Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Plan Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: FINAL PLAT REVIEW
Plan Number - S10-024
Review Name: FINAL PLAT REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 06/21/2010 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 06/21/2010 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | COT NON-DSD | REAL ESTATE | Passed | |
| 06/25/2010 | ED ABRIGO | PIMA COUNTY | ASSESSOR | Approv-Cond | Office of the Pima County Assessor 115 N. Church Ave. Tucson, Arizona 85701 BILL STAPLES ASSESSOR TO: CDRC Office Subdivision Review City of Tucson (FAX# 791-5559) FROM: Sherry Hyde Senior Property Technician Pima County Assessor’s Office DATE: 6/24/10 RE: Assessor’s Review and Comments Regarding S10-024 ALAMO LOFTS: FINAL PLAT * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * X Plat meets Assessor’s Office requirements. _______ Plat does not meet Assessor’s Office requirements. COMMENTS: ALL STREETS MUST ME NAMED IN THE FINAL PLAT. NOTE: THE ASSESSOR’S CURRENT INVOLVEMENT IN PROCESSING ITS MANUAL MAPS TO DIGITAL FORMAT IS EXPEDITED GREATLY BY EXCHANGE OF DIGITAL DATA. IN THE COURSE OF RECORDING THIS SUBDIVISION YOUR ASSISTANCE IN PROVIDING THIS OFFICE WITH AN AUTOCAD COPY WOULD BE GREATLY APPRECIATED. THANK YOU FOR ANY DIGITAL DATA PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED. |
| 07/02/2010 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Denied | SUBJECT: ALAMO LOFTS S10-024 Tucson Electric Power Company (TEP) has received the final plat submitted for review June 22, 2010. TEP is unable to approve the plat at this time. An electrical design to determine our easement requirements will be provided on the Approved Tentative Plat with fifteen (15) working days upon receipt of the plat. Additional plans necessary for preparation of the design are: building plans including water, electrical, landscape, sidewalk and paving plans. Also, submit the AutoCAD version of the plat on a CD or email to lcastillo@tep.com. Please contact me at (520) 917-8745 if you have any questions. Liza Castillo Right of Way Agent II Tucson Electric Power Co. UniSource Energy Services offc-(520) 917-8745 fax-(520) 545-1416 lcastillo@tep.com <mailto:lcastillo@tep.com> |
| 07/19/2010 | JENNIFER STEPHENS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Approved | 201 N. STONE AV., 2ND FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 AUDREY FARENGA ADDRESSING REVIEW PH #: 740-6800 FAX #: 623-5411 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: AUDREY FARENGA, ADDRESSING REVIEW SUBJECT: S10-024 ALAMO LOFTS/FINAL PLAT DATE: July 19, 2010 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and we hereby approve this project. 1.) All addresses will need to be displayed per Pima County Address Standards at the time of final inspection. ***The Pima County Addressing Section can use digital CAD drawing files when submitted with your final plat Mylar. These CAD files can be submitted through Pima County Addressing. The digital CAD drawing files expedite the addressing and permitting processes when we are able to insert this digital data into the County's Geographic Information System. Your support is greatly appreciated.*** |
| 07/19/2010 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: Alamo Lofts S10-024 (2nd Review) Final Plat TRANSMITTAL DATE: July 19, 2010 DUE DATE: July 20, 2010 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. An applicant has one (1) year from the date of approval of tentative plat to obtain approval of a final plat that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application. This final plat must be approved and recorded on or before June 21, 2011 2. D.S. 2-03.6.1.K Place the S09-019 subdivision case number assigned to the plat in the lower right hand corner of the plat next to the title block. 3. Remove General Note 7 and the DSMR Case number from the plat. 4. Zoning cannot approve the final plat until the development package has been approved. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 791-5608 ext. 1180. C\planning\cdrc\finaplat\S10-024fp.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised final plat. |
