIES | TUCSON AIRPORT AUTHORITY | Passed | per phone call from Jordan Feld. |
| 12/28/2010 | JANE DUARTE | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Denied | Compliance with the Pima County Trails System Master Plan is required for this site. Affected segment: Silverbell Road Path (P024) The proposed Silverbell Road Path follows Silverbell Road from Congress Street on the south to Twin Peaks Road on the north. It intersects or passes several features including: a backcountry trail just north of Speedway Boulevard, Trails End Wash Backcountry Trail, Christopher Columbus Park, Roger Wash Backcountry Trail, Sweetwater Wash Backcountry Trail, a backcountry trail on El Camino del Cerro, West Idle Hour Wash Backcountry Trail, Belmont Road Backcountry Trail, Wild Horse Wash Backcountry Trail, Cortaro Farms Road Path, Picture Rocks Wash Backcountry Trail, Scenic Drive Backcountry Trail, and Twin Peaks Road Backcountry Trail. Construction of the Silverbell Road Path is required adjacent to the site by the developer in the manner and location prescribed by the Pima County Trails System Master Plan, according to the standards of the Tucson Department of Transportation. Revise all plans as necessary. |
| 12/28/2010 | PGEHLEN1 | TUCSON WATER NEW AREA DEVELOPMENT | REVIEW | Approved |