Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Plan Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Plan Number - S10-024
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 08/26/2010 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 08/26/2010 | RONALD BROWN | ADA | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 09/02/2010 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Planning and Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: Alamo Lofts Development Package (2nd Review) S10-024 TRANSMITTAL DATE: September 02, 2010 DUE DATE: September 13, 2010 DEVELOPMENT PLAN COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. The Zoning Review Section conditionally approves the tentative plat for this subdivision, subject to the following changes on the executed tentative plat. However, should there be any changes requested by other CDRC members, the Zoning Review Section approval is void, and we request copies of the revised tentative plat to verify that those changes do not affect any zoning requirements. 2. Zoning acknowledges General Note 27. If approved provide the DSMR Number, date of approval, what was a approved, and any conditions of approval. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.com Sshield1 on DS1/planning/New Development Package/ S10-024 RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package. CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Planning and Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: Alamo Lofts Development Package (2nd Review) T10BU00987 TRANSMITTAL DATE: August 31, 2010 DUE DATE: September 13, 2010 GRADING PLAN COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. The grading plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until it has been approved by the Engineering, and Landscape Review Sections and until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. Zoning cannot approve the grading plan until the development package has been approved. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.com RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
| 09/07/2010 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Approved | PIMA COUNTY REGIONAL WASTEWATER RECLAMATION DEPARTMENT 201 NORTH STONE AVENUE TUCSON, ARIZONA 85701-1207 MICHAEL GRITZUK, P.E. PH: (520) 740-6500 DIRECTOR FAX: (520) 620-0135 August 31, 2010 To: DAN CASTRO RICK ENGINEERING Thru: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager City of Tucson Development Services Department ____________________________________________ From: Tom Porter, Sr. CEA (520-740-6719), Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department Subject: ALAMO LOFTS, LOTS 1-22 AND COMMON AREA'S "A, B-1 THRU B-6 AND C" Tentative Plat – 2nd Submittal S10-024 The Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department (PCRWRD) has reviewed the proposed sewer collection lines for the above-referenced project. The following comments are offered for your use: The Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department hereby approves the above referenced submittal of the tentative or preliminary plat as submitted. This comment letter has been reviewed and accepted for substantial conformance to Pima County Code Title 13 by: ___________________________ Chad Amateau, P.E., Civil Engineer PCRWRD, Planning Services Section, Development Liaison Unit cc: Chad Amateau, PE Kristin Borer, PE, DLU Manager DLU Project folder |
| 09/10/2010 | RONALD BROWN | ZONING HC | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 09/13/2010 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Approved | 1) Revise the landscape and all other plans and details regarding the perimeter screening requirements for portions of the site, if necessary. The applicable codes call for 5' masonry walls to screen parking lots from adjacent residentially zoned property. LUC Table 3.7.2-I, LUC 3.7.3.7.A.1 The June 19, 2008 letter to Mr Elias of the Planning Department dealt with the screen wall design criteria associated with the conditions of rezoning. Please forward any correspondence from the PDSD Director regarding decisions relative to the wall adjacent to the parking lots. |