| 07/20/2010 | PAUL MACHADO | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | To: Patricia Gehlen DATE: July 20, 2010 CDRC/Zoning Manager SUBJECT: Alamo Lofts, 6109 E. Pima Street Tentative Plat, Final Plat S09-010 and Grading Plan T10BU00987 (First Review) T14S, R14E, Section 01 SUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Final Plat, Tentative Plat, Drainage Report and Grading Plan (Development Package). The Final Plat (FP), Tentative Plat (SP), Drainage Report (DR) and Grading Plan (T10BU00987) cannot be approved as submitted. Please address the following review comments prior to the next submittal. Final Plat: 1. Please include a detailed response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the FP. 2. Submit the Subdivision Improvement Assurances for review. The following items are required in the assurance package if a Third Party Trust Agreement will be used: " Title Report " Special Warranty Deed " Trust Agreement " Amendment to Trust " Agreement to Construct 3. Submit the above documents containing original signatures, copies of the documents and signatures will not be forwarded to the City of Tucson attorney for review. 4. Please re-label all common areas that may be used in a dual and/or single use capacity per D.S. 2-03.6.4.C. For example, a Ret./Det. Basin may also be used as a recreation facility or only as a drainage facility or drainage channel and this must be reflected on the Final Plat. A key note explaining the labels could be used in conjunction with the labels, ie.: " Common Area "A" - Streets " Common Area "B" - Drainage/Recreation Facilities " Common Area "C" - Recreation Facilities " Common Area "D" - Drainage Facilities " Common Area "E" - Landscaping 3. The blanks will be completed by the Pima County Recorder's Office at the time of recordation. 4. The S(YR)-___ subdivision case number assigned to the approved tentative plat will be placed in the lower right corner of the plat next to the title block. If the property is subject to a rezoning case, the C9-__-__ rezoning case number is to be noted also. Review all relevant case numbers for expiration dates. 5. If the subdivision was the result of a rezoning case and did not require submittal and review of a tentative plat, add the following note: "Any relocation, modification, etc., of existing utilities and/or public improvements necessitated by the proposed development will be at no expense to the public." 6. If the project has common areas, label each common area individually with a separate letter designation. Enclose with a solid line each common area, private street, etc., that will have separate restrictions, a separate homeowners' association, or any common area that is separated by a public right-of-way. See following note no. 7. 7. Provide location, dimensions, areas in square footage, and purposes of lots proposed for dedication (such as open spaces, recreation areas, and natural areas) or for reservation for a public use (such as public parks, water facilities, and school sites). A common area will need to be provided for the drainage channel or be included in "Common Area C". It is preferred that a separate common area be dedicated for the drainage channel so that future lot owners are aware of their surroundings. 8. Show detention/retention areas in a surveyable and readily retraceable manner. For example, the common area dedicated for the drainage channel. 9. Indicate primary control points, or descriptions and ties to such control points, to which all dimensions, angles, bearings, and similar data on the plat will be referred. Where a coordinate system has been established by the City Engineer or County Engineer, primary control points may be referenced thereto. At least one (1) corner of the subdivision will be tied by course and distance to a section corner, a quarter section corner, or an established City or County survey monument by the monument line between the section corners. The plat must include a description of that corner marker and an indication of how the bearings were determined. Corner tie recordation information is to be provided on the plat. 10. Indicate tract boundary lines; right-of-way and centerlines of streets, easements, and other rights-of-way; and property lines of residential lots and other sites, with accurate dimensions, bearings, or deflection angles and radii, arcs, and central angles of all curves. There is a centerline and a section line (?) in Pima Street, label both as to their nature. All boundary monumentation must be labeled as "found" or "set." a. Fully describe and show all markings on found monuments. b. A one-half (½) inch iron rod tagged by a registered land surveyor will be set at all corners upon completion of construction. All corners in the subdivision, including the corners and lines of the common areas shall be indicated as "set". 11. Provide clarification on the detail for the SVT's. If the existing and future right-of-way are both 90' and both of the curb locations are 10' from the right-of-way line, then half of the 20' stem side (10') of the SVT would be located on the subdivision property. Also, the distance between both stems would a minimum of 24' since the entrance is also a min. 24'. The distances for the near side SVT is: 20'x265' and the distances for the far side SVT is: 20'x110'. Revise as required. 12. Please submit a copy of the subdivision boundary closure calculations. Tentative Plat: 1. Please include a detailed response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the TP. 2. A three (3) inch by five (5) inch space shall be reserved in the lower right quadrant of each sheet for an approval stamp per D.S. 2-01.2.5. 3. Page number and number of pages. The sheets for the entire "Plat Package" shall be paginated continuously per D.S. 2-01.2.9. 4. Review all relevant case numbers for expiration dates per D.S. 2-01.3.3.2. E. 5. Provide a sheet index on the first sheet per D.S. 2-01.3.3.5. 6. Add general note "Drainage must remain in its natural state…………" per D.S. 2-01.3.3.7.B.3.a. 7. The following information regarding existing private or public right-of-way adjacent to or within the site shall be provided:………… per D.S. 2-01.3.8.C. If the future and existing curb position (10' from r/w) are the same, then why is there a future SVT shown? 8. A common area will need to be provided for the drainage channel or be included in "Common Area C" per D.S. 2-01.3.9.C. 9. Verification will be provided that any drainage solutions which occur outside the boundaries of the development document area are constructed with adjacent owners' permission. Per D.S. 2-01.3.9.N.5. 10. Show refuse on-site collection areas, including locations of dumpsters, screening location and materials and vehicular maneuverability, fully dimensioned, and access route D.S. 2-01.3.9.T. The plan views of the refuse enclosures do not match detail J on sht. 3. Also dimension the 10'x10' clear area inside the refuse enclosure on detail J/3. 11. Provide a typical cross section between the proposed town homes. It appears that the drainage between the town homes is to typically flow within (on top of) the sidewalk (longitude) east to the water harvesting areas. As you are aware, the 10-year event must flow under all the pedestrian paths from any area. Adjust the drainage/sidewalk so that the flow is not on top of the sidewalks and show the placement and size of the sidewalk scuppers. 12. Complete or eliminate general note 20 and also complete the earthwork quantities on sht. 1. Drainage Report: 1. Please include a detailed response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the DR. 2. An addendum to the original DR will be accepted addressing the proposed changes in the drainage scheme especially the new channel at the north property line. 3. Provide details of all drainage structures in the DR. 4. Provide a typical cross section between the proposed town homes. It appears that the drainage between the town homes is to typically flow within (on top of) the sidewalk (longitude) east to the water harvesting areas. As you are aware, the 10-year event must flow under all the pedestrian paths from any area. Adjust the drainage/sidewalk so that the flow is not on top of the sidewalks and show the placement and size of the sidewalk scuppers. 5. The content and format of the Drainage Report should follow S.M.D.D.F.M., chap. II, 2.2. 6. Show the project address or administration address on the cover sheet of the DR. Grading Plan: 1. Please include a detailed response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the GP. 2. Add the following notes to the grading plan notes: " "The contractor shall remove the fine materials from the bottom of the detention/retention basin and scarify the basin bottom once the construction activities are completed in order to remove any fine material build up caused by construction and to restore soil percolation." " "Any engineering work to be done below grade (i.e. toe-downs, cutoff walls, drainage pipes/structures, etc.) shall not be back filled until Development Services Inspector inspects the work and approves it." 3. It appears that the drainage between the town homes is to typically flow within the sidewalk (longitude) east to the water harvesting areas. As you are aware, the 10-year event must flow under the pedestrian paths. Adjust the drainage and/or sidewalk so that the flow is not on top of the sidewalks and call-out the placement and size of the sidewalk scuppers. 4. Some discrepancies exist. with the numbering of the details/sections and which on page they shown. Revise as required. 5. Dimension from street monument lines to existing and proposed curbs, sidewalks, driveways, and utility lines per D.S. 2-02.2.1.21. 6. Please show dimensioned right-of-way, including any applicable Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Plan right-of-way per D.S. 2-02.2.1.19. 7. The existing patio wall north of the North of the property is located on adjacent property and cannot be used as part of the proposed drainage channel or permission must be obtained from the owner. However, if permission by the owner to use part of his property is obtained, then "protection" must be used to protect the exist. wall and for the footings of the exist. wall, i.e.: epoxy, dirt, rip-rap etc. Revise as required. 