| 09/14/2010 | MPADILL1 | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Approv-Cond | DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT S10-024 Alamo Lofts Reviewed: (X) Tentative Plat (X) Landscape Plan CROSS REFERENCE: C9-05-19 GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: No COMMENTS DUE BY: September 27, 2010 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: () No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment () Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions () RCP Proposal Complies with Plan Policies () See Additional Comments Attached (X) (*)See Special Comment - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: 7/12/10 (X) SUBJECT TO COMPLIANCE WITH ATTACHED COMMENT, A RESUBMITTAL IS NOT REQUIRED. REVIEWER: MSP 837-6971 DATE: 07/12/10 Department of Planning and Development Services Community Planning Staff S10-024 - Alamo Lofts, Tentative Plat Review September 10, 2010 Tentative plat S10-024 is approved by community planning, subject to the following requirement, which was sent and agreed upon by the applicant on August. 25, 2010. The required color palette (rezoning condition) must be reviewed by staff prior to the issuance of any building permits. In an effort to streamline and not hold up SFR permits, the color palette should be brought to planning staff (John or Manny) for approval before submitting the first building permit at the Alamo Loft site. If for any reason we are unable to approve the color palette at first review, it would hold up the first building (SFR) permit that would be in zoning review. Prior to MODEL/SFR approval, Planning and Development Services (Community Planning Staff) shall require a color palette, along with colored four-sided building elevations for each proposed model/SFR design. The colors proposed on each building elevation shall cross-reference color paint code, color name, and paint brand with the color palette. |
| 09/15/2010 | PAUL MACHADO | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | To: Patricia Gehlen DATE: September 14, 2010 CDRC/Zoning Manager SUBJECT: Alamo Lofts, 6109 E. Pima Street Tentative Plat, Final Plat S09-010 and Grading Plan T10BU00987 (Second Review) T14S, R14E, Section 01 SUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Final Plat, Tentative Plat, Drainage Report and Grading Plan (Development Package). The Final Plat (FP), Tentative Plat (SP), Drainage Report (DR) and Grading Plan (T10BU00987) cannot be approved as submitted. Please address the following review comments prior to the next submittal. Final Plat: 1. Please include a detailed response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the FP. 2. Submit the remaining assurance for review: " Amendment to Trust 3. Submit the above documents containing original signatures, copies of the documents and signatures will not be forwarded to the City of Tucson attorney for review. 4. Common areas "B-1" Thru "B-6" will need to be described individually in the title block per D.S. 2-01.3.9.C. Tentative Plat: 1. Please include a detailed response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the TP. 2. Common areas "B-1" Thru "B-6" will need to be described individually in the title block per D.S. 2-01.3.9.C. 3. The 10-year event must flow under all the pedestrian paths from any area. Adjust the drainage/sidewalk so that the flow is not on top of the sidewalks and show the placement and size of the sidewalk scuppers. A DSMR (DS10-15) was conditionally approved by Matt Flick. Here is the response and conditions for the DSMR: PDSD Engineering CONDITIONALLY APPROVES the DSMR with the following condition: Flow shall be taken beneath sidewalks at locations of concentrated flow. This is necessary to ensure conformance with Rezoning Condition #12 as per Ord. 10370: "The pedestrian circulation path, in any form, must be free from inundation during runoff from a ten-year storm." 4. Correct the "See Sheet" numbers on pages 5 and 6. Drainage Report: 1. Please include a detailed response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the DR. 2. The addendum to the DR must be submitted along with the original DR provided all comments have been met. 3. An addendum to the original DR will be accepted addressing the proposed changes in the drainage scheme especially the new channel at the north property line. 4. Provide details of all drainage structures in the DR or the addendum. 