8. Keynote no. 7 must only call-out a proposed sidewalk per COT SD 200. The 2" compacted decomposed granite path will require a DSMR. 9. Show the refuse on-site collection areas, including locations of dumpsters, screening location and materials and vehicular maneuverability, fully dimensioned, and access routes. The plan view of the refuse enclosure does not match detail E on sht. 4. Also dimension the 10'x10' clear area in the refuse enclosure on detail E/4. 10. Complete Grading Plan number (T10BU00987) on all sheets. 11. Call out and show the rip-rap w/ filter fabric on detail T/5. 12. The cross section M/5 is actually on sht. 4. Revise as required. 13. The Curb opening detail K/4 lists the opening as 1'. How wide is the opening and call out the opening on the plan view and as well as where it is applicable? 14. Perhaps showing the distances or the distances being equal between the posts barricades may be clearer to construct instead of calling out that the post barricades are to be centered in the curb opening. Revise as required. 15. The Depressed Vertical Curb detail J/4 does not detail a depressed curb. Revise as required. 16. The grading slope on the plans shown on the West edge of the subdivision differs from detail T/5. Revise as required. 17. Correct the "For Continuation of Paving notes……." on sht. 1. The continuation of the notes is on page 5, not 6. 18. Add note: "All grading shall conform to City of Tucson Development Standard No. 11-01.0 - Excavation & Grading". 19. A permit or a private improvement agreement might be necessary for any work performed within the Right-of-way. Contact Permits and Codes at (520) 791-5100 for permit information. 20. Call out all slopes and stabilization material (concrete, riprap, gabions or vegetation). 21. Show all distances of street widths on the grading plan. Stormwater pollution prevention plan: 1. The SWPPP is a plan that is a dynamic entity. Therefore the previously approved SWPPP showing the major changes on the subdivision will suffice for this project. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 837-4932 or Paul.Machado@ci.tucsonaz.govs Paul P. Machado Senior Engineering Associate City of Tucson/Development Services Department 201 N. Stone Avenue P.O. Box 27210 Tucson, Arizona 85726-7210 (520) 791-5550 x1193 office (520) 879-8010 fax C:/6109 E. Pima St CDRC DEV PKG |
| 07/21/2010 | PGEHLEN1 | TUCSON WATER NEW AREA DEVELOPMENT | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 07/22/2010 | JWILLIA4 | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | July 22, 2010 To: Dan Castro Rick Engineering Thru: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager City of Tucson Development Services Department From: Chandubhai C Patel, P.E., Civil Eng. Manager Development Review Division ( Wastewater) Subject: ALAMO LOFTS, Lots 1 Thru 22, Common Areas "A", "B-1" Thru "B-6" & "C" Final Plat - 1st Submittal S10--024 The drawings of the Final Plat for the proposed project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department (PCRWRD).This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. 1. Sheet 1:DEDICATION, 4th para, 3rd line, Add PIMA COUNTY between PUBLIC and AND. 2. Sheet 1: The address for the Beneficiary is different here from that shown on the Tentative Plat. Needs correction. 3. All Sheets: Is this a re-subdivision ? If so, please indicate that in the Title Blocks. 4. General: It is noted that the Tentative Plat for this project is not approved yet. Please note that a Final Plat cannot be approved until the TP gets approved. The next submittal of this project will be the second (2nd) submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $100.00 (made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER must accompany the revised set of bluelines . If you have any questions regarding the above comments, please do not hesitate to contact me. |
| 07/22/2010 | JOHN WILLIAMS | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES July 27, 2010 Dan Castro Rick Engineering Company 3945 E. Fort Lowell Road, # 111 Tucson, Arizona 85712 Subject: S10-024 Alamo Lofts Final Plat Dear Dan: Your submittal of June 21, 2010 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a set of 6 DETAILED cover letters explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLACKLINES MUST BE FOLDED 6 Copies Revised Final Plat (Assessor, TEP, Zoning, Engineering, Wastewater, PDSD) 2 Copies 1 Original, 1 Copy of Subdivision Assurance Package (Engineering, PDSD) 1 Check Made out to "Pima County Treasurer" for $100.00 (Wastewater) Should you have any questions, please call me at 837-4917. Sincerely, John Williams Planning Technician All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: (520) |