5. The 10-year event must flow under all the pedestrian paths from any area. Adjust the drainage/sidewalk so that the flow is not on top of the sidewalks and show the placement and size of the sidewalk scuppers. A DSMR (DS10-15) was conditionally approved by Matt Flick. Here is the response and conditions for the DSMR: PDSD Engineering CONDITIONALLY APPROVES the DSMR with the following condition: Flow shall be taken beneath sidewalks at locations of concentrated flow. This is necessary to ensure conformance with Rezoning Condition #12 as per Ord. 10370: "The pedestrian circulation path, in any form, must be free from inundation during runoff from a ten-year storm." Grading Plan: 1. Please include a detailed response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the GP. 2. The 10-year event must flow under all the pedestrian paths from any area. Adjust the drainage/sidewalk so that the flow is not on top of the sidewalks and show the placement and size of the sidewalk scuppers. A DSMR (DS10-15) was conditionally approved by Matt Flick. Here is the response and conditions for the DSMR: PDSD Engineering CONDITIONALLY APPROVES the DSMR with the following condition: Flow shall be taken beneath sidewalks at locations of concentrated flow. This is necessary to ensure conformance with Rezoning Condition #12 as per Ord. 10370: "The pedestrian circulation path, in any form, must be free from inundation during runoff from a ten-year storm." Stormwater pollution prevention plan: 1. The SWPPP is a plan that is a dynamic entity. Therefore the previously approved SWPPP showing the major changes on the subdivision will suffice for this project. 2. The SWPPP text, NOI, NOT, general permit, certifications etc. must also be submitted along with the SWPPP plan in the DP. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 837-4932 or Paul.Machado@tucsonaz.gov Paul P. Machado Senior Engineering Associate City of Tucson/Development Services Department 201 N. Stone Avenue P.O. Box 27210 Tucson, Arizona 85726-7210 (520) 791-5550 x1193 office (520) 879-8010 fax C:/6109 E. Pima St CDRC DEV PKG 2 |
| 09/16/2010 | JOHN WILLIAMS | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES September 15, 2010 Dan Castro Rick Engineering Company 3945 E. Fort Lowell Road, # 111 Tucson, Arizona 85712 Subject: S10-024 ALAMO LOFTS Tentative Package Dear Dan: Your submittal of June, 21, 2010 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a set of 3 DETAILED cover letters explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLACKLINES MUST BE FOLDED 3 Copies Revised Tentative Package (Zoning, Engineering, PDSD) 2 Copies Revised Drainage Report (Engineering, PDSD) Please Note: community planning will need a note added to the plat in regards to the color palette needing to be reviewed prior to issuance of building permits. Should you have any questions, please call me at (520) 837-4917. Sincerely, John Williams Planning Technician All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.tucsonaz.gov/dsd/ Via fax: 624-0384 |
| 09/16/2010 | JOHN WILLIAMS | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES *** REVISION *** September 16, 2010 Dan Castro Rick Engineering Company 3945 E. Fort Lowell Road, # 111 Tucson, Arizona 85712 Subject: S10-024 ALAMO LOFTS Tentative Plat Dear Dan: The above referenced plan has been CONDITIONALLY APPROVED by the Community Design Review Committee, subject to the revisions required on the blue lines per the on-line comments. Please submit the following documents for sign-off: 1 Blue line set of the Plat, Landscape Plan and NPPO. Please include applicable sheets from any other concurrent reviews. 1 CD that contains all of the drainage/hydrology and other reports submitted for the review and approval of this plan. Additional black line copies will be made from the complete set and distributed to various review agencies for their files. These copies will be ordered from the City's contracted print company and billed to you unless you already have an account at another printing company. Please let us know which printing company you would prefer to use and list them on your attached transmittal form when submitting your blue lines to the CDRC office for sign-off approval. Your printing company will deliver the original stamped blue line set to your office. If you are out of town you will need to contact the printing company for pick up or mailing arrangement options. Please note that the final plat must be approved by Mayor and Council and recorded within one year of date of approval of the tentative plat per LUC 4.1.7.3. Plans will not be signed and released until the CDRC office has been notified by PC Addressing that all fees for this plan have been paid. The CDRC office will need this confirmation in writing PLEASE HAVE THE CITY OF TUCSON APPROVAL STAMP PLACED ON EACH SHEET OF THE SUBMITTAL SET, PREFERABLY IN THE LOWER RIGHT HAND CORNER NEAR THE TITLE BLOCK. THE STAMP IS LOCATED AT http://www.tucsonaz.gov/dsd/CDRC___Rezoning/CDRC/CDRC_Stamp/cdrc_stamp.html. BLUELINE SETS THAT DO NOT HAVE THE STAMP WILL BE RETURNED FOR CORRECTION. Should you have any questions, please call me at 837-4917. Sincerely, John Williams Planning Technician All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: 322-6956 |